Abstract
Using examples of geophysical processes, I discuss the implications for semiotics (physiosemiotics) of Peirce’s statement that “habit is by no means exclusively a mental act … The stream of water that wears a bed for itself is forming a habit” (CP 5.492). Geophysical phenomena are habit-producing processes that open up, not close down, the future and are always already recording phenomena that take advantage of their past and that reveal themselves as “natural propositions”, in Stjernfelt’s terms (2014). Further, the relationship of habit structure to habit structure, as concerns especially the emergence of “semiotic freedom” (Hoffmeyer 1996, 2010), can best be understood in terms of how habits simultaneously make themselves necessary AND necessarily irrelevant: here I follow Hofstadter (2007) and his concept of “responsible irrelevance” (2007), what I call “irrealevance”. The question is this: how has nature been able to seal itself off from that for which it is responsible in order to open up its own future?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bataille, Georges. 1985. Visions of excess. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Clark, Andy, and David J. Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58: 10–23.
Champagne, Marc. 2013. A necessary condition for proof of abiotic semiosis. Semiotica 197: 283–287.
Coletta, W.John. 1996. Predation as predication. Semiotica 109(3/4): 221–235.
Coletta, W. John. 2015. Semiotic modeling: A pragmaticist’s guide. In International handbook of semiotics, ed. Peter Pericles Trifonas, 951–980. Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Coletta, W. John, Dometa Wiegand, and Michael C. Haley. 2009. The semiosis of stone: A “rocky” rereading of Samuel Taylor Coleridge through Charles Sanders Peirce. Semiotica 174: 1/4: 69–143.
Corrington, Robert. 1994. Ecstatic naturalism: Signs of the world. Advances in semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Deely, John. 1990. Basics of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Deely, John. 2001. Physiosemiosis in the semiotic spiral: A play of musement. Sign Systems Studies 29(1): 27–48.
Deacon, Terrence. 2012. Incomplete nature. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Einstein, Albert. 2008 [1919]. What is the theory of relativity? In The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing, ed. Richard Dawkins, 314–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haley, Michael Cabot. 1999. Personal Communication. 28 June 1999. (Also published [page 113] of W. John Coletta, Dometa Wiegand, and Michael C. Haley, The semiosis of stone: A “rocky” rereading of Samuel Taylor Coleridge through Charles Sanders Peirce. Semiotica 174(1/4): 69–143, 2009.).
Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1996. Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2010. Semiotic freedom: An emerging force. In Pierce and biosemiotics: A guess at the riddle, eds. Davis, Paul and Nils Henrik Gregersen, 185–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hofstadter, Douglas R. 2007. I am a strange loop. New York: Basic Books.
Ibri, Ivo A. 2008. The continuity of life: On Peirce’s objective idealism. In Pierce and biosemiotics: A guess at the riddle, eds. Vinicius Romanini and Eliseo Fernandez., 33–49. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Kessler, M. A. and B. T. Werner. 2003. Self-organization of sorted patterned ground. Science (17 January 2003) 299[5605]: 380–383.
Mann, Daniel. 2003. On patterned ground. Science (17 January 2003) 299[5605]: 354–355.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1913. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–6, eds. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1935. Vols. 7–8, ed. Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958. [References to Peirce’s papers will be designated by CP, followed by volume, period, paragraph number.].
Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1893. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writing. Vol. 1 (1867–1893), eds. Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992. [References to this volume will be designated by EP 1, followed by colon, page number.].
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.
West, Donna E. 2013. Deictic Imaginings: Semiosis at Work and at Play. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
West, Donna E. 2014. From habit to habituescence: Peirce’s continuum of ideas. Semiotics 2013: 117–126.
Zalta, Edward N., Uri Nodelman, and Colin Allen, eds. 1995. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/contents.html (21 October 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coletta, J. (2016). The “Irrealevance” of Habit Formation: Stjernfelt, Hofstadter, and Rocky Paradoxes of Peircean Physiosemiosis. In: West, D., Anderson, M. (eds) Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45918-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45920-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)