Skip to main content

Design Thinking as Mindset, Process, and Toolbox

Experiences from Research and Teaching at the University of St.Gallen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Thinking for Innovation

Abstract

Design Thinking is a development that has recently attracted significant attention in the management discourse. The Institute of Information Management at the University of St.Gallen, the academic home of all three authors, has been conducting Design Thinking teaching and research for 10 years. In this study, Design Thinking is defined as: mindset, process, and toolbox. As a mindset, Design Thinking is characterized by several key principles: a combination of divergent and convergent thinking, a strong orientation to both obvious and hidden needs of customers and users, and prototyping. As a process, Design Thinking is seen as a combination of a micro- and a macro-process. The micro-process—as innovation process per se—consists of these steps: “Define the Problem”, “Needfinding and Synthesis”, “Ideate”, “Prototype” and “Test”. The macro-process consists of milestones manifested in prototypes that must fulfill defined requirements. As a toolbox, Design Thinking refers to the application of numerous methods and techniques from various disciplines: design, but also engineering, informatics, and psychology. Today, a growing number of companies, consulting firms, and universities use Design Thinking, continuously enlarging and re-defining its meaning. At University of St.Gallen, Design Thinking is taught as a problem-based course, together with research partner companies, with more than 40 projects successfully completed over the past 10 years. Research in Design Thinking at the University of St.Gallen focuses on aspects of modeling the Design Thinking processes and corporate entrepreneurship. In the near future, Design Thinking is expected to be deployed as an innovative method in corporations and also become an integral part of management education, particularly innovation. In addition, it will be developed further at the interface of design, design management and engineering sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.audiunite.com/se/service/sv_unite.html, retrieved on 18 December 2014.

  2. 2.

    https://profiles.stanford.edu/larry-leifer, retrieved on 22 January 2015.

  3. 3.

    http://www.colani.de/, retrieved on 19 December 2014.

  4. 4.

    http://www.bauhaus.de/de/, retrieved on 19 December 2014.

  5. 5.

    http://web.stanford.edu/group/me310/me310_2014/, retrieved on 19 December 2014.

  6. 6.

    http://dthsg.com/ retrieved on 19 December 2014.

  7. 7.

    http://dschool.stanford.edu/, retrieved on 19 December 2014.

  8. 8.

    http://web.stanford.edu/group/me310/me310_2014/about_design_process_big.html, retrieved on 19 December 2014. These websites provide an idea of Design Thinking education at Standford University’s Engineering Department.

  9. 9.

    http://dthsg.com/phases/, retrieved on 19 December 2014.

  10. 10.

    We would like to point out that the list of methods and tools is neither complete nor representative. We selected for this introduction a few tools to give a first glimpse into the tools that are used during Design Thinking projects.

  11. 11.

    https://dschool.stanford.edu/wp-content/themes/dschool/method-cards/empathy-map.pdf, retrieved on 22 January 2015.

  12. 12.

    http://www.drawingideasbook.com/images/AEIOU_worksheets.pdf, retrieved on 22 January 2015.

  13. 13.

    http://www.strengthsfinder.com/, retrieved on 26 January 2015.

  14. 14.

    http://web.stanford.edu/group/me310/me310_2014/, retrieved on 22 January 2015.

References

  • Abrell T, Durstewitz M (2014) User involvement in internal corporate venturing: the viewpoint of the corporate entrepreneur. In: CINet conference 2014, Budapest, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrell T, Uebernickel F (2014) Design thinking and corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. In: Bohemia E, Rieple A, Liedtka J, Cooper R (eds) Proceedings of the 19th DMI: academic design management conference, London, pp 1887–1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrell T, Durstewitz M, Uebernickel F (2014) Design thinking and effectuation in internal corporate venturing: an exploratory study. In: Toivonen M (ed) Proceedings 24th annual RESER conference services and new societal challenges: innovation for sustainable growth and welfare, Helsinki, 11–13 September, pp 7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzert H (1982) Die Entwicklung von Software-Systemen: Prinzipien, Methoden, Sprachen, Werkzeuge. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner W, Witte C (2011) Business innovation: CIOs im Wettbewerb der Ideen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner W, Karagiannis D, Kolbe L, Krüger J, Lamberti HJ, Leifer L, Leimeister JM, Österle H, Petrie C, Plattner H, Schwabe G, Uebernickel F, Winter R, Zarnekow R (2014) User, use and utility research. Wirtschaftsinformatik 56(1):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs-Myers I, Myers P (1995) Gifts differing: understanding personality type. Davies-Black Publishing, Mountain View, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2008) Design Thinking. Harv Bus Rev June 2008:84–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A (2004) Inmates are running the asylum: why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Sams Publishing, Indianapolis, IN, Retrieved on 15 Jan 2015 from: http://itu.dk/people/russel/B%F8ger/Pearson.-.The.Inmates.Are.Running.the.Asylum.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K (2010) The nature of design thinking. In: Proceedings of the 8th design thinking research symposium, pp 19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Faste R, Roth B, Wilde DJ (1993) Integrating creativity into the mechanical engineering curriculum. ASME Resource Guide to Innovation in Eng. Design

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand S, Jonas J (2012) Mapping design research. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassi L, Laakso M (2011) Conceptions of design thinking in the design and management discourses. In: Roozenburg NFM, Chen LL, Stappers PJ (eds) Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th world conference on design research, Delft, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Sköldberg U, Woodilla J, Çetinkaya M (2013) Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creat Innov Manag 22(2):121–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley T, Kelley D (2013) Creative confidence—unleashing the creative potential within us all. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V (2012) 101 design methods: a structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko DF, Morris MH, Covin JG (2011) Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation: entrepreneurial development within organizations, 3rd edn. South-Western Cengage Learning, Independence, KY, International edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister JM, Winter R, Brenner W, Jung R (2014) Research Program “Digital business and transformation IWI-HSG” (Working Paper No. 1). Working paper series University of St.Gallen Institute of Information Management (IWI-HSG)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidwell W, Holden K, Butler J (2004) Design: Die 100 Prinzipien für erfolgreiche Gestaltung. Stiebner Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (2009) The design of business: why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin B, Hanington B (2013) Design Methoden: 100 Recherchemethoden und Analysetechniken für erfolgreiche Gestaltung. Stieber Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinel C, Leifer L (2015) Introduction—design thinking is mainly about building innovators. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research: building innovators. Springer, Cham, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle H (1981) Entwurf betrieblicher Informationssysteme. Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno T (1993) Das Toyota-Produktionssystem. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionaries (2015). Retrieved on 3 Jan 2015 from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/design

  • Plattner H, Meinel C, Weinberg U (2009) Design Thinking—Innovation lernen—Ideenwelten öffnen. Moderne Industrie, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesenbery W, Brooks K (2011) Storytelling for user experience: crafting stories for better design. Rosenfeld Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport A (1986) Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhinow H, Meinel C (2014) Design thinking: expectations from a management perspective. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research: building innovation eco-systems. Springer, Cham, pp 239–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe PG (1987) Design thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindlholzer B (2014) Methode zur Entwicklung von Innovationen durch Design Thinking Coaching. Disseration, D-Druck Spescha, St.Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamiyeh M (2010) Ways of bringing it about. In: Shamiyeh M (ed) Creating desired futures—how design thinking innovates business. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 113–126

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford University (2011) ME 310—Stanford design cycle. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford University (2016) ME 310–Stanford design cycle. http://web.stanford.edu/group/me310/me316 2016/aboutdesignprocessbig.html. Accessed 01 Jan 2016

  • Stickdorn M, Schneider J (2011) This is service design thinking. Basics—Tools—Cases. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Thommen JP (2012) Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Versus Verlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetterli C, Uebernickel F, Brenner W (2012) Initialzündung durch Embedded Design Thinking—Ein Fallbeispiel aus der Finanzindustrie. Zeitschrift für Organisationsentwicklung 2:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde D (2009) Teamology: the construction and organization of effective teams. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Brenner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., Abrell, T. (2016). Design Thinking as Mindset, Process, and Toolbox. In: Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F. (eds) Design Thinking for Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics