Skip to main content

Ethical Decision Making in Robots: Autonomy, Trust and Responsibility

Autonomy Trust and Responsibility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9979))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Autonomous robots such as self-driving cars are already able to make decisions that have ethical consequences. As such machines make increasingly complex and important decisions, we will need to know that their decisions are trustworthy and ethically justified. Hence we will need them to be able to explain the reasons for these decisions: ethical decision-making requires that decisions be explainable with reasons. We argue that for people to trust autonomous robots we need to know which ethical principles they are applying and that their application is deterministic and predictable. If a robot is a self-improving, self-learning type of robot whose choices and decisions are based on past experience, which decision it makes in any given situation may not be entirely predictable ahead of time or explainable after the fact. This combination of non-predictability and autonomy may confer a greater degree of responsibility to the machine but it also makes them harder to trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alaieri, F., Vellino, A.: The Ethical Characteristics of Autonomous Robots. We Robot Poster, April 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/34809

  2. Allen, C., Smit, I., Wallach, W.: Artificial morality: top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics Inf. Technol. 7(3), 149–155 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, C., Wallach, W., Smit, I.: Why machine ethics? IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 12–17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Mag. 28(4), 15–26 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asaro, P.: Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asaro, P.: What should we want from a robot ethic? Int. Rev. Inform. Ethics 6, 9–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bass, D.: Clippy’s back: the future of Microsoft is Chatbots. Bloomberg Businessweek, March 2016. http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-microsoft-future-ai-chatbots/

  8. Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D.: Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. J. Hum.-Robot Interac. 3(2), 74–99 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colombo, M., Hartmann, S.: Bayesian cognitive science, unification, and explanation. Br. J. Philos. Sci., axv036 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crabb, P.B., Stern, S.E.: Technology traps. In: Luppicini, R. (ed.) Ethical Impact of Technological Advancements and Applications in Society, pp. 39–46. IGI Global, April 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C.J., et al.: Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529(7587), 484–489 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Persson, D.: Sharing moral responsibility with robots: a pragmatic approach. In: Tenth Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, SCAI 2008, pp. 165–168 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gert, B.: Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hellström, T.: On the moral responsibility of military robots. Ethics Inf. Technol. 15(2), 99–107 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hew, P.C.: Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies. Ethics Inform. Technol. 16(3), 197–206 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvik, M.: How to understand moral responsibility? TRAMES: J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 7(3), 147–163 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, D.G.: Computer systems: moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics Inf. Technol. 8(4), 195–204 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, D.G.: Technology with no human responsibility? J. Bus. Ethics 127(4), 707–715 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuflik, A.: Computers in control: rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy? Ethics Inf. Technol. 1(3), 173–184 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lomas, M., Chevalier, R., Vincent Cross II, E., Garrett, R.C., Hoare, J., Kopack, M.: Explaining robot actions. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 187–188. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Malle, B.F.: Integrating robot ethics and machine morality: the study and design of moral competence in robots. Ethics Inf. Technol. 18(70), 1–14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, K.W.: Moral responsibility for computing artifacts: “The Rules". IT Prof. 13(3), 57–59 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Moyer, C.: How Google’s AlphaGo Beat a Go World Champion. The Atlantic, March 2016. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/03/the-invisible-opponent/475611/

  24. Noorman, M., Johnson, D.G.: Negotiating autonomy and responsibility in military robots. Ethics Inf. Technol. 16(1), 51–62 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Royakkers, L.: A literature review on new robotics: automation from love to war. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(5), 1–22 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheutz, M., Malle, B.F.: think and do the right thinga plea for morally competent autonomous robots. In: 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stahl, B.C.: Responsible computers? a case for ascribing quasi-responsibility to computers independent of personhood or agency. Ethics Inf. Technol. 8(4), 205–213 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tzafestas, S.G.: Roboethics. A Navigating Overview, vol. 79. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Wallach, W.: A Dangerous Master. How to Keep Technology from Slipping Beyond Our Control. Basic Books, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Vellino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alaieri, F., Vellino, A. (2016). Ethical Decision Making in Robots: Autonomy, Trust and Responsibility. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, JJ., Howard, A., Salichs, M., He, H. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9979. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47436-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47437-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics