Skip to main content

A New Method for Estimating Small Area Demographics and Its Application to Long-Term Population Projection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Frontiers of Applied Demography

Part of the book series: Applied Demography Series ((ADS,volume 9))

Abstract

This chapter discusses a newly proposed method by the author for estimating small area demographics, and explains how to apply this method to long-term small area population projection. Since small area demographics are generally very unstable, various methods of estimating the true values of such data have been developed or considered, chiefly by statisticians and demographers. Most previous methods essentially perform data smoothing by using demographics from adjacent small areas. Empirical Bayes estimation is a representative smoothing method for small area demographics and has been widely applied to mortality. Although the theoretical precision of this method has already been proven, we should pay attention to the fact that there are a few disadvantages in applying it to population projection. In order to overcome those disadvantages, the author proposed a new estimation method of small area demographics in 2014, using the concept of population potential developed by Stewart in 1947. The new method consists of six formulas. This chapter examines the efficacy of the new method by applying two of those six formulas, and the empirical Bayes estimator, to actual mortality data, and then explains how to apply the new method to long-term population projection. A brief introduction of the original population projection system constructed on the internet using the new method is also included in the chapter. These discussions enable us to understand that the new method has the following advantages: first, it satisfactorily utilizes position or coordinate data of adjacent areas; second, the strength of its smoothing is adequate to the avoidance of yielding extraordinary values in projected population, especially in the case of long-term projection; and third, it does not require that in order for demographics to smooth they must follow the specific distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is called “small number problem” in spatial epidemiology (Haining et al. 2010).

  2. 2.

    There are some studies that analyze geographical phenomena by using spatial filtering techniques different from taking simply moving averages. Please see, for example, Griffith (2003) for details.

  3. 3.

    The DAR is calculated by directly using mortality observed in each area, and often shows an extraordinary value. This undesirable phenomenon was called ill-determined rate by Mosteller and Tukey (1977); (Tango 1988).

  4. 4.

    When smoothing demographics by the method of type 3, that is, empirical Bayes estimation, we usually assume that the demographics follow Poisson distribution that shows the probability of very rare phenomenon. DARs and SMRs obviously follow Poisson distribution. As mentioned later, however, since CCRs indispensable for small area population projection cannot be considered as such probability, the smoothing of CCRs through type 3 requires close attention.

  5. 5.

    The method of “median” based smoothing does not necessarily reflect demographics of an object area and cannot be considered as a desirable one, therefore this chapter excludes this method from discussion.

  6. 6.

    The reason this variable takes the two different forms is that we must avoid division by zero in calculating the population potential of area i, whose distance from area i is naturally zero.

  7. 7.

    Regarding the oldest age class, we must utilize the formula different slightly from equation [19]. Please see, for example, Smith et al. 2002 for details. If the fertility of women aged 15–19 and 40–49 shows a very low value as observed in Japan, it will be better to replace f i,t (15, 49) with f i,t (20, 39) in the calculation of CWRs.

  8. 8.

    In this simulation, f i,t (20, 39) is used for the calculation of CWRs for the reason mentioned in footnote 7.

  9. 9.

    This is the method of projecting population on the hypothesis that CCRs and CWRs of all small areas conform entirely to those of the municipality constituted by them.

  10. 10.

    The author also described the brief manual for Japanese version of this system (Inoue 2016). This system is based on ArcGIS Online®, which is the Internet GIS system provided by Esri Corporation, so the interface and design of this website are changeable with updates of ArcGIS Online. In addition, please pay attention to possibility that the author may update its contents.

References

  • Anselin, L., Lozano, N., & Koschinsky, J. (2006). Rate transformations and smoothing. Spatial Analysis Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D., & Kaldor, J. (1987). Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics, 43(3), 671–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, G., & Ghosh, M. (2012). Small area shrinkage estimation. Statistical Science, 27, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1973). Stein’s estimation rule and its competitors: an empirical Bayes approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(341), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1975). Data analysis using Stein’s estimator and its generalizations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, P. J., MacGibbon, B., & Tomberlin, T. J. (1997). Empirical Bayes estimators of small area proportions in multistage designs. Statistica Sinica, 7, 1065–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, R. E., & Herriot, R. A. (1979). Estimates of income for small places: An application of James-Stein procedures to census data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, M., Kim, M. J., & Kim, D. H. (2008). Constrained Bayes and empirical Bayes estimation under random effects normal ANOVA model with balanced loss function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138(7), 2017–2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M. E., & Hoza, C. (1978). Small-area estimation with application to unemployment and housing estimates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(361), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: Gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R. P., Kerry, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2010). Geography, spatial data analysis, and geostatistics: An overview. Geographical Analysis, 42(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. H., & Perry, J. (1962). A short method for projecting population by age from one decennial census to another. Social Forces, 41(2), 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., Smith, T. M. F., & Tomberlin, T. J. (1979). A model-based approach to estimation for small subgroups of a population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, T. (2007). The concept of population potential and small area population statistics. Statistical Magazine, 58(12), 12–16. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, T. (2014). A new method of estimating small area demographics using population potential. Working Paper Series, Institute of Economic Research, Aoyama Gakuin University 2014(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, T. (2016). Development of the web system of small area population projection for whole Japan. Expertise in Statistics and Research for Leaders and Administrators (ESTRELA) 262, 2–9. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubokawa, T. (2013a). Constrained empirical Bayes estimator and its uncertainty in normal linear mixed models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 122, 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubokawa, T. (2013b). The benchmark problem on small area estimation and error estimate of constrained empirical Bayes estimation. CIRJE Research Report Series, CIRJE-R-12, 143–165. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laake, P. (1979). A predictive approach to subdomain estimation in finite populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 355–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, T. A. (1984). Estimating a population of parameter values using Bayes and empirical Bayes methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(386), 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGibbon, B., & Tomberlin, T. J. (1989). Small area estimates of proportions via empirical Bayes techniques. Survey Methodology, 15, 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritz, J. S. (1969). Empirical Bayes estimation for the Poisson distribution. Biometrika, 56(2), 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. J. (1991). Mapping disease and mortality rates using empirical Bayes estimators. Applied Statistics, 40(2), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mfungahema, R., & Kitamura, T. (1997). The significance of population potential at the local level and in rural areas: A case of Okayama and Tottori prefectures in Japan. Journal of Rural Planning Association, 16(3), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. N. (1983). Parametric empirical Bayes inference: Theory and applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(381), 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1977). Data analysis and regression: A second course in statistics. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, D. C. (1980). Potential models in human geography: Concepts and techniques in modern geography, volume 26 of concepts and techniques in modern geography (Study Group in Quantitative Methods). Institute of British Geographers, University of East Anglia, Norwich: GeoBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki, N. (1991). Stein-type shrinkage estimators and their applications. Japanese Journal of Applied Statistics, 20(2), 59–76. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K., Tayman, J., & Swanson, D. A. (2002). State and local population projections: Methodology and analysis. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K., Tayman, J., & Swanson, D. A. (2013). A practitioner’s guide to state and local population projections. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. Q. (1947). Empirical mathematical rules concerning the distribution and equilibrium of population. Geographical Review, 37(3), 461–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. A., & Tayman, J. (2012). Subnational population estimates. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. A., Schlottmann, A., & Schmidt, B. (2010). Forecasting the population of census tracts by age and sex: An example of the Hamilton-Perry method in action. Population Research and Policy Review, 29(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tango, T. (1988). Empirical Bayes estimation for mortality indices: Applications to disease mapping. Japanese Journal of Applied Statistics, 17(2), 81–96. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocalis, T. R. (1978). Changing theoretical foundations of the gravity concept of human interactions. In B. J. L. Berry (Ed.), Perspectives in geography 3: The nature of change in geographical ideas (pp. 67–124). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsutakawa, R. K., Shoop, G. L., & Marienfeld, C. J. (1985). Empirical Bayes estimation of cancer mortality rates. Statistics in Medicine, 4(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warntz, W. (1964). A new map of the surface of population potentials for the United States, 1960. Geographical Review, 54(2), 170–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is a result of a study that received financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science by grant-in-aid (grant number: 25370919 and 16H03525). The author deeply appreciates the assistance of Mr. Atsushi Kajimoto (Esri Japan Corporation) for constructing the online system “The Web System of Small Area Population Projection for the Whole Japan.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Inoue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Inoue, T. (2017). A New Method for Estimating Small Area Demographics and Its Application to Long-Term Population Projection. In: Swanson, D. (eds) The Frontiers of Applied Demography. Applied Demography Series, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43329-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43329-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43329-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics