Skip to main content

Teachers Editing Textbooks: Transforming Conventional Connections Among Teachers, Textbook Authors, and Mathematicians

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematics Education in a Context of Inequity, Poverty and Language Diversity

Abstract

The M-TET (Mathematics Teachers Edit Textbooks) project invites mathematics teachers to collaborate in editing the textbooks they use in their classes as a means of transforming conventional connections among teachers, curriculum developers, and mathematicians into more productive connections. The unique aspects that characterize the work environment offered to teachers include the following: designing a textbook for a broad student population, producing a textbook by making changes to a textbook designed by expert curriculum developers, and consulting with professionals that are not part of the teachers’ usual milieu (textbook authors and mathematicians). This chapter explores the nature of the connections between teachers and textbook authors, and between teachers and mathematicians that participation in the M-TET project made possible, and it discusses what might be gained by offering such a work environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The M-TET project is part of the Rothschild-Weizmann Program for Excellence in Science Teaching, supported in part by the Caesarea Edmond Benjamin de Rothschild Foundation.

References

  • Adler, J., & Lerman, S. (2003). Getting the description right and making it count: Ethical practice in mathematics education research. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education, Part 2 (pp. 441–470). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2014). An analytic framework for describing teachers’ mathematics discourse in instruction. In 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhadanah, R., Friedlander, A., Hadas, N., Kiro, S., Koren, M., Osruso-Hagag, G., et al. (2011a). Integrated mathematics (Matematica meshulevet): 8th grade—part B (Blue track for levels A and B). Rehovot, Israel: The Weizmann Institute (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhadanah, R., Friedlander, A., Hadas, N., Kiro, S., Koren, M., Robinson, N., et al. (2011b). Integrated Mathematics (Matematica meshulevet): 8th grade—Part B (Green track for levels C and below). Rehovot, Israel: The Weizmann Institute (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H. (2002). Linking research and curriculum development. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 599–630). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T., & Even, R. (2011). Enacted types of algebraic activity in different classes taught by the same teacher. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 867–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics—The 15th ICMI Study. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Even, R., & Olsher, S. (2014). Teachers as participants in textbook development: The Integrated Mathematics Wiki-book Project. In L. Yeping & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 333–350). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633–646. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German Classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R., Dreyfus, T., Ben-Zvi, D., Friedlander, A., Hadas, N., Resnick, T., et al. (2002). Mathematics curriculum development for computerized environments: A designer-researcher-teacher-learner activity. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 657–694). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshota, M., & Adler, J. (2014). The analysis of teachers’ mobilisation of the textbook. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development (ICMT-2014) (pp. 291–296). Southampton, GB: University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2009). Math curriculum for grades 7-9. Retrieved from http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Tochniyot_Limudim/Math/Hatab/Mavo.doc (in Hebrew).

  • Olsher, S., & Even, R. (2014). Teachers editing textbooks: Changes suggested by teachers to the math textbook they use in class. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development (ICMT-2014). Southampton, GB: University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 152–170). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. R., & Senk, S. L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5), 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruhama Even .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Even, R., Ayalon, M., Olsher, S. (2016). Teachers Editing Textbooks: Transforming Conventional Connections Among Teachers, Textbook Authors, and Mathematicians. In: Phakeng, M., Lerman, S. (eds) Mathematics Education in a Context of Inequity, Poverty and Language Diversity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38824-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38824-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38823-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38824-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics