Skip to main content

Fiscal Federalism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism

Abstract

The entry dwells on the concept of fiscal federalism taking a comparative constitutional law standpoint. After an initial reconstruction of the theories underlying its origin and evolution over time and space, the interdisciplinary dimension of the studies on fiscal federalism is explored in search of a (non-)definition. The entry then moves on to a comparative constitutional analysis through the investigation of the concept of financial constitution and later through a comparative legal analysis of the foundations of fiscal federalism. A case study approach is adopted and the current de jure and de facto allocation of financial and fiscal powers, as well as the intergovernmental (fiscal) institutions are examined, to figure out the functioning of financial relations among different levels of government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alber, Elisabeth. 2018. Intergovernmental financial relations: Institutions, rules, and praxis. In Comparing fiscal federalism, ed. Alice Valdesalici and Francesco Palermo, 223–273. Brill: Leide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosanio, Flavia, Paolo Balduzzi, and Chiara Peiti. 2018. Accountability and revenue assignment across levels of government: Rules, practices, and challenges. In Comparing fiscal federalism, ed. Alice Valdesalici and Francesco Palermo, 119–148. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, George. 2010. Fiscal federalism: A comparative introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S.H. 1997. A political Scientist’s view of fiscal federalism. In The political economy of fiscal federalism, ed. Wallace E. Oates, 21–46. Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Richard M. 1999. Rethinking subnational taxes: A new look at tax assignment. IMF working paper 165. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/1999/wp99165.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 2021.

  • ———. 2009. Tax assignment revisited. In Tax reform in the 21. Century: A volume in memory of Richard Musgrave, ed. J.G. Head et al., 441–470. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Richard M., and Vaillancourt, François. 1999. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blöchliger, Hansjörg, and David King. 2006. Less than you thought: The fiscal autonomy of sub-central governments. OECD Economic Studies 43: 155–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, Robin. 2007. Canada. In The practice of fiscal federalism: Comparative perspectives, ed. Anwar Shah and John Kincaid, 99–124. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey, and James Buchanan. 1980. The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, Robin and Shah, Anwar. 2009. Fiscal federalism. Principles and practice of multiorder governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., and Richard E. Wagner. 1977. Democracy in deficit: Political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carboni, G. Giuseppina. 2014. Fiscal federalism and comparative law. Comparative Law Review 5: 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • CGC. 2019. Commonwealth-states relations, 2018–2019, Fiscal Equalisation | Commonwealth Grants Commission (cgc.gov.au). Accessed 16 Sept 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courchene, Thomas J. 2008. Reflections on the federal spending power: Practices, principles, perspectives. Queen’s Law Journal 34 (1): 75–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, Kenneth W. 1977. The American fiscal constitution. University of Chicago Law Review 44: 271–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Visser, Jaap, and Zemelak Ayele. 2014. Intergovernmental fiscal relations in South Africa and the role of the financial and fiscal commission. A 20 Year review, community law centre, Microsoft Word – 03082014 – FFC 20 Year Review (uwc.ac.za). Accessed 29 Sept 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Carl J. 1962. Federal Constitutional Theory and emergent proposals. In Federalism: Mature and emergent, ed. A.W. Macmahon, 58ff. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, Brian. 2012. Fiscal federalism: Then and now. In Future of Australian federalism: Comparative and interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. G. Appleby, N. Aroney, and T. John, 320–338. Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García Ruiz, J. Luis, and Emilia Girón Reguera. 2005. La financiación autonómica: ¿competencia constitucional o estatutaria? Revista española de derecho constitucional 75: 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellermann, J. 2010. Artikel 104a. In Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, ed. H. von Mangoldt et al., 1099–1186. München: Franz Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein, Walter. 2011. The original model: The United States. In Tax aspects of fiscal federalism. A comparative analysis, ed. Gianluigi Bizioli and Claudio Sacchetto, 23–76. Amsterdam: IBFD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneke, H.-G. 2011. Art. 105. In Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, ed. B. Schmidt-Bleibtreu, F. Klein, and H. Hofmann. Köln: Carl Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, C. Randall, and Martin Kessler. 2012. Fiscal federalism: US history for architects of Europe’s fiscal union. Bruegel: Bruegel Essay and Lecture Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, J. Edwin. 2004. Fiscal decentralization: Theory as reform. In Financial management theory in the public sector, ed. A. Khan and W.B. Hildreth, 165–186. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, John. 2012. The rise of social welfare and onward march of coercive federalism. In Networked governance: The future of intergovernmental management, ed. Jack W. Meek and Kurt Thurmaier, 8–32. CQ Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The rise and characteristics of coercive federalism in the United States. In Principles and practices of fiscal autonomy. Experiences, debates and prospects, ed. Giancarlo Pola, 57–72. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, David. 2007. Allocation of taxing powers. OECD Journal on Budgeting 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumm, Thomas. 2015. Föderale Staaten im Vergleich. Eine Einführung, 186 ff. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, Richard A. 1959. The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. Who should tax, where and what? In Tax assignment in Federal Countries, ed. Charles E. Mclure, 2–19. Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Public finance and democratic society, III: The foundations of taxation and expenditure. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Wallace E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3): 1120–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance 12: 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, Francesco. 2012. Comparare il federalismo fiscale: cosa, come, perché. In Federalismo fiscale in Europa: Esperienze straniere e spunti per il caso italiano, ed. Francesco Palermo and Matteo Nicolini, 1–11. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, Francesco, and Karl Kössler. 2017. Comparative federalism: Constitutional arrangements and case law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, Francesco. 2020. La traiettoria comparata del federalismo fiscale: alcune evidenze dai casi italiano e spagnolo. In Costituzioni finanziarie e riforme: Italia e Spagna a confronto. eds. Francesco Palermo, Sara Parolari, Alice Valdesalici. 255–263. Napoli: ESI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, Francesco, and Jens Woelk. 1999. Il Bundesrat tra continuità e ipotesi di riforma. Le Regioni 6: 1097–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parolari, Sara. 2018. From a formal to a substantial approach: Sources of law and fiscal federalism. In Comparing fiscal federalism, ed. Alice Valdesalici and Francesco Palermo, 22–39. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernthaler, Peter. 1984. Österreichische Finanzverfassung: Theorie – Praxis – Reform. Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pola, Giancarlo. 2015. Principles and Practices of Fiscal Autonomy: Experiences, Debates and Prospects. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Yingyi, and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramallo Massanet, Joan, and Juan Zornoza Perez. 2000. El Consejo de Política Fiscal y Financiera y las Comisiones Mixtas en la financiación de las Comunidades Autónomas. Papeles de economía española 83: 60–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos Prieto, J. 2012. El sistema tributario en el estado autonómico. In Análisis a la luz del estatuto de autonomía para Andalucía de 2007 y de la reforma de la financiación autonómica de 2009. Sevilla: Fundación Pública Andaluza, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentzsch, Daniel P. 2011. The Swiss confederation. In Tax aspects of fiscal federalism. A comparative analysis, ed. Gianluigi Bizioli and Claudio Sacchetto, 221–270. Amsterdam: IBFD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan A., et al. 2003. Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Cheryl. 2018. Financial autonomy vs. solidarity: A dialogue between two complimentary opposites. In Comparing fiscal federalism, ed. Alice Valdesalici and Francesco Palermo, 40–59. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. A new federalism? The role and future of the National Cabinet. Governing during crisis policy brief 2. Melbourne School of Government. https://government.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/3443258/GDC-Policy-Brief-2_National-Cabinet_final01.07.2020.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2021.

  • Shah, Anwar. 2007a. Comparative conclusions on fiscal federalism. In The practice of fiscal federalism: Comparative perspectives, ed. Anwar Shah and John Kincaid, 370–393. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. Introduction: Principles of fiscal federalism. In The practice of fiscal federalism: Comparative perspectives, ed. Anwar Shah and John Kincaid, 3–42. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Chanchal Kumar, and Alice Valdesalici. 2020. Fiscal Federalism. In Max planck encyclopaedia of comparative constitutional law, ed. R. Grote, F. Lachenmann, and R. Wolfrum. Oxford University Press. https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e287?rskey=huIHUT&result=1&prd=MPECCOL. Accessed 14 Sept 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N.K. 2020. Fiscal federalism in India. In Local public finance and capacity building in Asia. Issues and challenges, OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies, ed. Junghun Kim and Sean Dougherty. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorens, Jason. 2011. The Institutions of Fiscal Federalism. Publius 41 (2): 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Garth. 2006. Fiscal federalism and the burden of history. Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations – Queen’s University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Miranda. 2011. Australia. In Tax aspects of fiscal federalism. A comparative analysis, ed. Gianluigi Bizioli and Claudio Sacchetto, 23–76. Amsterdam: IBFD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steytler, Nico. 2009. Comparative conclusions. In Local government and metropolitan regions in Federal Systems, ed. Nico Steytler, 427–428. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, Vito. 2008. The future of fiscal federalism. European Journal of Political Economy 24 (3): 705–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdesalici, Alice. 2019. The peregrinations of fiscal federalism: past, present and future of a research agenda. In A research Agenda for Federalism Studies, ed. John Kincaid. 93–105. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdesalici, Alice and Palermo, Francesco. 2018. Comparing fiscal federalism. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Ronald L. 1989. Executive federalism: A comparative analysis. Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Federalism, federal political systems, and federations. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Federal financial relations: A comparative perspective. In Canada: The state of the federation 1999/2000, ed. Harvey Lazar, 371–380. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Processes for adjusting Federal Financial relations: Examples from Australia and Canada. In Fiscal relations in Federal Countries: Four essays, ed. P. Boothe, 17–39. Ottawa: Forum of Federations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Ronald. 2005. Autonomy or Dependence: Intergovernmental Financial Relations in Eleven Countries, Working papers Institute of Intergovernmental Relations. https://www.queensu.ca/iigr/sites/webpublish.queensu.ca.iigrwww/files/files/WorkingPapers/Archive/2005/2005-5RonaldWatts.pdf. Accessed 28.05.2022.

  • ———. 2018. Comparative research and fiscal federalism. In Comparing fiscal federalism, ed. Alice Valdesalici and Francesco Palermo, 376–381. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R. 2007. Second generation fiscal federalism: Implications for decentralized democratic governance and economic development. Working paper of the Hoover Institution on War, revolution, and peace. Stanford University. D:\E\PAPERS\Federalism\SGFF.06\ARD-USAID\ARD.MS.06\SGFF.MS.2.35..07.0924.p.wpd (stanford.edu). Accessed 15 Sept 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics 65 (3): 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Second generation on fiscal federalism: Political aspects of decentralization and economic development. World Development 53: 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Rudolf. 2008. Finanzhoheit und Finanzausgleich. In Handbuch des Staatsrechts, ed. Josep Isensee and Paul Kirchhof, vol. VI, 875–964. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, David E. 2008. Fiscal Federalism. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, ed. S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Essential Reading

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, and Giorgio Brosio. 2006. Handbook of fiscal federalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, George. 2010. Fiscal federalism: A comparative introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, Robin. 2009. Fiscal federalism. Principles and practice of multiorder governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, Robin, and Anwar Shah. 2007. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: Principles and practices. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Chanchal Kumar and Valdesalici, Alice. 2020. Fiscal Federalism. In Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, eds. Grote, R, Lachenmann, F, and Wolfrum, R. Oxford University Press. https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e287?rskey=huIHUT&result=1&prd=MPECCOL. Accessed 31 Jan 2022.

  • Watts, Ronald L. 2018. Comparative research and fiscal federalism. In Comparing fiscal federalism, eds. Valdesalici, Alice and Francesco Palermo, 376–381. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Valdesalici .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Valdesalici, A. (2022). Fiscal Federalism. In: Cremades, J., Hermida, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_206-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_206-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31739-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics