Abstract
The human mind is endowed with innate primordial perceptions such as space, distance, motion, change, flow of time, matter. The field of cognitive science argues that the abstract concepts of mathematics are not Platonic, but are built in the brain from these primordial perceptions, using what are known as conceptual metaphors. Known cognitive mechanisms give rise to the extremely precise and logical language of mathematics. Thus all of the vastness of mathematics, with its beautiful theorems, is human mathematics. It resides in the mind, and is not ‘out there’. Physics is an experimental science in which results of experiments are described in terms of concrete concepts—these concepts are also built from our primordial perceptions. The goal of theoretical physics is to describe the experimentally observed regularity of the physical world in an unambiguous, precise and logical manner. To do so, the brain resorts to the well-defined abstract concepts which the mind has metaphored from our primordial perceptions. Since both the concrete and the abstract are derived from the primordial, the connection between physics and mathematics is not mysterious, but natural. This connection is established in the human brain, where a small subset of the vast human mathematics is cognitively fitted to describe the regularity of the universe. Theoretical physics should be thought of as a branch of mathematics, whose axioms are motivated by observations of the physical world. We use the example of quantum theory to demonstrate the all too human nature of the physics-mathematics connection: it is at times frail, and imperfect. Our resistance to take this imperfection sufficiently seriously (since no known experiment violates quantum theory) shows the fundamental importance of experiments in physics. This is unlike in mathematics, the goal there being to search for logical and elegant relations amongst abstract concepts which the mind creates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
R. Courant and H. Robbins, What is Mathematics? (Oxford University Press, 1996).
A. Koestler, The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man’s Changing Vision of the Universe (Penguin Books, 1990).
C. W. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, 1973).
D. Ruelle, The Mathematician’s Brain (Princeton University Press, 2007).
K. Appel and H. Wolfgang, Illinois Journal of Mathematics 21, 429 (1977).
G. Faltings, Inventiones Mathematicae 73, 349 (1983).
V. Jones, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 12, 103 (1985).
E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989).
S. Dehaene, The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics (Oxford University Press, 2011).
S. E. Antell and D. P. Keating, Child Development 54, 695 (1983).
K. Wynn, Nature 358, 749 (1992).
R. Bijeljac-Babic, J. Bertoncini, and J. Mehler, Developmental Psychology 29, 711 (1991).
F. Mechner and L. Gueverekian, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 5, 463 (1962).
R. M. Church and W. H. Meck, Animal Cognition, edited by T. G. Bever and H. S. Terrace (Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum, 1984).
M. D. Hauser, P. MacNeilage, and M. Ware, Proc. Nat. Aca. Sci. USA 93, 1514 (1996).
G. Lakoff and R. E. Nunez, Where Mathematics Comes From? (Basic Books, 2000).
S. Narayanan, Embodiment in language understanding: sensory motor representations for metaphoric reasoning about event descriptions, Ph.D. thesis, UC Berkeley (1997).
C. Johnson, Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of SEE, edited by M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, and S. Wilcox (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1997).
T. P. Singh, “Youtube video: Does nature play dice?” (2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSiDsMKS_uU).
J. S. Bell, Physics World, 8, 33 (1990).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon Press, 1965).
A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, and H. Ulbricht, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 471 (2013).
S. Bera, B. Motwani, T. P. Singh, and H. Ulbricht, Scientific Reports 5, 7664 (2015).
T. P. Singh, Bulg. J. Phys. 33, 217 (2006).
A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry (Academic Press Inc, 1995).
K. Lochan and T. P. Singh, Phys. Lett. A 375, 3747 (2011).
S. L. Adler, Quantum theory as an emergent phenomenon (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004) pp. xii+225.
K. Lochan, S. Satin, and T. P. Singh, Found. Phys. 42, 1556 (2012).
T. P. Singh, in The Forgotten Present, edited by T. Filk and A. von Muller (arXiv:1210.8110) (Springer: Berlin-Heidelberg, 2013).
A. Connes, arXiv:math/0011193 (2000).
A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, Fortsch. Phys. 58, 553 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mujumdar, A.G., Singh, T. (2016). Cognitive Science and the Connection Between Physics and Mathematics. In: Aguirre, A., Foster, B., Merali, Z. (eds) Trick or Truth?. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27495-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27495-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27494-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27495-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)