Abstract
This study examines the effect of body armor fit on marksmanship performance. Specifically, (1) does wearing body armor affect marksmanship performance, and (2) does the fit of the armor affect marksmanship performance. Fifteen male Soldiers participated in a marksmanship performance task using a weapon simulator in four different body armor configurations (no armor, initial fit, increased and decreased size). Accuracy (closeness to target center), precision (shot group tightness), and speed (transition time) were measured. Accuracy and precision were not significantly different regardless of body armor fit. However, speed was degraded in the initial fit body armor size and the increased size configurations relative to the baseline and decreased size configurations. In other words, in the decreased size, Soldiers engaged targets as quickly as when not wearing body armor, indicating body armor fit may impede Soldier’s ability to transition between targets, thereby impacting mission performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier, Last retrieved February 25, 2016 from http://www.peosoldier.army.mil/portfolio/#81
Hasselquist, L., Bensel, C., Corner, B., Gregorczyk, K., Schiffman, J.: Understanding the physiological, biomechanical, and performance effects of body armor use. In: Proceedings of the Army Science Conference (26th) Held in Orlando, Florida, Dec 2008
Headquarters, Department of the Army, Counterinsurgency, FM 3–24, MCWP 3-33.5. Dec 2006
Gordon, C.C., Blackwell, C.L., Bradtmiller B., Parham, J.L., Barrientos, P. Paquette, S.P., Corner, B.D., Carson, J.M., Venezia, J.C. Rockwell, B.M., Mucher, M, Kristensen, S.: 2010–2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics. (Technical Report (Natick/TR-15/007). U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA 01760-2646 (2014)
McNamara, J., Burcham, P., Ortega, S., Hennessy, E.: Weapon simulator test methodology investigation: comparison of live fire and weapon simulator test methodologies and the effects of clothing and individual equipment on marksmanship (Technical Report—TBD). U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center: Natick, MA. (In Press)
Johnson, R.F.: Statistical Measures of Marksmanship. (USARIEM Technical Note TN-01/2). U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760–5007 (2001)
Schmidt, R., Lee, T.: Motor Control and Learning; A Behavioral Emphasis, 3rd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL (1999)
Mauchly, J.W.: Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 11(2), 204–209 (1940)
Girden, E.: ANOVA: Repeated measures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage (1992). Recited from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauchly’s_sphericity_test#cite_note-8, Last retrieved 26 Feb 2016
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC) research program 14-041.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Choi, H.J., Blake Mitchell, K., Garlie, T., McNamara, J., Hennessy, E., Carson, J. (2016). Effects of Body Armor Fit on Marksmanship Performance. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41693-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41694-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)