Skip to main content

Using Social Network Analysis to Design Crime Prevention Strategies: A Case Study of Methamphetamine Manufacture and Trafficking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crime Prevention in the 21st Century

Abstract

Most previous research using social network analysis (SNA) to study criminal networks has focused on describing network structure and on identifying key actors in networks. Results of such research usually have implications for law enforcement interventions designed to dismantle and disrupt criminal networks after they are formed. Relatively little attention has been paid to the potential for SNA to aid in the development of crime prevention strategies against organized crimes such as drug trafficking. In this chapter, a case study of a methamphetamine manufacture and trafficking group is presented. The network is analyzed using social network analysis and crime script analysis with the aim of generating a series of crime prevention strategies. Crime prevention strategies are suggested across two broad levels: (1) the crime commission process including the activities and resources required to commit the particular crime; and (2) the criminal network that supports and carries out the activities in the crime commission process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data was used in a previous study on the evolution of criminal networks; see Bright & Delaney, 2013).

  2. 2.

    The “unknown” status may be a result of his high brokerage and low degree. Law enforcement may not have identified this actor as important either because he was not well connected and/or because he appeared to play only a minor role.

References

  • Ayling, J. (2011). Pre-emptive strike: How Australia is tackling outlaw motorcycle gangs. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(3), 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayling, J., & Broadhurst, R. (2012). The suppression of organised crime: New approaches and problems (Best practice in policing and security, pp. 37–55). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1993). The Social Organization of Conspiracy: Illegal Networks in the Heavy Electrical Equipment Industry. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 837–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, U., & Wagner, D. (2004). Visone—Analysis and visualisation of social networks. In M. Junger & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software (pp. 321–340). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. A., & Delaney, J. J. (2013). Evolution of a drug trafficking network: Mapping changes in network structure and function across time. Global Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. A., Greenhill, C., & Levenkova, N. (2014). Dismantling criminal networks: Can node attributes play a role. In C. Morselli (Ed.), Crime and networks. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. A., Hughes, C. E., & Chalmers, J. (2012). Illuminating dark networks: A social network analysis of an Australian drug trafficking syndicate. Crime, Law, and Social Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., Jannotta, J. E., & Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20(1), 63–87. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00005-1. http://dx.doi.org.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderoni, F. (2012). The structure of drug trafficking mafias: The ‘Ndrangheta and cocaine. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(3), 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderoni, F. (2014). Identifying Mafia Bosses from Meeting Attendance Networks and Network Analysis for Defence and Security (pp. 27–48): Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. M., Dombroski, D., Tsvetovat, M., Reminga, J., & Kamneva, N. (2003). Destabilizing dynamic covert networks. Paper presented at the 8th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium., National Defence War College, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Y., Leclerc, B., & Townsley, M. (2011). Crime script analysis of drug manufacturing in clandestine laboratories. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B. (1994). The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (pp. 151–196). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2002). Analyzing organised crimes. In A. R. Piquero & S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges (pp. 41–62). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In M. J. Smith & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention (Crime Prevention Studies no. 16, pp. 41–96). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism the high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 91(3 suppl), 48S–65S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2003). Organised crime and the conjunction of criminal opportunity framework. In A. Edwards & P. Gill (Eds.), Transnational organised crime (pp. 28–41). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everton, S. F. (2012). Disrupting dark networks. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (2006). The Ecosystem for Organized Crime. HEUNI Paper No 26. HEUNI. Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (2009). Codes of the underworld: How criminals communicate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, W., Ritter, A., Bright, D., & Doran, C. (2012). How profitable is methamphetamine dealing in Australia? Drug and alcohol dependence, 122(3), 208–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G., & Laycock, G. (2010). Organised crime and crime scripts: Prospects for disruption. In K. Bullock, R. V. Clarke, & N. Tilley (Eds.), Situational Prevention of Organised Crime (pp. 172–192). Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huther, J., & Shah, A. (2000). Anti-corruption policies and programs: A framework for evaluation (Vol. 2501): World Bank Publications, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, V. E. (2002). Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections, 24(3), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M., & Maguire, M. (2004). Reducing and preventing organised crime: An evidence-based critique. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41, 397–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso, M. (2013). Not all madams have a central role: Analysis of a Nigerian sex trafficking network. Trends in Organized Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matei, L., & Matei, A. (2009). Corruption in the public organizations. Towards a model of cost-benefit analysis for the anticorruption strategies. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 27, 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Soole, D. W., & Rombouts, S. (2006). Street-level drug law enforcement: A meta-analytical review⋆. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(4), 409–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKetin, R., Sutherland, R., Bright, D. A., & Norberg, M. M. (2011). A systematic review of methamphetamine precursor regulations. Addiction, 106(11), 1911–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C. (2005). Contacts, opportunities, and criminal enterprise. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C. (2009a). Hells Angels in springtime. Trends in Organized Crime, 12, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C. (2009b). Inside criminal networks. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C. (2010). Assessing vulnerable and strategic positions in a criminal network. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C., & Roy, J. (2008). Brokerage qualifications in ringing operations. Criminology, 46(1), 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan, M. (2000). Understanding the structure of a drug trafficking organisation: A conversational analysis. In M. Natarajan & M. Hough (Eds.), Illegal Drug Markets: From Research to Prevention Policy. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos, A. V., & Smith, C. M. (2013). The embedded and multiplex nature of Al Capone. In C. Morselli (Ed.), Crime and networks. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransley, J., Mazerolle, L., Manning, M., McGuffog, I., Drew, J. M., & Webster, J. (2012). Reducing the methamphetamine problem in Australia: Evaluating innovative partnerships between police, pharmacies and other third parties. Canberra, Australia: NDLERF Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, A., Bright, D. A., & Gong, W. (2012). Evaluating drug law enforcement interventions directed towards methamphetamine in Australia. Canberra: National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. M., & Rouselle, D. A. (2009). Using social network analysis to target criminal networks. Trends in Organised Crime, 12, 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, R. L., Carlson, R. G., Leukefeld, C. G., & Booth, B. M. (2006). Patterns of illicit methamphetamine production (“cooking”) and associated risks in the rural south: An ethnographic exploration. Journal of Drug Issues, 36(4), 853–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, A., Cherney, A., & White, R. (2013). Crime prevention: Principles, perspectives and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2001). Transnational Criminal Networks. In D. F. R. John Arquilla (Ed.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Chen, H. (2009). Untangling criminal networks: A Case Study Intelligence and Security Informatics (pp. 958–958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Bright .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bright, D.A. (2017). Using Social Network Analysis to Design Crime Prevention Strategies: A Case Study of Methamphetamine Manufacture and Trafficking. In: LeClerc, B., Savona, E. (eds) Crime Prevention in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27793-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27793-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27791-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27793-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics