Skip to main content

A Study on Trust in a Robotic Suitcase

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9979))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This work presents a study on human-robot interaction between a prototype of a robotic suitcase – aBag – and people using it. Importantly, for an autonomous robotic suitcase to be successful as a product, people need to trust it. Therefore, a study was performed, where participants used aBag (remotely operated using the Wizard of Oz technique) for carrying their belongings. Two different conditions were created: (1) aBag follows the participant at a close range; (2) aBag follows the participant on a further distance. We expected that participants would trust more aBag when it was following them at a close range, but interestingly participants seemed to trust more when aBag was further away. Also, regardless of the conditions, the level of trust in aBag was significantly higher after the interaction compared to before, bringing positive results to the development of this kind of robotic apparatus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A video presenting the experiment using the recordings from the participants’ interactions with aBag is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4mw5WX-AS8&feature=youtube.

References

  1. Argyle, M.: Bodily Communication, 2nd edn. Routledge (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Correia, F., Alves-Oliveira, P., Maia, N., Ribeiro, T., Petisca, S., Melo, F.S., Paiva, A.: Just follow the suit! trust in human-robot interactions during card game playing. In: RO-MAN (2016, in Press)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gockley, R., Forlizzi, J., Simmons, R.: Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In: HRI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hancock, P., et al.: A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 53(5), 517–527 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huttenrauch, H., et al.: Investigating spatial relationships in human-robot interaction. In: IROS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, J., Moray, N.: Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergon. 35(10), 1243–1270 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Libman, A., et al.: NUA – The carry-on that follows you wherever you go. In: NUA (2015). http://unbouncepages.com/nuarobotics/.

  8. Pacchierotti, E., et al.: Evaluation of passing distance for social robots. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salem, M., et al.: Evaluating trust and safety in HRI: practical issues and ethical challenges. In: Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Satake, J., Miura, J.: Robust stereo-based person detection and tracking for a person following robot. In: ICRA – Workshop on People Detection and Tracking (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schaefer, K.: The perception and measurement of human-robot trust. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Central Florida, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Syrdal, D., et al.: A personalized robot companion? – the role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios. In: RO-MAN (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Syrdal, D., et al.: Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario-anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C.: Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: IROS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tapus, A., et al.: Socially assistive robotics [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14(1), 35–42 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Can we trust robots? [Special report]. IEEE Spectrum 53(6), 26–27 (2016). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) with reference UID/CEC/50021/2013. P. Alves-Oliveira acknowledges a FCT grant ref. SFRH/BD/110223/2015. The authors are solely responsible for the content of this publication. It does not represent the opinion of the EC, and the EC is not responsible for any use that might be made of data appearing therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beatriz Quintino Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferreira, B.Q., Karipidou, K., Rosa, F., Petisca, S., Alves-Oliveira, P., Paiva, A. (2016). A Study on Trust in a Robotic Suitcase. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, JJ., Howard, A., Salichs, M., He, H. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9979. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47436-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47437-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics