Abstract
This chapter connects the concept of eudaimonia with Karl Marx’s concept of ‘species being’. It contends that whereas, for Aristotle, eudaimonia represented the natural purpose of a privileged minority of humanity; for Marx, it represented the historical and developmental purpose of an entire species, radically characterised by its specific forms of consciousness, work and sociality. The chapter additionally considers how in the light of subsequent historical events, Hannah Arendt saw eudaimonia in terms of what it means for a human being to live well in common with others. Seizing on the idea that in the contemporary era social policy and social development are, or ought to be, concerned not only with living well, but living better, the chapter seeks to build upon Marx’s particular concept of species being as the basis for a life-first ethic: an ethic that seeks consensually to define and prioritise human fulfilment and the essential meaning of social welfare and human well-being.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
My treatment here of Aristotle will be brief and thinly referenced, since his work is extensively discussed elsewhere in this volume.
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left Books.
Arendt, H. (1951). The burden of our time. London: Secker & Warburg.
Arendt, H. (1968). Life of mind: Vol. 2 willing. London: Secker & Warburg.
Arendt, H. (1978). Life of mind: Vol. 1 thinking. London: Secker & Warburg.
Aristotle. (c. 350 BCE). Eudemian ethics – Books I. II and VIII (1982 edn. M. Woods, Tran.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Beck, W., Van der Maesen, L., & Walker, A. (Eds.). (1997). The social quality of Europe. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Benton, T. (1988). Humanism = specieism: Marx on humans and animals. Radical Philosophy, 50, 4–18.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Chan, J. (1999). A Confucian perspective on human rights for contemporary China. In J. Bauer & D. Bell (Eds.), The east Asian challenge for human rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chitty, A. (2009). Species-being and capital. In A. Chitty & M. McIvor (Eds.), Karl Marx and contemporary philosophy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davy, U. (2013). Social citizenship going international: Changes in the reading of UN-sponsored economic and social rights. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(Supplement 1), S15–S31.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2006). The rise of the global left: The world social forum and beyond. London: Zed Books.
Deacon, B. (2007). Global social policy and governance. London: Sage.
Dean, H. (2000). Towards an embodied account of welfare. In K. Ellis & H. Dean (Eds.), Social policy and the body: Transitions in corporeal discourse. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
Dean, H. (2012). Social policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Dean, H. (2014). Life first welfare, the need/right to work and the scope for a ‘eudemonic ethic’ of social security. In M. Keune & A. Serrano (Eds.), Deconstructing flexicurity and developing alternative approaches: Towards new concepts and approaches for employment and social policy. London: Routledge.
Dean, H. (2015). Social rights and human welfare. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Dean, H., & Khan, Z. (1997). Muslim perspectives on welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 26(2).
Depew, D. (1992). The polis transfigured: Aristotle’s politics and Marx’s critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right. In G. McCarthy (Ed.), Marx and Aristotle: Nineteenth century German social theory and classical antiquity. Annapolis, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, P. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: Recommendations for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 409–427.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Farnsworth, K., & Irving, Z. (Eds.). (2015). Social policy in times of austerity. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Ferguson, C. (1999). Global social policy: Human rights and social justice. London: Department for International Development.
Foster, J. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366.
Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Friere, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Fromm, E. (1961). Marx’s concept of man. New York: Frederick Unger Publishing.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Basic Books.
Gilbert, A. (1992). Marx’s moral realism: Eudaimonism and moral progress. In G. McCarthy (Ed.), Marx and Aristotle: Nineteenth century German social theory and classical antiquity. Annapolis, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Harari, Y. (2011). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. London: Vintage.
Hegel, G. (1805–1806). Jena lectures on the philosophy of spirit. In L. Rauch (Ed.), Hegel and the human spirit (1983). Dettroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Hegel, G. (1821). In A. Wood (Ed.), Elements of the philosophy of rights (1991st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heller, A. (1974). The theory of need in Marx. London: Alison & Busby.
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
International Labour Organisation (ILO). (1999). Report of ILO Director-General: Decent work, international labour conference, 87th session. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.
