Abstract
Adaptive randomization (e.g. response-adaptive (RA) randomization) has become popular in phase II clinical research because of its flexibility and efficiency, which also have the patient centric advantage of assigning fewer patients to inferior treatment arms. However, these designs lack a mechanism to actively control the imbalance of prognostic factors, i.e. covariates that substantially affect the study outcome. Improving the balance of patient characteristics among the treatment arms could potentially increases the statistical power of the trial. We propose a phase II clinical trial design that is response-adaptive and that also actively balances the covariates across treatment arms. We then incorporate this method into a sequential RA randomization design such that the resulting design skews the allocation probability to the better treatment arm, and also controls the imbalance of the prognostic factors across the arms. The proposed method extends the existing randomization procedures which either requires polytomizing continuous covariates or uses fixed allocation probability to adjust covariates imbalance. Simulation studies are also conducted to examine the operating characteristics of the design with existing approaches to illustrate the recommendation for clinical practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pocock, S. J., & Simon, R. (1975). Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics, 103–115.
Wei, L. J. (1978). An application of an urn model to the design of sequential controlled clinical trials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 559–563.
Atkinson, A. C. (1982). Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors. Biometrika, 69(1), 61–67.
Signorini, D. F., Leung, O., Simes, R. J., Beller, E., Gebski, V. J., & Callaghan, T. (1993). Dynamic balanced randomization for clinical trials. Statistics in medicine, 12(24), 2343–2350.
Heritier, S., Gebski, V., & Pillai, A. (2005). Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials. Statistics in medicine, 24(24), 3729–3741.
Scott, N. W., McPherson, G. C., Ramsay, C. R., & Campbell, M. K. (2002). The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review. Controlled clinical trials, 23(6), 662–674.
McEntegart, D. J. (2003). The pursuit of balance using stratified and dynamic randomization techniques: an overview. Drug Information Journal, 37(3), 293–308.
Ning, J., & Huang, X. (2010). Response‐adaptive randomization for clinical trials with adjustment for covariate imbalance. Statistics in medicine, 29(17), 1761–1768.
Yuan, Y., Huang, X., & Liu, S. (2011). A Bayesian response‐adaptive covariate‐balanced randomization design with application to a leukemia clinical trial. Statistics in medicine, 30(11), 1218–1229.
Lin, J., Lin, L., & Sankoh, S. (2016). A general overview of adaptive randomization design for clinical trials. Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics, 7, 1–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lin, J., Lin, LA., Sankoh, S. (2016). A Phase II Trial Design with Bayesian Adaptive Covariate-Adjusted Randomization. In: Lin, J., Wang, B., Hu, X., Chen, K., Liu, R. (eds) Statistical Applications from Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine to Finance and Business Analytics. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42568-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42568-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42567-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42568-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)