Skip to main content

Co-creation in Living Labs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Living Labs

Abstract

Living Labs are places for open innovation where co-creation is a method for addressing real-life issues through the attribution of knowledge from science and society, the latter being a form of transdisciplinary social learning. In a Living Lab the representatives from business, society and academia, as well as citizens, have different value perceptions and propositions, providing heterogeneity across the stakeholder value spectrum. This provides a rich set of ideas and values for co-creation which can be used for both the operational phase and the integral shaping and creating the design for the physical infrastructure of the Living Lab itself. The use of co-creation workshops are demonstrated for ideation amongst the stakeholders for the HSB Living Lab. This is exemplified in the development of the social washing room which will be prototyped and tested in a fit-for-purpose multifunctional design space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baars, T. (2010). Experiential science; towards an integration of implicit and reflected practitioner-expert knowledge in the scientific development of organic farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, published on-line.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carew, A. L., & Wickson, F. (2010). The TD wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42, 1146–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDIO: Conceive Design Implement Operate (2015). Home. http://www.cdio.org/. (21 September 2015).

  • Franz, Y. (2015). Designing social living labs in urban research. info, 17(4), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn, G. H., Pohl, Ch., & Scheringer, M. (2003). Methodology of transdisciplinary Research. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) (Eds.), UNESCO and EOLSS Publishers. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn, G. H., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2008). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research, Ecological Economics, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. (2014). Co-creation: Moving towards a framework for creating innovation in the Triple Helix, Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N., & Coates, N. (2013). The meanings of co-creation. European Business Review, 25(1), 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to Education and Innovation. Policy Sciences, 1, 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2012). Towards innovation in Living Labs networks. Int. J. Product Development, 17(1/2), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, A. J., & Vanclay, J. K. (2011). Social learning: A knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy, 28, 574–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangyoku, M., Aragall, F., Serra, A., Sanchez, L. and Vuontisjarvi, H. (2014). ‘IDeALL: Investigating design-for-all and living-lab methods for engaging users in value co-creation’. 2014 International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (pp. 1–8), IEEE, Bergamo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdiciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobjörk, M. (2010). Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42, 866–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, C. (2008). From science of policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science and Policy, 11, 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosado, L., Kalmykova, Y., Hagy, S., Morrison, G., & Ostermeyer, Y. (2014). A living lab co-creation environment exemplifying Factor 10 improvements in a city district. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 8(2), 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicini, S., Bellini, S., & Sanna, A. (2013). User-driven service innovation in a smarter city Living Lab. International Conference on Service Science (pp. 254–259).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shea Hagy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hagy, S., Morrison, G.M., Elfstrand, P. (2017). Co-creation in Living Labs. In: Keyson, D., Guerra-Santin, O., Lockton, D. (eds) Living Labs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33526-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33527-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics