Skip to main content

An Eye Tracking Experiment on Strategies to Minimize the Redundancy and Split Attention Effects in Scientific Graphs and Diagrams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design for Inclusion

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 500))

Abstract

The focus of this study is investigating efficiency of coding and grouping methods in reducing split attention effect in scientific graphs and diagrams by applying local changes in the structure of scientific materials. The diagrams and graphs are regularly used in the structure of materials along with textual explanation to provide supplementary information and insight to the readers and is referred as redundancy principle. In some cases, the redundant presentation of visual and textual content could lead to split attention effect and cognitive overload. Although, multimedia learning theory claims that in order to enhance learning, information should be presented in multi-mode format the design and implementation of the multi-modal presentation is of great importance. Having incredible flexibility, if multimedia elements are not applied properly, they cause confusion and adversely affect comprehension of the readers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ginns, P.: Meta-analysis of the modality effect (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38, 43–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carney, R.N., Levin, J.R.: Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 14, 5–26 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer, R.E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., Mars, R.: A generative theory of textbook design: using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 43, 31–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayres, P., Sweller, J.: The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 134–146. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Owens, P., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and music instruction. Educ. Psychol. 28, 29–45 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarmizi, R., Sweller, J.: Guidance during mathematical problem solving. J. Educ. Psychol. 80, 424–436 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 62, 233–246 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Florax, M., Ploetzner, R.: What contributes to the split-attention effect? The role of text segmentation, picture labelling, and spatial proximity. Learn. Instr. 20, 216–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, T.C., Lin, Y.C., Tsai, M.J., Paas, F.: Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments. Comput. Educ. 58, 172–180 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., Bokosmaty, S., Paas, F., Chandler, P.: Computer-based learning of geometry from integrated and split-attention worked examples: the power of self-management. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18, 89–99 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Majooni, A., Masood, M., Akhavan, A.: Scientific visualizations based on integrated model of text and picture comprehension via eye-tracking. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 52–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kahneman, D., Beatty, J.: Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154, 1583–1585 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klingner, J., Kumar, R., Hanrahan, P.: Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Di Stasi, L.L., Antolí, A., Cañas, J.J.: Evaluating mental workload while interacting with computer-generated artificial environments. Entertain. Comput. 4, 63–69 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iqbal, S., Adamczyk, P.: Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 311–320 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stern, J.A., Boyer, D., Schroeder, D.: Blink rate: a possible measure of fatigue. Hum. Factors. 36, 285–297 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fukuda, K., Stern, J., Brown, T., Russo, M.: Cognition, blinks, eye-movements, and pupillary movements during performance of a running memory task. Aviat. Sp. Environ. Med. 76, 75–85 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Benedetto, S., Pedrotti, M., Minin, L., Baccino, T., Re, A., Montanari, R.: Driver workload and eye blink duration. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 14, 199–208 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Recarte, M.A., Pérez, E., Conchillo, A., Nunes, L.M.: Mental workload and visual impairment: differences between pupil, blink, and subjective rating. Span. J. Psychol. 11, 374–385 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia, Centre of Instructional Technology and Multimedia (Grant No 1001/PMEDIA/817072).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azam Majooni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Majooni, A., Masood, M., Akhavan, A. (2016). An Eye Tracking Experiment on Strategies to Minimize the Redundancy and Split Attention Effects in Scientific Graphs and Diagrams. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Kercher, P. (eds) Advances in Design for Inclusion. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 500. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41962-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41962-6_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41961-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41962-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics