Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arctic Futures: Agency and Assessing Assessments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arctic Environmental Modernities

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History ((PSWEH))

Abstract

The future is a common theme in discussions of the Arctic, whether in media, policy, or scientific communications. The future is not a given, and there are several possible futures that different actors strive to enable at any given time. At present considerable attention is given to monolithic “drivers” of change in this region, including melting sea ice, technological development, and global resource geopolitics; and although this discourse is far from new (Doel et al. 2014b), the end of the Cold War and the amplification of climate and global change have reframed the discussion (Christensen et al. 2013). The media has played a large role in propagating the “drivers” discourse, usually understating the role of human agency. While recognizing that these “driving” factors are important, this chapter will analyze some of this “future-talk”, in relation to the future of the Arctic. We would argue that there is considerable discursive power (Foucault 2002) in these images of the future, which explains why they are so visible and articulated with such fervor. It is not our intention to suggest that this talking about the future in and of itself constructs the future that actually unfolds. Rather, we hold that the genres of future-talk are closely connected to real interests connected to particular versions of Arctic futures.

No other region of the world has as many scientific assessments per capita as the Arctic, Nina Wormbs and Sverker Sörlin posit in this chapter. This extensive assessment industry has a long history and is continuing to influence policy and politics in the region, especially with respect to questions of sustainability, resilience, and resource extraction in an era of anthropogenic climate change. Reports such as the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP, 1997) and the Arctic Resilience Interim Report (2013), Wormbs and Sörlin show, generate a limited view of environmental and societal “drivers” in the Arctic region, often with little concern for social and cultural complexity. Wormbs and Sörlin are particularly concerned with the role of science in the production of certain kinds of “future-talk” that are manifested in these assessments. This chapter argues that real world interests and potential conflicts are being delegated to the scientific community, which is, willingly or unwillingly, serving as a putatively neutral and non-political quasi-authority on Arctic futures.This chapter analyzes the theoretical and methodological paradigms that have informed Arctic assessments in the past and the predictions for the future these reports have generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Work Cited

