Abstract
Crimmigration policies, in Spain and elsewhere, have shown a complex interplay between neoliberal and sovereign rationales of control throughout the first decade of the twenty-first century.
However, the analysis of this domain of penal control should be revised in the context of the Great Recession. Indeed, in the Spanish case, crimmigration policies have incorporated a set of innovations in recent years. Some of them, such as the readjustment of the deportation system, can be understood from a neoliberal perspective. Others, such as changes in policing, have a more hybrid profile, in which neoliberal features encounter sovereign and neoconservative trends. Therefore, the context of the Great Recession requires a new analysis of the hybridization between neoliberal and sovereign devices of control in the area of crimmigration policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
New public management (NPM) is an expression which denotes the government policies that since the 1980s have aimed to modernize and allegedly render more efficient the public sector. The basic hypothesis holds that market-oriented management of the public sector will lead to greater cost-efficiency for governments. On the concept of NPM, see Osborne and Gaebler (1992) and Clarke and Newman (1997).
- 2.
On the concept of “expressive justice,” see Tonry (2004), pp. 159 ff.
- 3.
The level of coherence or contradiction between this neoconservative penality and the neoliberal penal policies of risk management and economic utilitarianism must be further researched. While the majority of the academic literature tends to highlight their inherent contradictions (Easton and Piper 2008; Garland 2001; Sullivan 2001), some authors (Kemshall and Wood 2008; Rose 2000; Sparks 2000b) emphasize their consonance.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
In academic literature, it is highly contested whether high prison population rates are consonant with neoliberal penal trends or if they are, first and foremost, a key feature of a neoconservative penology of harsh punishment. On the former point of view, see O’Malley (2006) and Rose (2000); on the latter perspective, see Garland (2001) and Sullivan (2001). In my opinion, it appears fairly difficult to frame a model of high and rising prison population rates within a pattern of neoliberal penal policies grounded on a principle of economic efficiency, due to the considerable amount of public expenditure that such imprisonment requires.
- 7.
Carrasco Carpio (2008, pp. 229 ff.) estimates that the amount of irregular migrants in Spain by the middle of the decade was over one million people.
- 8.
The figures of the foreign-born resident population are slightly higher than the numbers of foreign resident population due to nationalization practices. According to INE official data, in 2000 the foreign-born population resident in Spain amounted to 3.6 % of the total population; in 2010, it had risen to 14.0 %, and it slightly dropped to 13.4 % in 2014.
- 9.
Circular No. 1/2010 was abrogated by the subsequent right-wing Spanish Government in May 2012, through the Circular No. 2/2012, which changed the official interpretation of police powers to stop, search, and arrest migrants. Nonetheless, the practice of police raids against migrants remained untouched and seems to have sidelined the new normative framework (see Bradford et al. 2013; Fernández Rodríguez de Liévana et al. 2013, p. 58).
- 10.
See ElDiario.es, 03/30/2013.
- 11.
- 12.
See El Periódico, 05/01/2012.
- 13.
The aforementioned evolution of the deportation policy and the concern for public expenditure may be also appreciated in the coetaneous evolution of the prison realm. In effect, the Spanish prison population has dropped by 15.0 % between May 2010 and February 2015, according to Spanish Home Office official data. The most striking feature of this recent evolution is its contradiction with the criminal justice system data, since the number of arrested individuals, the number of convicted individuals, and the number of individuals sentenced to prison have risen during the mentioned period.
- 14.
Nonetheless, the poor official data available in this field leads to certain ambiguities, which require further analysis. In effect, the data provided by the Spanish Home Office are not consistent at all with the ones published by the Fiscalía General del Estado (2014) [Office of the Spanish Attorney General], which accounts for a number of penal deportations far lower than that stated by the Home Office. It may well be the case that a significant amount of the expulsions counted by the Home Office as “qualified” (or criminal) deportations are not formally “criminal” (i.e., enforced by a penal court following a conviction by a criminal offense), but they are the consequence of a criminal conviction or record, even though the sanction is formally an administrative removal. This might allow us to infer that the current Spanish deportation policy seeks efficiency in the use of scarce resources, and also utility of this policy in terms of political currency, by presenting the deported foreigners primarily as dangerous aliens.
- 15.
- 16.
It should be pointed out that, mirroring the dualism of neoliberal and sovereign control policies, the scholarly literature shows a distinct cleavage in how it analyzes Foucault’s concept of biopolitics. On the one hand, some authors (e.g., Agamben 1998 or Esposito 2008) interpret the concept as a derivative of the Reason of State, tying biopolitics to the notion of sovereign exceptionalism. In contrast, another body of literature (e.g., Hardt and Negri 2000 or Rose 1999) understands biopolitics as a paradigm pertaining to the domain of liberal governmentality. On this debate, see Campesi 2011, pp. 179 ff.; Lemke 2011, pp. 34 ff/51 ff.
References
Aebi MF, Delgrande N (2015) Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics. Space I – Prison Populations. Survey 2013. Council of Europe, Strasbourg
Agamben G (1998) Homo Sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press, Redwood City
Amnistía Internacional (2011) Parad el racismo, no a las personas. Perfiles raciales y control de la inmigración en España
Bigo D (2011) Security: a field left fallow. In: Dillon M, Neal AW (eds) Foucault on politics, security and war. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 93–114
Bosworth M, Guild M (2008) Governing through migration control: security and citizenship in Britain. Br J Criminol 48:703–719
Bottoms A (1995) The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In: Clarkson C, Morgan R (eds) The politics of sentencing reform. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 17–49
Bradford B et al (2013) Identificación policial por perfil étnico en España: Informe sobre experiencias y actitudes en relación con las actuaciones policiales. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia
Brandariz García JA (2011) Sistema penal y control de los migrantes. Gramática del migrante como infractor penal. Granada, Comares
Calavita K (2003) A ‘reserve army of delinquents’. The criminalization and economic punishment of immigrants in Spain. Punishment Soc 5:399–413
Calavita K (2005) Immigrants at the margins. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Campesi G (2011) Soggetto, disciplina, governo. Mimesis, Sesto San Giovanni
Carrasco Carpio C (2008) Mercado de trabajo e inmigración. In: Izquierdo Escribano A (ed) El modelo de inmigración y los riesgos de exclusión. Foessa, Madrid, pp 213–257
Clarke JH, Newman JE (1997) The managerial state: power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Sage, London
De Giorgi A (2002) Il governo dell’eccedenza. Postfordismo e controllo della moltitudine. Ombre corte, Verona
De Giorgi A (2006) Re-thinking the political economy of punishment. Perspectives on post-fordism and penal politics. Ashgate, Aldershot
Dean M (2007) Governing societies. Open University Press, Maidenhead
Dean M (2010) Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Dilts A (2008) Michel Foucault meets Gary Becker: criminality beyond discipline and punish. Carceral Notebooks 4:77–100
Easton S, Piper C (2008) Sentencing and punishment. The quest for justice, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Esposito R (2008) Bios: biopolitics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Fernández Bessa C (2013) Il panorama dei Centri di Internamento per Stranieri in Spagna: dal controllo delle frontieri alla gestione della criminalità. Antigone 8(1):68–91
Fernández Rodríguez de Liévana G et al (2013) Qué hacemos con las fronteras. Akal, Madrid
Fiscalía General del Estado (2014) Memoria 2014. Ministerio de Justicia, Madrid
Foucault M (2007) Security, territory, population. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke
Foucault M (2008) The birth of biopolitics. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke
Garland D (1997) ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theor Criminol 1:173–214
Garland D (2001) The culture of control. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Garland D (2003) The rise of risk. In: Ericson RV, Doyle A (eds) Risk and morality. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 48–86
Harcourt BE (2007) Against prediction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hardt M, Negri A (2000) Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Huysmans J (2006) The politics of insecurity. Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Routledge, Abingdon
Iglesias Skulj A (2011) El cambio en el estatuto de la Ley penal y en los mecanismos de control: flujos migratorios y gubernamentalidad neoliberal. Comares, Granada
Jiménez Franco D (2014) La burbuja penal. Mercado, estado y cárcel en la democracia española. Universidad de Zaragoza (unpublished doctoral Dissertation)
Kemshall H, Wood J (2008) Risk and public protection: responding to involuntary and ‘taboo’ risk. Soc Policy Adm 42:611–629
Koulish R (2010) Immigration and American democracy. Routledge, New York/Abingdon
Lemke T (2011) Biopolitics. New York University Press, New York/London
Loader I, Sparks R (2007) Contemporary landscapes of crime, order and control: governance, risk, and globalization. In: Maguire M, Morgan R, Reiner R (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp 78–101
McLaughlin E, Murji K (2001) Lost connections and new directions: neo-liberalism, new public managerialism and the ‘modernization’ of the British police. In: Stenson K, Sullivan RR (eds) Crime, risk and justice. The politics of crime control in liberal democracies. Willan, Cullompton, pp 104–122
Mezzadra S, Neilson B (2013) Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Duke University Press, Durham/London
Miller P, Rose N (2008) Governing the present. Polity, Cambridge
Monclús Masó M (2008) La gestión penal de la inmigración. Del Puerto, Buenos Aires
Mucchielli L (2008) Faire du chiffre: le ‘nouveau management de la sécurité’. In: Mucchielli L (ed) La frénésie sécuritaire. La Decouverte, Paris, pp 99–112
O’Malley P (2004) Risk, uncertainty and government. Glasshouse Press, London
O’Malley P (2006) Criminology and risk. In: Mythen G, Walklate S (eds) Beyond the risk society. Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp 43–59
O’Malley P (2010) Crime and risk. Sage, London
Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government. How the enterpreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Portilla Contreras G (2007) El Derecho Penal entre el cosmopolitismo universalista y el relativismo posmodernista. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia
Rahola F (2010) La máquina de captura. In: Palidda S et al (eds) Criminalización racista de los migrantes en Europa. Comares, Granada, pp 95–108
Raine JW, Willson MJ (1997) Beyond managerialism in criminal justice. Howard J Crim Justice 36:80–95
Razac O (2008) Avec Foucault. Après Foucault. L’Harmattan, Paris
Romero E (2010) Un deseo apasionado de trabajo más barato y servicial. Migraciones, fronteras y capitalism. Cambalache, Oviedo
Rose N (1999) Powers of freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rose N (2000) Government and control. Br J Criminol 40:321–339
Sciurba A (2009) Campi di forza. Percorsi confinati di migranti in Europa. Ombre corte, Verona
Simon J (2001) ‘Entitlement to cruelty’: the end of welfare and the punitive mentality in the United States. In: Stenson K, Sullivan RR (eds) Crime, risk and justice. The politics of crime control in liberal democracies. Willan, Cullompton, pp 125–143
Simon J, Feeley MM (2003) The form and limits of the new penology. In: Blomberg TG, Cohen S (eds) Punishment and social control, 2nd edn. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 76–116
Sparks R (2000a) Risk and blame in criminal justice controversies. British press coverage and official discourse on prison security (1993–96). In: Brown M, Pratt J (eds) Dangerous offenders. Punishment and social order. Routledge, London/New York, pp 127–143
Sparks R (2000b) Perspectives on risk and penal politics. In: Hope T, Sparks R (eds) Crime, risk and insecurity. Routledge, London/New York, pp 129–145
Sullivan RR (2001) The schizophrenic state: neo-liberal criminal justice. In: Stenson K, Sullivan RR (eds) Crime, risk and justice. The politics of crime control in liberal democracies. Willan, Cullompton, pp 29–47
Tonry M (2004) Thinking about crime. Oxford University Press, New York
Tsoukala A (2002) Le traitement médiatique de la criminalité étrangère en Europe. Déviance et Société 26:61–82
Valverde M (2008) Beyond Discipline and Punish: Foucault’s challenge to criminology. Carceral Notebooks 4:201–223
Van Kalmthout A, Hofstee-van der Meulen F, Dünkel F (2007) Comparative overview, conclusions and recommendations. In: Van Kalmthout AM, Hofstee-van der Meulen FB, Dünkel F (eds) Foreigners in European prisons, vol I. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 7–88
Walters W (2010) Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of aliens. In: De Genova N, Peutz N (eds) The deportation regime. Duke University Press, Durham/London, pp 69–100
Weber L, Bowling B (2004) Policing migration: a framework for investigating the regulation of global mobility. Policing Secur 14:195–212
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brandariz García, J.Á. (2016). Crimmigration Policies and the Great Recession: Analysis of the Spanish Case. In: Guia, M., Koulish, R., Mitsilegas, V. (eds) Immigration Detention, Risk and Human Rights. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24690-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24690-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24688-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24690-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)