Jordan, B. (2008). Welfare and well-being: Social value in public policy. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Kabeer, N. (2004). Globalization, labor standards, and women’s rights: Dilemmas of collective (in)action in an interdependent world. Feminist Economics, 10(1), 3–35.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.
Lockwood, D. (1996). Civic integration and class formation. British Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 531–550.
M’Baye, K. (1972). Le Droit au Développement comme un droit de l’Homme. Revue des Droits de l’Homme, 5, 503–505.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.
Margolis, J. (1992). Praxis and meaning: Marx’s species being and Aristotle’s political animal. In G. McCarthy (Ed.), Marx and Aristotle: Nineteenth century German social theory and classical antiquity. Annapolis, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Márkus, G. (2014). Marxism & anthropology: The concept of ‘human essence’ in the philosophy of Marx (special, ed.). Sydney, Australia: Modem-Verlag.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. In T. Marshall & T. Bottomore (Eds.), Citizenship and social class (1992nd ed.). London: Pluto.
Marx, K. (1844). Economic and philosophical manuscripts. In L. Colletti (Ed.), Early writings (1975th ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Marx, K. (1845). Theses from Fuerbach (extract from). In T. Bottomore & M. Rubel (Eds.), Karl Marx: Selected writings in sociology and social philosophy. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Marx, K. (1857). Grundrisse (1973rd ed.). London: Penguin.
Marx, K. (1887). Capital (1970th ed., Vol. I). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
McCarthy, G. (Ed.). (1992). Marx and Aristotle: Nineteenth century German social theory and classical antiquity. Annapolis, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Miller, R. (1992). Marx and Aristotle: A kind of consequentialism. In G. McCarthy (Ed.), Marx and Aristotle: Nineteenth century German social theory and classical antiquity. Annapolis, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Parekh, S. (2008). Hannah Arendt and the challenge of modernity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Ramose, M. (2003). Globalisation and ubuntu. In P. Coetzee & A. Roux (Eds.), The African philosophy reader. London: Routledge.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minnesota, MD: University of Minnesota.
Russell, B. (1961). History of western philosophy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Sahlins, M. (1974). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine.
Searle, J. (1997). The mystery of consciousness. London: Granta.
Sen, A. (1982). Equality of what? In A. Sen (Ed.), Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: Norton.
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care. London: Routledge.
Smith, S. (1992). The origins of the dialectic: Hegel’s appropriation of the ancient skeptics. In G. McCarthy (Ed.), Marx and Aristotle: Nineteenth century German social theory and classical antiquity. Annapolis, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Smyth, B. (2012). Review of Zurn, F. and Schmidt Am Busch, H-C (Eds.) The philosophy of recognition. Marx & Philosophy Review of Books. Retrieved December 2, 2015, from, http://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2012/632
Soper, K. (1981). On human needs. Brighton, UK: Harvester.
Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
Stenner, P., & Taylor, D. (2008). Psychosocial welfare: Reflections on an emerging field. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 415–437.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. See www.stiglitz-sen-firoussi.fr
Titmuss, R. (1970). The gift relationship. London: Allen and Unwin.
Tronto, J. (1994). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
Turner, B. (2006). Vulnerability and human rights. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
Twine, F. (1994). Citizenship and social rights: The interdependence of self and society. London: Sage.
United Nations General Assembly. (2000). United nations millennium declaration (resolution 2 session 55). New York: UN.
van der Maesen, L., & Walker, A. (2014). The development of social quality between 1994 and 2014 (Working Paper Series nr. 13). Amsterdam: IASQ. www.socialquality.org
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weisman, T. (2014). Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx. Annapolis, MD: Lexington Books.
Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Woodiwiss, A. (2005). Human rights. London: Routledge.
World Bank. (2001). World development report 2000/2001. Retrieved from Oxford.
Yarbrough, J., & Stern, P. (1981). Vita activa and vita contemplativa: Reflections on Hannah Arendt’s political thought in life of mind. The Review of Politics, 43(3), 323–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dean, H. (2016). Eudaimonia and ‘Species Being’: A Marxist Perspective. In: Vittersø, J. (eds) Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42443-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42445-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)