Abstract
This chapter focuses on the preparation of pre-service teachers to teach science to English Learners (ELs) and is based on the SSTELLA (Secondary Science Teaching with English Language and Literacy Acquisition) project that has been implemented in four pre-service teacher education programs in Arizona, California and Texas. The SSTELLA project uses a practice-focused model of teacher education to engage novice teachers in observation, analysis, and experience with explicit models of the instructional approaches they are being prepared to teach. It describes how four SSTELLA practices – Scientific Sense-making, Scientific Discourse, English Language and Literacy Development, and Contextualized Science Activity–are articulated across the coursework and practicum requirements of the teacher education program through the use of instructional exemplars, video cases, and professional development with cooperating teachers and teacher supervisors. Data are presented that show that teacher candidates who participated in the SSTELLA intervention implemented several key practices at a higher level: contextualizing science activity, and engaging students in productive talk and student-student interaction. Furthermore, these teacher candidates showed higher self-efficacy for teaching ELs than candidates who were not part of the intervention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
These strategies however need to be considered carefully to sustain nature of science activities being addressed.
- 2.
EL or English Learner/Limited English Proficient terms are used in many official state and federal policies to refer to students acquiring a second language in school. We acknowledge that these terms are problematic terms because these students are very diverse from age of arrival to the U.S., to proficiency in the primary language, and prior academic preparation among other significant differences. ELs can’t be defined as a homogeneous or absolute group; moreover, state assessments used to classify EL designations and language levels differ from state to state. The term “EL” moreover is a restrictive identifier that fails to acknowledge non-English primary languages and the emergence of bilingual abilities.
References
Abell, S. K., & Cennamo, K. S. (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 103–130). New York: Elsevier JAI.
Ash, D. (2007). Using video data to capture discontinuous science meaning making in non- school settings. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 207–226). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.
Ball, A., & Tyson, C. (Eds.). (2011). Studying diversity in teacher education. New York: Roman.
Ballantyne, K. G., Sanderman, A. R., & Levy, J. (2008). Educating English language learners: Building teacher capacity Roundtable Report. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Program. George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Baquedano-Lopez, P., Solis, J. L., & Kattan, S. (2005). Adaptation: The language of classroom learning. Linguistics and Education, 6, 1–26.
Bruna, K. R., Vann, R., & Perales Escudero, M. (2007). What’s language got to do with it?: A case study of academic language instruction in a high school “English Learner Science” class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 36–54.
California Legislative Analysts Office (LAO). (2007–2008). Budget book – Education analyses, February 21, 2007. California Legislative Analyst’s Office Report, 2007–08.
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 401–417.
Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Barber, J., Hiebert, E., & Bravo, M. A. (2007). Integrating literacy and science: The research we have, the research we need. In M. Pressley, A. K. Billman, K. Perry, K. Refitt, & J. Reynolds (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement. New York: Guilford.
Cheuk, T. (2012). Relationships and convergences found in the common core state standards in mathematics (practices), common core state standards in ELA/Literacy*(student portraits), and a framework for K-12 science education (science & engineering practices). Unpublished work. Stanford University, Understanding Language Initiative.
Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., McIntyre, D. J., & Demers, K. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis and the Association of Teacher Educators.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2010).
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
Echevarria, J. J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2012). Making content comprehensible for English learners (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Driscoll, A. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California’s teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Santa Cruz: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2013). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Godley, A. J., Sweetland, J., Wheeler, R. S., Minnici, A., & Carpenter, B. D. (2006). Preparing teachers for dialectally diverse classrooms. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 30–37.
Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.
Hammond, L. (2001). Notes from California: An anthropological approach to urban science education for language minority families. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 983–999.
Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, P. W. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72(5), 597–614.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development. White Plains: Longman.
Langman, J. (2014). Translanguaging, identity, and learning: Science teachers as engaged language planners. Language Policy, 13(2), 183–200.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 31–52.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Lyon, E. (2016). The antibiotic resistance of MRSA: Teaching natural selection with literacy development for English learners. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 53(1), 33–47.
Lyon, E., Tolbert, S., Solis, J. L., Stoddart, T., Salinas, I., Knox, C., Roth, B., & Butler, M. (2016, April). Teaching English learners through science-language integration: Linking a conceptual framework to secondary teacher preparation. Strand 7 Symposium at the annual conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
Lyon, E. G., Tolbert, S., Solis, J. L., Stoddart, T., & Bunch, G. C. (2016). Secondary science teaching for English learners: Developing supportive and responsive learning contexts for sense-making and language development. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
McEneaney, E. H., López, F., & Nieswandt, M. (2014). Instructional models for the acquisition of English as bridges into school science: Effects on the science achievement of US Hispanic English language learners. Learning Environments Research, 17(3), 305–318.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). (NCES) The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2009. Institute of Education Sciences.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ovando, C. J., & Combs, M. C. (2012). Bilingual and ESL classrooms (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Rivet, A., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 79–100.
Rodriguez, G. M. (2013). Power and agency in education exploring the pedagogical dimensions of funds of knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 87–120.
Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (2008). Teaching science to English language learners. Alexandria: National Science Teachers Association.
Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117–148.
Schwartz, D. L., & Hartman, K. (2007). It is not television anymore: Designing digital video for learning and assessment. Video Research in the Learning Sciences, 335–348.
Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 1–27). New York: Elsevier JAI.
Short, D. J., Vogt, M., & Echevarría, J. (2011). The SIOP model for teaching science to English learners. Boston: Pearson.
Sleeter, C. E. (2015). Towards teacher education research that informs policy. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 146–153.
Speck, M., & Knipe, C. (2001). Why can’t we get it right? Professional development in our schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Stoddart, T. (1993). The professional development school: Building bridges between cultures. Educational Policy, 7(1), 5–23.
Stoddart, T. (2005). Improving student achievement with the CREDE five standards pedagogy (Technical Report No. J1). Santa Cruz: University of California, Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664–687.
Stoddart, T., Bravo, M., Solis, J., & Mosqueda, E. (2011). Preparing pre-service elementary teachers to teach science to English language learners. Proceedings of the international conference on education, Honolulu, HI.
Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615.
Trent, S. C., Kea, C. D., & Oh, K. (2008). Preparing pre-service educators for cultural diversity: How far have we come? Exceptional Children, 74, 328–350.
Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–595.
Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Document R-1-3. 1–83. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.
Zeichner, K. M. (2003). The adequacies and inadequacies of three current strategies to recruit, prepare, and retain the best teachers for all students. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 490–519.
Zwiers, J. (2008). Building academic language. London: Newark International Reading Association.
Acknowledgment
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Discovery Research K–12 Program under Grant No. DRL-1316834. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stoddart, T., Solis, J., Lyon, E.G., Tolbert, S. (2017). Preparing Pre-service Secondary Teachers to Teach Science to English Learners: Theory into Practice. In: Oliveira, A., Weinburgh, M. (eds) Science Teacher Preparation in Content-Based Second Language Acquisition. ASTE Series in Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43516-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43516-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43514-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43516-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)