  • ACIA. 2004. Arctic climate impact assessment – Scientific report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahearne, Gerard. 2013. Towards an ecological civilization: A Gramscian strategy for a new political subject. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 9(1): 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMAP. 1997. Arctic pollution issues: A state of the Arctic environment report. Oslo: AMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Arctic pollution 2002: Persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, radioactivity, human health, changing pathways. Oslo: AMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Arctic climate issues 2011: Changes in Arctic snow, water, ice and permafrost. SWIPA 2011 overview report. Oslo: AMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARR. 2013. Arctic resilience: Interim report 2013. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute and Stockholm Resilience Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avango, Dag, Annika E. Nilsson, and Peder Roberts. 2013. Assessing Arctic futures: Voices, resources, governance. Polar Journal 3(2): 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Silke. 2011. Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation. Regional Environmental Change 11: 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Peter D. 2011. Scientific advice for policy in the United States: Lessons from the National Academies and the Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. In The politics of scientific advice: Institutional design for quality assurance, ed. Justus Lentsch, and Peter Weingart, 297–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, Max T. 2011. Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, Noel, William M. Adams, John Barry, Daniel Brockington, Bram Büscher, Esteve Corbera, David Demeritt, Rosaleen Duffy, Ulrike Felt, Katja Neves, Peter Newell, Luigi Pellizzoni, Kate Rigby, Paul Robbins, Libby Robin, Deborah Bird Rose, Andrew Ross, David Schlosberg, Sverker Sörlin, Paige West, Mark Whitehead, and Brian Wynne. 2014. Changing the intellectual climate. Nature Climate Change 4(9): 763–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Miyase, Annika E. Nilsson, and Nina Wormbs (ed). 2013. Media and Arctic climate politics. Breaking the ice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. 1993. Gramsci, hegemony, and international relations: An essay in method. In Gramsci, historical materialism, and international relations, ed. Stephen Gill, 49–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, Klaus, and Richard C. Powell (ed). 2014. Polar geopolitics: Knowledges, resources and legal regimes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doel, Ronald E., Robert Marc Friedman, Julia Lajus, Sverker Sörlin, and Urban Wråkberg. 2014a. Strategic Arctic science: National interests in building natural knowledge – Interwar era through the Cold War. Journal of Historical Geography 42: 60–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doel, Ronald E., Urban Wråkberg, and Suzanne Zeller. 2014b. Science, environment, and the New Arctic. Journal of Historical Geography 42: 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, Aant. 1996. UNESCO and the politics of international cooperation in the realm of science. In Les sciences coloniales 2, ed. Patrick Petitjean, and Roland Waast, 91–132. Paris: Orstrom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, Charles. 2010. The future history of the Arctic. London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, Peter T. 1997. Accountability and assessment in a second decade: New looks or same old story? In Assessing impact, evidence and action, 7–22. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2002. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. London/New York: Routledge. Originally published as Michel Foucault. 1969. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen (ed). 1993. Gramsci, historical materialism, and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, Rebecca. 2005. Suffering for science: Reason and sacrifice in modern America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn, Sverker Sörlin, and Uffe Östergård. 2006. Den globala nationalismen: Nationalstatens historia och framtid, 2nd ed. (orig. 1998). Stockholm: SNS förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, Peter. 2013. International politics of the Arctic: Coming in from the cold. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, Mike. 2011. Meet the humanities. Nature Climate Change 1: 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila, and Brian Wynne. 1998. Science and decision making. In Human choice and climate change, ed. Steve Rayner, and Elizabeth L. Malone, 1–87. Columbus: Battelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskitalo, E.Carina.H. 2004. Negotiating the Arctic: The construction of an international region. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learned, William S., and Ben DeKalbe Wood. 1938. The student and his knowledge. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Clark A., and Paul N. Edwards. 2001. Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, Annika E. 2007. A changing Arctic climate: Science and policy in the Arctic climate impact assessment. Linköping: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, Susan. 2011. Knowledge, advice and influence: The role of the UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 1970–2009. In The politics of scientific advice: Institutional design for quality assurance, ed. Justus Lentsch, and Peter Weingart, 73–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, Roger A. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Michael. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robards, Martin D., Michael L. Schoon, Chanda L. Meek, and Nathan L. Engle. 2011. The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 21(2): 522–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bruce A. 1996. The Arctic environmental protection strategy and the New Arctic Council. Arctic Research of the United States 10: 2–8. http://arcticcircle.uconn.edu/NatResources/Policy/uspolicy1.html

  • Sarewitz, Daniel. 2000. Science and environmental policy: An excess of objectivity. In Earth matters: The earth sciences, philosophy, and the claims of community, ed. R. Frodeman, 79–98. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Normal science and limits on knowledge. Social Research 77(3): 997–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörlin, Sverker (ed). 2013. Science, geopolitics and culture in the polar region: Norden beyond borders. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Circumpolar science: Scandinavian approaches to the Arctic and the North Atlantic, ca. 1930 to 1960. Science in Context 27(2): 275–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. Audit culture: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government. 1992. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. National assessment of college student learning: Issues and concerns. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wormbs, Nina. 2015. The assessed Arctic: How monitoring can be silently normative. In The new Arctic, ed. Birgitta Evengard, Joan Nyman Larsen, and Øyvind Paasche, 291–301. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden

    Nina Wormbs & Sverker Sörlin

Authors
  1. Nina Wormbs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sverker Sörlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Lill-Ann Körber

  2. Department of Film and Media, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Scott MacKenzie

  3. School of Modern Languages, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Anna Westerståhl Stenport

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wormbs, N., Sörlin, S. (2017). Arctic Futures: Agency and Assessing Assessments. In: Körber, LA., MacKenzie, S., Westerståhl Stenport, A. (eds) Arctic Environmental Modernities. Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39116-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39116-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39115-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39116-8

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation