Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Planning: A Methodological Toolkit

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2016 (ICCSA 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9786))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodological appraisal developed in order to face the recurring conflict between environment and economic development assessed in a specific implementation context: the Val d’Agri in Basilicata (Italy), where protection and exploitation requests include the safeguard of particular traditions and culture of communities located in inland areas of the Apennines, as well as environmental resources (natural, agricultural, historical and artistic resources). In this view, we selected strategies in order to promote innovation required by the self-centred part of the development and we referred to a right of rationality of choices, based on: equity, efficiency and conservation of resources; accountability instruments and uncertainty sharing means to which connect the integrated cycle of assessment/governance. The Logical Framework Matrix (LFM) was proposed for this purpose and, through the derived call, applicants will have to work on the basis of a set of procedures oriented to the construction of ended and integrated supply chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Among the authors, besides the best known McLoughlin [2] and Ghadwick [3], we find a very interesting reconstruction of Wegener [4], proposing a survay 10 years later Lee’s article [5].

  2. 2.

    Cfr. the conspicuous production of Roy Benard’s group with reference to what was produced in the field of understanding and modeling of decision processes. Among others, see Roy [9]; Ostanello and Tsukias [10]; Las Casas [11].

  3. 3.

    Lack of facilities or organizations, but also of efficiency, equity and respect of non-renewable resources.

References

  1. Faludi, A.: A Decision-Centred View of Environmental Planning. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McLoughlin, J.B.: Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach, p. 329. Faber, London (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chadwick, G.: A Systems View of Planning: Towards a Theory of Urban and Regional Planning Process. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wegener, M.: Operational urban models: state of the art. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 59, 17–29 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, D.B.: Requiem for large-scale models. J. Am. Inst. Planners 39, 163–178 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Friend, J.K., Jessop, W.N.: Local Government and Strategic Choice: An Operational Research Approach to the Processes of Public Planning. Tavistock Publications, London (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, A.: New roles for urban models: planning for the long term. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci. 3(1), 48–57 (2016). doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1109474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Las Casas, G.B., Sansone, A.: Un approccio rinnovato alla razionalità nel piano. In: Depilano, G. (a cura di) Politiche e strumenti per il recupero urbano. EdicomEdizioni, Monfalcone (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roy, B.: Méthodologie Multicritère d’Aide à la Décision. Economica, Paris (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ostanello, A., Tsoukias, A.: An explicative model of’ public interorganizational interactions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 70, 67–82 (1993). North-Holland

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Las Casas, G.B.: criteri multipli e aiuto alle decisioni nel processo di piano (2010). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268262221_CRITERI_MULTIPLI_E_AIUTO_ALLE_DECISIONI_NEL_PROCESSO_DI_PIANO. Accessed 29 Apr 2016

  12. Goverment Performance and Result Act, United States (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Archibugi, F.: la pianificazione sistemica: strumento della innovazione manageriale nella pa, negli usa e in europa (2002). http://win.progettosynergie.it/pianificazionestrategica/formarchibugi/L0.1/letture/pianificazione_sistemica.pdf. Accessed Apr 2016

  14. Las Casas, G.B., Tilio, L.: Seismic risk reduction: a proposal for identify elements enhancing resilience of territorial systems. In: Popovich, S., Elisei, Z., (eds.) Proceedings REAL CORP 2012 Tagungsband 14–16 May 2012, Schwechat (2012). ISBN: 978-3-9503110-2-0

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly, G.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Casas, G.B., Tilio, L., Tsoukiàs, A.: Public decision processes: the interaction space supporting planner’s activity. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 466–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zoppi, C.: Ontologie ed analisi territoriale: un’introduzione al tema. Scienze Regionali 2011(2), 121–123 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rabino, G.: Le ontologie nella società dell’informazione. Scienze Regionali 2011(2), 125–131 (2011). doi:10.3280/SCRE2011-002006

    Google Scholar 

  19. Las Casas, G.B., Scorza, F.: Redo: applicazioni ontologiche per la valutazione nella programmazione regionale. Scienze Regionali 10(2), 133–140 (2011). doi:10.3280/SCRE2011-002007

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scorza, F., Casas, G.B., Murgante, B.: That’s ReDO: ontologies and regional development planning. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 640–652. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruber, T.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 43(5–6), 907–928 (1995). doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. UsAid Guidelines, Australian Agency for International Development (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. European Commission: Europe Aid Co-operation Office General Affairs Evaluation. Manual Project Cycle Management, Bruxelles (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. NORAD (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation): The Logical Framework Approach (LFA) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Las Casas, G.B., Scorza, F.: Un approccio “context-based” e “valutazione integrata” per il futuro della programmazione operativa regionale in Europa. In: Lo Sviluppo Territoriale Nell’economia Della Conoscenza: Teorie, Attori Strategie. Collana Scienze Regionali, vol. 41 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aune, J.B.: Logical Framework Approach. Development Methods and Approaches, 214 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bakewell, O., Garbutt, A.: The Use and Abuse of the Logical Framework Approach, p. 27. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Stockholm (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Coleman, G.: Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Proj. Appraisal 2, 251–259 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Las Casas, G.B.: L’etica della Razionalità. In: Urbanistica e Informazioni, vol 144, (1995). ISSN: 0392-5005

    Google Scholar 

  30. Las Casas, G., Murgante, B., Scorza, F.: Regional local development strategies benefiting from open data and open tools and an outlook on the renewable energy sources contribution. In: Papa, R., Fistola, R. (eds.) Smart Energy in the Smart City, pp. 275–290. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, 10, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, 85100, Potenza, Italy

    Giuseppe Las Casas & Francesco Scorza

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Las Casas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Scorza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Scorza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia , Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata , Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Covenant University , Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  4. University of Minho , Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A. C. Rocha

  5. Polytechnic University , Bari, Italy

    Carmelo M. Torre

  6. Monash University , Clayton, Victoria, Australia

    David Taniar

  7. Kyushu Sangyo University , Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  8. Saint Petersburg State University , Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Elena Stankova

  9. Beijing University of Posts & Telecommunication , Beijing, China

    Shangguang Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Casas, G.L., Scorza, F. (2016). Sustainable Planning: A Methodological Toolkit. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2016. ICCSA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42084-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42085-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation