Abstract
Digital literacies are an important area of contemporary research and practice. However, policy and research on this topic relies almost exclusively on capability or competence models of “digital literacy”. These decontextualised, cognitive accounts ignore the insights of New Literacy Studies (e.g. Lea and Street. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172, 1998), which have shown that focusing on a ‘free floating’ learner, without reference to settings, resources and cultures, fails to explain important aspects of how literacy practices are achieved and enacted. Adopting a sociomaterial account of learning provides an alternative to these narratives about student literacy. From this perspective, ‘literacy’ is an achievement that involves the successful coordination of human and non-human actors—including teachers, other learners, pupils, devices, texts and so on. Drawing on work undertaken as part of a JISC-funded project, we critique mainstream ‘learner-centred’ accounts of digital literacy; outline the theoretical framework on which our work has been based; and present a series of case studies that show how an individual’s ability to act in a digitally literate way depends on much more than an assumed set of stable, internalised qualities. These cases involve data collected by students through multimodal journalling over a period of 9–12 months, and from in-depth interviews that explored what these meant to them. This analysis shows how learners’ practices are shaped by the social and material environments in which they are enacted, and reveals that learners are engaged in an ongoing, improvisatory process of both adapting to the environments in which they work, whilst also adapting these environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkins, M. (1999). Oven‐ready and self‐basting: Taking stock of employability skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(2), 267–280.
Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 17–32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Beetham, H. (2010). Review and Scoping Study for a Cross-JISC Learning and Digital Literacies Programme. JISC. Retrieved from www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/funding/2011/04/Briefingpaper.pdf.
Belshaw, D. (2011). What is ‘digital literacy’? A pragmatic investigation. Doctoral Thesis, Durham University. Retrieved from http://neverendingthesis.com/doug-belshaw-edd-thesis-final.pdf.
Bennett, L. (2014). Learning from the early adopters: Developing the digital practitioner. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 1–13.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson’s handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Buckingham, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 73–89). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Carrington, V., & Robinson, M. (2009). Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices. London: Sage.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge.
Friesen, N. (2010). Ethics and the technologies of empire: E-learning and the US military. AI and society, 25(1), 71–81.
Gillen, J., & Barton, D. (2010). Digital literacies: A research briefing by the technology enhanced learning phase of the teaching and learning research programme. London: London Knowledge Lab. http://www.tlrp.org/docs/DigitalLiteracies.pdf.
Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. (2013). Literacy in the digital university: Critical perspectives on learning, scholarship and technology. London: Routledge.
Gourlay, L. (2012). Cyborg ontologies and the lecturer’s voice: A posthuman reading of the ‘face-to-face’. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(2), 198–211.
Gourlay, L., Hamilton, M., & Lea, M. (2013). Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: Messing with digital literacies. Research in Learning Technology, 23, 1–13.
Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge.
Kittler, F. (2004). Universities: Wet, hard, soft and harder. Critical Inquiry, 31(1), 244–255.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.
Leander, K., & Lovorn, J. (2006). Literacy networks: Following the circulation of texts, bodies and objects in the schooling and online gaming of one youth. Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), 291–340.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267.
Mayes, T. (2006). LEX – Methodology report. Glasgow Caledonian University and Open Learning. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/lex_method_final.pdf.
Sharpe, R., & Beetham, H. (2010). Understanding students’ uses of technology for learning. In R. Sharpe, H. Beetham, & S. De Freitas (Eds.), Rethinking learning for a digital age: How learners are shaping their own experiences (pp. 85–99). London: Routledge.
Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., Benfield, G., DeCicco, E., & Lessner, E. (2009). Learners experiences of e-learning synthesis report: Explaining learner differences. Unpublished project report, Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved from https://wiki.brookes.ac.uk/display/JISCle2f/Findings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gourlay, L., Oliver, M. (2016). It’s Not All About the Learner: Reframing Students’ Digital Literacy as Sociomaterial Practice. In: Ryberg, T., Sinclair, C., Bayne, S., de Laat, M. (eds) Research, Boundaries, and Policy in Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31130-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31130-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31128-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31130-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)