Skip to main content

Classification Schemes for Visualization of Uncertainty in Digital Hypothetical Reconstruction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10025))

Abstract

The chapter presents the methodology that has been adopted to develop a process for acquiring knowledge that is able to note and make the analysis of preliminary data and interpretation criteria used through a 3D modeling reconstructive process understandable. The classification schemes and criteria adopted aimed to validate the entire process, giving us the ability to visually assess the proper level of knowledge related to the reconstructive process, with its flaws and lacunae, and to carry out comparative operations on the set of data and information held.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reilly, P.: Towards a virtual archaeology. In: Proceedings of Computer Applications in Archaeology, pp. 133–139 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, P., Richards, J.: The good, the bad and the downright misleading: archaeological adoption of computer visualization. In: Hugget, J., Ryan, N. (eds.) CAA 1994 Proceedings of the 22nd CAA Conference, Glasgow, vol. 60. Tempus Reparatum BAR International Series, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dell’Unto, N., Leander, A.M., Ferdani, D., Dellepiane, M., Callieri, M., Lindgren, S.: Digital reconstruction and visualization in archaeology: case-study drawn from the work of the Swedish Pompeii Project. In: 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress, pp. 621–628. IEEE, Marseille (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hermon, S., Sugimoto, G., Mara, H.: The London charter and its applicability. In: Future Technologies to Empower Heritage Professionals: VAST 2007, pp. 11–14. Eurographics Association, Geneva (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kőller, D., Frischer, B., Humphreys, G.: Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models. ACM J. Comput. Cultural Herit. 2(3), Article 7 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Münster, S.: Workflows and the role of images for virtual 3D reconstruction of no longer extant historic objects. ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. ISPRS II-5/W1, pp. 197–202 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grellert, M., Pfarr-Harfst, M.: 25 Years of virtual reconstructions project report of department information and communication technology in architecture at Technische Universität Darmstadt. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies 2013 (CHNT 18, 2013). Wien (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beacham, R., Denard, H., Niccolucci, F.: An introduction to the London Charter. In: Proceeding of Joint Event CIPA/VAST/EG/EuroMed (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Denard, H.: A new introduction to the London charter. In: Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage Digital Research in the Arts and Humanities Series, pp. 57–71. Ashgate (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan, N.: Documenting and validating virtual archaeology. In: Archeologia e Calcolatori, XII, pp. 245–273 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan, N.S., Frischer, B., Niccolucci, F., Barceló, J.A.: From CVR to CVRO: the past, present, and future of cultural virtual reality. In: Virtual Archaeology: Proceedings of the VAST Euroconference, Arezzo 24–25 November 2000, pp. 7–18 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hermon, S.: Reasoning in 3D: a critical appraisal of the role of 3D modelling and virtual reconstructions in archaeology. In: Beyond Illustration: 2D and 3D Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology, pp. 36–45 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hermon, S., Nikodem, J.: 3D modeling as a scientific research tool in archaeology. In: International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hermon, S., Niccolucci, F., D’Andrea, A.: Some evaluations on the potential impact of virtual reality on the archaeological scientific research. In: Proceedings of the VSMM 2005, Ghent, Belgium, pp. 105–114 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cerato, I., Pescarin, S.: Reconstructing past landscapes for virtual museums. In: Corsi, C., Slapšak, B., Vermeulen, F. (eds.) Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics. Non-invasive Survey of Complex Archaeological Sites, pp. 285–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sifniotis, M.: Representing archaeological uncertainty in cultural informatics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuroczyński, P., Hauck, O.B., Dworak, D.: Digital reconstruction of cultural heritage – questions of documentation and visualisation standards for 3D content. In: Klein, R., Santos, P. (eds.) EUROGRAPHICS Workshops on Graphics and Cultural Heritage (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Blaise, J.-Y., Dudek, I.: Visual tools decipher historic artefacts documentation. In: Journal of Universal Computer Science. 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management, pp. 456–463. Know-Center (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. www.londoncharter.org. Accessed 27 July 2016

  20. www.arqueologiavirtual.com/carta/. Accessed 27 July 2016

  21. Kensek, A.: Survey of methods for showing missing data, multiple alternatives, and uncertainty in reconstructions. In: CSA Newsletter, vol. XIX, no. 3. Winter (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Apollonio, F.I., Beltramini, G., Fabbi, G., Gaiani, M.: Villa Contarini a Piazzola sul Brenta: studi per un’ipotesi di attribuzione palladiana servendosi di modelli tridimensionali. Disegnare Idee Immagini, vol. 42, pp. 42–55 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Strothotte, T., Masuch, M., Isenberg, T.: Visualizing knowledge about virtual reconstructions of ancient architecture. In: Proceedings of Computer Graphics International, pp. 36–43 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kensek, K.M., Dodd, L.S., Cipolla, N.: Fantastic reconstructions or reconstructions of the fantastic? Tracking and presenting ambiguity, alternatives, and documentation in virtual worlds. Autom. Constr. 13(2), 175–186 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pollini, J., Dodd, L.S., Kensek, K.M.: Problematics of making ambiguity explicit in virtual reconstructions: a case study of the Mausoleum of Augustus (2006). http://www.chart.ac.uk/chart2005/papers/pollini.html

  26. Roberts, J.C., Ryan, N.: Alternative archaeological representations within virtual worlds. In: Bowden, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th UK Virtual Reality Specialist Interest Group Conference Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, pp. 179–188 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roussou, M., Drettakis, G.: Photorealism and non-photorealism in virtual heritage representation. In: Proceedings of VAST International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cargill, R.R.: The Qumran digital model. An argument for archaeological reconstruction in virtual reality. Near East. Archaeol. 72(1), 28–41 (2003). http://www-sop.inria.fr/reves/publications/data/2003/RD03c. Accessed 27 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pang, A.T., Wittenbrink, C.M., Lodha, S.K.: Approaches to uncertainty visualization. Vis. Comput. 13(8), 370–390 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zuk, T., Carpendale, S., Glanzman, W.D.: Visualizing temporal uncertainty in 3D virtual reconstructions. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage, VAST 2005, pp. 99–106. Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pollini, J., Dodd, L.S., Kensek, K., Cipolla, N.: Problematics of making ambiguity explicit in virtual reconstructions: a case study of the Mausoleum of Augustus. In: Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of CHArt: Computers and the History of Art. British Academy, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. D’Arcangelo, M., Della Schiava, F.: Dall’antiquaria umanistica alla modellazione 3D: una proposta di lavoro tra testo e immagine. Camenae 10, 23 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Perlinska, M.: Palette of possibilities. Lund University, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Ph.D. thesis (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stefani, C., Busayarat, C., Renaudin, N., De Luca, L., Véron, P., Florenzano, M.: Une approche de modélisation basée sur l’iconographie pour l’analyse spatio-temporelle du patrimoine architectural. In: Colloque Arch-I-Tech, November 17–19. Ausonius, France (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bakker, G., Meulenberg, F., Rode, J.D.: Truth and credibility as a double ambition: reconstruction of the built past, experiences and dilemmas. J. Vis. Comput. Anim. 14(3), 159–167 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Borra, D.: Sulla verità del modello 3D. un metodo per comunicare la validità dell’anastilosi virtuale. In: Proceeding of eArcom 04 tecnologie per comunicare l’architettura, pp. 132–137. Ancona: CLUA edizioni (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Borghini, S., Carlani, R.: La restituzione virtuale dell’architettura antica come strumento di ricerca e comunicazione dei beni culturali: ricerca estetica e gestione delle fonti. Disegnarecon 4(8), 71–79 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Apollonio, F.I., Gaiani, M., Zheng, S.: Characterization of uncertainty and approximation in digital reconstruction of CH artifacts. In: Le vie dei Mercanti. XI Forum Internazionale di Studi, pp. 860–869. La scuola di Pitagora editrice, Napoli (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Apollonio, F.I., Gaiani, M., Zheng, S.: 3D modeling and data enrichment in digital reconstruction of Architectural Heritage. In: XXIV International CIPA Symposium, ISPRS XL-5/W2, pp. 43–48. ISPRS, Strasbourg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bonde, S., Maines, C., Mylonas, E., Flanders, J.: The virtual monastery: representing time, human movement, and uncertainty at Saint-Jean-des-Vignes, Soissons. Vis. Resour. 25(4), 363–377 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vico Lopez, M.D.: La “Restauración Virtual” según la interpretación arquitectonico constructiva: metodologia y aplicación al caso de la Villa de Livia. Ph.D. thesis, p. 117 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Viscogliosi, A.: L’uso delle ricostruzioni virtuali tridimensionali nella storia dell’architettura: immaginare la Domus Aurea. J. Roman Archaeol. 61, 207–219 (2006). Supplementary series

    Google Scholar 

  43. Georgiou, R., Hermon, S.: A London Charter’s visualization: the ancient hellenistic-roman theatre in Paphos. In: VAST: International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage-Short and Project Papers, pp. 53–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lulof, P., Opgenhaffen, L., Sepers, M.: The art of reconstruction documenting the process of 3D modeling: some preliminary results. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Heritage, pp. 333–336 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Demetrescu, E.: Archaeological Stratigraphy as a formal language for virtual reconstruction. Theory and practice. J. Archaeol. Sci. 57, 42–55 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stefani, C., De Luca, L., Véron, P., Florenzano, M.: Modeling building historical evolutions. In: Proceedings of Focus K3D Conference on Semantic 3D Media and Content. INRIA, Sophia Antipolis (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stiny, G., Mitchell, W.J.: The Palladian grammar. Environ. Plann. B 5, 5–18 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stiny, G.: Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environ. Plann. B 7, 343–351 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tzonis, A., Oorschot, L.: Frames, Plans, Representation Concept dicta at Inleiding Programmatische en Functionele Analyse. Technical report, Delft, University of Technology (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Quintrand, P., Autran, J., Florenzano, M., Fregier, M., Zoller, J.: La CAO en Architecture. Hermes, Paris (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  51. De Luca, L., Florenzano, M., Veron, P.: A generic formalism for the semantic modeling and representation of architectural elements. Vis. Comput. 23, 181–205 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ullrich, T., Settgast, V., Fellner, D.W.: Semantic fitting and reconstruction. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 1(2), 1–20 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Apollonio, F.I., Gaiani, M., Benedetti, B.: 3D reality-based artefact models for the management of archaeological sites using 3D GIS: a framework starting from the case study of the Pompeii Archaeological area. J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 1271–1287 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Apollonio, F.I., Gaiani, M., Corsi, C.: A semantic and parametric method for 3D models used in 3D cognitive-information system. In: Schmitt, G., Hoverstadt, L., Van Gool, L., Bosché, F., Burkhard, R., Coleman, S., Halatsch, J., Hansmeyer, M., Konsorski-Lang, S., Kunze, A., Sehmi-Luck, M. (eds.) Future Cities, 28th eCAADe 2010 Conference, pp. 717–726. ECAADE – ETH Zurich, Zurich (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Apollonio, F.I.: Architettura in 3D. Modelli digitali per i sistemi cognitivi, Bruno Mondadori, Milano (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lambe, P.: Organising Knowledge. Taxonomies Knowledge and Organisational Effectiveness. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Malafsky, G.P., Newman, B.D.: Organizing Knowledge with Ontologies and Taxonomies. TechI LLC, Fairfax (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  58. http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/aat/. Accessed 26 July 2016

  59. Apollonio, F.I., Benedetti, B., Gaiani, M., Baldissini, S.: Construction, management and visualization of 3D models of large archeological and architectural sites for e-Heritage GIS systems. In: Pavelka, K. (ed.) XXIIIrd International CIPA Symposium Proceedings, Czech Technical University in Prague, pp. B.2.97–B.2.104 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pfarr, M.: Dokumentationsystem für Digitale Rekonstruktionen am Beisèiel der Grabanlage Zhaoling, Provinz Shaanxi. Technische Universitat Darmastadt, China (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zuk, T., et al.: Visualizing temporal uncertainty in 3D virtual reconstructions. In: Mudge, M., Ryan, N., Scopigno, R. (eds.) VAST 2005, The 6th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage, pp. 99–106. ISTI-CNR, Pisa (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  62. De Luca, L., Busarayat, C., Stefani, C., Renaudin, N., Florenzano, M., Véron, P.: An iconography-based modeling approach for the spatio-temporal analysis of architectural heritage. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Shape Modeling International Conference (SMI 2010), pp. 78–89. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lo Buglio, D., De Luca, L.: Representation of architectural artifacts: definition of an approach combining the complexity of the 3D digital instance with the intelligibility of the theoretical model. SCIRES-IT 2(2), 63–76 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Beltramini, G.: Andrea Palladio. Plan and elevation of a villa for two brothers (Villa Contrarini at Piazzola?). In: Hind, C., Murray, I. (eds.) Palladio and His Legacy, A Transatlantic Journey, pp. 75–76. Marsilio, Venezia (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bentkowska-Kafel, A., Denard, H., Baker, D.: Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage. Ashgate, Farnham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Robinson, A.H., Morrison, J.L., Muehrke, P.C., Kimmerling, A.J., Guptill, S.C.: Elements of Cartography, 6th edn. Wiley, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Richards, J.A., Jia, X.: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction, 4th edn, pp. 102–104. Birkhäuser, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Campbell, J.B.: Introduction to Remote Sensing, 4th edn, p. 626. Taylor & Francis, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Light, A., Bartlein, P.J.: The end of the rainbow? Color schemes for improved data graphics. EOS 85(40), 385–391 (2004). Transactions American Geophysical Union

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Stone, M.: Choosing colors for data visualization. Business Intelligence Network (2006). http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/b-eye/choosing_colors.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016

  71. Reichert, P., Borsuk, M.E.: Does high forecast uncertainty preclude effective decision support? Environ. Model Softw. 20(8), 991–1001 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I want to express my thanks to Marco Gaiani for his long last and profitable 3D digital reconstruction carried out on the work of Palladio, to Guido Beltramini for the valuable assignment of Palladio’s ‘Project for a twin’ to villa Contarini and to Giacomo Fabbi for the digital reconstruction of ‘Project for a twin’ after the drawing stored up at RIBA, London.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio I. Apollonio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Apollonio, F.I. (2016). Classification Schemes for Visualization of Uncertainty in Digital Hypothetical Reconstruction. In: Münster, S., Pfarr-Harfst, M., Kuroczyński, P., Ioannides, M. (eds) 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10025. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47647-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47647-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47646-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47647-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics