Skip to main content

Collaborative Learning Team Formation: A Cognitive Modeling Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9643))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With a number of students, the purpose of collaborative learning is to assign these students to the right teams so that the promotion of skills of each team member can be facilitated. Although some team formation solutions have been proposed, the problem of extracting more effective features to describe the skill proficiency of students for better collaborative learning is still open. To that end, we provide a focused study on exploiting cognitive diagnosis to model students’ skill proficiency for team formation. Specifically, we design a two-stage framework. First, we propose a cognitive diagnosis model SDINA, which can automatically quantify students’ skill proficiency in continuous values. Then, given two different objectives, we propose corresponding algorithms to form collaborative learning teams based on the cognitive modeling results of SDINA. Finally, extensive experiments demonstrate that SDINA could model the students’ skill proficiency more precisely and the proposed algorithms can help generate collaborative learning teams more effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are also studies about the automatic labeling of skills [7], which is beyond the scope of our research.

  2. 2.

    They will be publicly available after the paper acceptance.

  3. 3.

    Unlike the real-world datasets, the simulated ones only consist of students with values between 0 and 1 on some features rather than students’ test scores.

  4. 4.

    The latent factor getting by PMF has not been used here since it’s unexplainable.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Golshan, B., Terzi, E.: Grouping students in educational settings. In: SIGKDD, pp. 1017–1026. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christodoulopoulos, C.E., Papanikolaou, K.: Investigation of group formation using low complexity algorithms. In: Proceeding of PING, Workshop, pp. 57–60 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De La Torre, J.: Dina model and parameter estimation: a didactic. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 34(1), 115–130 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De La Torre, J.: The generalized dina model framework. Psychometrika 76(2), 179–199 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. DeCarlo, L.T.: On the analysis of fraction subtraction data: the dina model, classification, latent class sizes, and the q-matrix. APM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deshpande, M., Karypis, G.: Item-based top-N recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 22(1), 143–177 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Desmarais, M.C.: Mapping question items to skills with non-negative matrix factorization. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 13(2), 30–36 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DiBello, L.V., Roussos, L.A., Stout, W.: 31a review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models. Handb. Stat. 26, 979–1030 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Embretson, S.E., Reise, S.P.: Item response theory for psychologists. Psychology Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P.: The discussion method. The psychology of teaching methods, (75 ppt 1), pp. 166–216 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbs, G.: Learning in teams: a tutor guide. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., Boas, G., Liakou, E., Grigoriadou, M.: Forming homogeneous, heterogeneous and mixed groups of learners. In: Proceeding ICUM, pp. 33–40 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graf, S., Bekele, R.: Forming heterogeneous groups for intelligent collaborative learning systems with ant colony optimization. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 217–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hooper, S., Hannafin, M.J.: Cooperative cbi: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 4(4), 413–424 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang, G.-J., Yin, P.-Y., Hwang, C.-W., Tsai, C.-C., et al.: An enhanced genetic approach to composing cooperative learning groups for multiple grouping criteria. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11(1), 148–167 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lappas, T., Liu, K., Terzi, E.: Finding a team of experts in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th SIGKDD, pp. 467–476. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Q., Wang, P., Wang, W., Hu, H., Li, Z., Li, J.: An efficient K-means Clustering Algorithm on MapReduce. In: Bhowmick, S.S., Dyreson, C.E., Jensen, C.S., Lee, M.L., Muliantara, A., Thalheim, B. (eds.) DASFAA 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8421, pp. 357–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahdi, B., Fattaneh, T.: A semi-pareto optimal set based algorithm for grouping of students. In: ICELET, pp. 10–13. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mnih, A., Salakhutdinov, R.: Probabilistic matrix factorization. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 1257–1264 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ounnas, A., Davis, H., Millard, D.: A framework for semantic group formation. In: ICALT, pp. 34–38. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ozaki, K.: Dina models for multiple-choice items with few parameters considering incorrect answers. In: APM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice, vol. 14. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S.D., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. JEE 94(1), 87–101 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Štajner, T., Thomee, B., Popescu, A.-M., Pennacchiotti, M., Jaimes, A.: Automatic selection of social media responses to news. In: 19th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 50–58. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Toscher, A., Jahrer, M.: Collaborative filtering applied to educational data mining. In: KDD Cupp (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, R., Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, E., Su, Y., Chen, Z., Hu, G.: Cognitive modelling for predicting examinee performance. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1017–1024. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yannibelli, V., Amandi, A.: A deterministic crowding evolutionary algorithm to form learning teams in a collaborative learning context. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(10), 8584–8592 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by grants from the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (Grant No. 61325010), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61403358) and the Science and Technology Program for Public Wellbeing (Grant No. 2013GS340302). Qi Liu gratefully acknowledges the support of the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS and acknowledges the support of the CCF-Intel Young Faculty Researcher Program (YFRP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enhong Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liu, Y. et al. (2016). Collaborative Learning Team Formation: A Cognitive Modeling Perspective. In: Navathe, S., Wu, W., Shekhar, S., Du, X., Wang, S., Xiong, H. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9643. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32049-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32049-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32048-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32049-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics