Abstract
In this chapter we explore how school geometry becomes a technology for the government of the self, and how the pedagogical devices of school geometry conduct students’ ways of thinking and acting. We contend that students, in their working with pedagogical devices, engage in a training process in which they learn to regulate their own conduct so that they perceive space through the trained eyes of reason provided by Euclidean, school geometry. Our contribution is an analysis of the power effects of school geometry in terms of the fabrication of children’s subjectivities towards the shaping of the desired child of society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, M., & Montecino, A. (2011). La problemática de la tridimensionalidad y su representación en el plano. In A. Ruiz & E. Mancera (Eds.), Proceedings of XIII Conferencia Interamericana de Educación Matemática (CIAEM-IACME). Brasil: Recife.
Andrade-Molina, M. (2015). GeometrĂa escolar: Una batalla entre razĂłn versus lĂłgica y razonamiento. Proceedings of XIV Conferencia Interamericana de EducaciĂłn Matemática (CIAEM-IACME). http://xiv.ciaem-iacme.org/index.php/xiv_ciaem/xiv_ciaem/paper/viewFile/1193/477.
Andrade-Molina, M., & Valero, P. (2015). The sightless eyes of reason: Scientific objectivism and school geometry. Proceedings of 9th Congress if European Research in Mathematics Education.
Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. (Vol. 2, pp. 843–908).
Blumenfeld, W. (1913). Untersuchungen über die scheinbare Größe im Sehraume. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 65, 241–404.
Boi, L. (2004). Questions regarding Husserlian geometry and phenomenology. a study of the concept of manifold and spatial perception. Husserl Studies, 20(3), 207–267.
BĂłrquez, E., & Setz, J. (2012). Matemática cuarto año de Enseñanza Media. GuĂa didáctica del docente. Santiago: Santillana.
Burgin, V. (1987). Geometry and abjection. AA Files, 35–41.
Clements, M. A. (2008). Spatial abilities, mathematics, culture, and the Papua New Guinea experience. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education: Major contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 97–106). New York: Springer.
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan.
Cotoi, C. (2011). Neoliberalism: A Foucauldian perspective. International Review of Social Research, 1(2), 109–124.
Crary, J. (1992). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Del Grande, J. (1990). Spatial sense. The Arithmetic Teacher, 37(6), 14–20.
Del Valle, J., Muñoz, G., & Santis, M. (2014). Matemática primer año de Enseñanza Media. Texto del Estudiante. Santiago: Ediciones SM Chile.
Diaz, J. D. (2014). Governing equality. European Education, 45(3), 35–50. doi:10.2753/EUE1056-4934450303.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.) New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Foucault, M. (1984). The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics, subjectivity and truth, essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 281–302). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Two lectures at Dartmouth. Political Theory, 21(2), 198–227.
Foucault, M. (1997). Technologies of the self. In M. Foucault & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 223–251). New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. (G. Burchell, Trans.) New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France 1977-1978 (G. Burchell, Ed., M. Senellart, F. Ewald, A. Fontana, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: Analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Study of Mathematics, 74, 163–183.
Hardy, L. H., Rand, G., & Rittler, M. (1951). Investigation of visual space: The Blumenfeld alleys. A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmology, 45(1), 53–63.
Hauptman, H. (2010). Enhancement of spatial thinking with Virtual Spaces 1.0. Computers and Education, 54(1), 123–135.
Kollosche, D. (2014). Mathematics and power: An alliance in the foundations of mathematics and its teaching. ZDM, 46(7), 1061–1072.
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 549–579.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Donald Nicholson-Smith Trans.) Oxford, UK, Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture and Society, 14(3), 49–64. doi:10.1080/089356902101242288.
Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Critical maths for innovative societies. The role of metacognitive pedagogies. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264223561-en.
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2004). Matemática. Programa de Estudio. Tercer Año Medio. Santiago: MINEDUC.
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2004a). Matemática. Programa de Estudio. Cuarto Año Medio. Santiago: MINEDUC.
Ministerio de EducaciĂłn de Chile. (2010). Mapas de Progreso del Aprendizaje. GeometrĂa. Santiago: MINEDUC.
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2011). Matemática. Programa de Estudio. Segundo Año Medio. Santiago: MINEDUC.
Muñoz, G., Jiménez, L., & Rupin, P. (2013). In F. Muñoz (Ed.), Texto Educación Matemática 2, Educación Media. Texto del estudiante. Edición especial para el Ministerio de Educación. Santiago: Ediciones SM Chile.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29–35.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Take the test. Sample questions from OECD’s PISA assessments, OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Connected minds: Technology and today’s learners, educational research and innovation. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264111011-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—student performance in mathematics, reading and science (revised ed., Vol. I, February 2014). Pisa: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.
Ortiz, A., Reyes, C., Valenzuela, M., & ChandĂa, E. (2012). Matemática primer año de Enseñanza Media. GuĂa didáctica del docente. Santiago: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
Prieto, G., & Velasco, A. D. (2010). Does spatial visualization ability improve after studying technical drawing? Quality and Quantity, 44(5), 1015–1024.
Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215–234). Rotterdam: Sense.
Rose, N. (1996). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason (pp. 37–64). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Scott, D. (1995). Colonial governmentality. Social text., 43, 191–220.
Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisited. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(5), 673–686.
Skordoulis, C., Vitsas, T., Dafermos, V., & Koleza, E. (2009). The system of coordinates as an obstacle in understanding the concept of dimension. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 253–272. doi:10.1007/s10763-008-9130-2.
Suppes, P. (1977). Is visual space Euclidean? Synthese, 35(4), 397–421.
Valero, P. (2011). Re-interpreting students’ interest in mathematics: Youth culture resisting Modern subjectification. In D. Di Paola & J. DĂez-Palomar (Eds.), 63th Commission Internatinale pour l’Etude et l’AmĂ©lioration de l’Enseignement des MathĂ©matiques (CIEAEM): Facilitating access and participation: mathematical practices inside and outside the classroom. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics) (pp. 72–83). Spain: Barcelona.
Valero, P., & GarcĂa, G. (2014). Matemáticas escolares y el gobierno del sujeto moderno (School mathematics and the governing of the Modern subject). Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 28(49), 491–515. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v28n49a02.
Valero, P., GarcĂa, G., Camelo, F., Mancera, G., & Romero, J. (2012). Mathematics education and the dignity of being: Original research. Pythagoras, 33(2), 1–9.
Valero, P., & Knijnik, G. (2015). Governing the modern, neoliberal child through ICT research in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(2), 34–39.
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Finding the missing piece: Blocks, puzzles, and shapes fuel school readiness. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(1), 7–13.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835.
Zañartu, M., Darrigrandi, F., & Ramos, M. (2012). Matemática segundo año de Enseñanza Media. GuĂa didáctica del docente. Santiago: Santillana.
Acknowledgments
This research is funded by the National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research, CONICYT PAI/INDUSTRIA 79090016, in Chile and by Aalborg University, in Denmark. This research also makes part of the NordForsk Center of Excellence “JustEd”. We would like to thank Elizabeth de Freitas, the reviewers and editors for their comments to previous drafts of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrade-Molina, M., Valero, P. (2017). The Effects of School Geometry in the Shaping of a Desired Child. In: Straehler-Pohl, H., Bohlmann, N., Pais, A. (eds) The Disorder of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34005-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34006-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)