Skip to main content

Crimmigration Policies and the Great Recession: Analysis of the Spanish Case

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Immigration Detention, Risk and Human Rights

Abstract

Crimmigration policies, in Spain and elsewhere, have shown a complex interplay between neoliberal and sovereign rationales of control throughout the first decade of the twenty-first century.

However, the analysis of this domain of penal control should be revised in the context of the Great Recession. Indeed, in the Spanish case, crimmigration policies have incorporated a set of innovations in recent years. Some of them, such as the readjustment of the deportation system, can be understood from a neoliberal perspective. Others, such as changes in policing, have a more hybrid profile, in which neoliberal features encounter sovereign and neoconservative trends. Therefore, the context of the Great Recession requires a new analysis of the hybridization between neoliberal and sovereign devices of control in the area of crimmigration policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    New public management (NPM) is an expression which denotes the government policies that since the 1980s have aimed to modernize and allegedly render more efficient the public sector. The basic hypothesis holds that market-oriented management of the public sector will lead to greater cost-efficiency for governments. On the concept of NPM, see Osborne and Gaebler (1992) and Clarke and Newman (1997).

  2. 2.

    On the concept of “expressive justice,” see Tonry (2004), pp. 159 ff.

  3. 3.

    The level of coherence or contradiction between this neoconservative penality and the neoliberal penal policies of risk management and economic utilitarianism must be further researched. While the majority of the academic literature tends to highlight their inherent contradictions (Easton and Piper 2008; Garland 2001; Sullivan 2001), some authors (Kemshall and Wood 2008; Rose 2000; Sparks 2000b) emphasize their consonance.

  4. 4.

    On the Foucaultian concept of “sovereignty,” see also Dean (2010) and De Giorgi (2002).

  5. 5.

    On the concept of apparatuses of “security,” see also Bigo (2011), Dilts (2008), and Valverde (2008).

  6. 6.

    In academic literature, it is highly contested whether high prison population rates are consonant with neoliberal penal trends or if they are, first and foremost, a key feature of a neoconservative penology of harsh punishment. On the former point of view, see O’Malley (2006) and Rose (2000); on the latter perspective, see Garland (2001) and Sullivan (2001). In my opinion, it appears fairly difficult to frame a model of high and rising prison population rates within a pattern of neoliberal penal policies grounded on a principle of economic efficiency, due to the considerable amount of public expenditure that such imprisonment requires.

  7. 7.

    Carrasco Carpio (2008, pp. 229 ff.) estimates that the amount of irregular migrants in Spain by the middle of the decade was over one million people.

  8. 8.

    The figures of the foreign-born resident population are slightly higher than the numbers of foreign resident population due to nationalization practices. According to INE official data, in 2000 the foreign-born population resident in Spain amounted to 3.6 % of the total population; in 2010, it had risen to 14.0 %, and it slightly dropped to 13.4 % in 2014.

  9. 9.

    Circular No. 1/2010 was abrogated by the subsequent right-wing Spanish Government in May 2012, through the Circular No. 2/2012, which changed the official interpretation of police powers to stop, search, and arrest migrants. Nonetheless, the practice of police raids against migrants remained untouched and seems to have sidelined the new normative framework (see Bradford et al. 2013; Fernández Rodríguez de Liévana et al. 2013, p. 58).

  10. 10.

    See ElDiario.es, 03/30/2013.

  11. 11.

    In contrast to the legal framework of many EU jurisdictions, such as Germany, France, or Italy (Van Kalmthout et al. 2007), and of the USA (Koulish 2010), in Spain the irregular stay of a foreigner does not constitute a penal offense, but a civil (administrative) one.

  12. 12.

    See El Periódico, 05/01/2012.

  13. 13.

    The aforementioned evolution of the deportation policy and the concern for public expenditure may be also appreciated in the coetaneous evolution of the prison realm. In effect, the Spanish prison population has dropped by 15.0 % between May 2010 and February 2015, according to Spanish Home Office official data. The most striking feature of this recent evolution is its contradiction with the criminal justice system data, since the number of arrested individuals, the number of convicted individuals, and the number of individuals sentenced to prison have risen during the mentioned period.

  14. 14.

    Nonetheless, the poor official data available in this field leads to certain ambiguities, which require further analysis. In effect, the data provided by the Spanish Home Office are not consistent at all with the ones published by the Fiscalía General del Estado (2014) [Office of the Spanish Attorney General], which accounts for a number of penal deportations far lower than that stated by the Home Office. It may well be the case that a significant amount of the expulsions counted by the Home Office as “qualified” (or criminal) deportations are not formally “criminal” (i.e., enforced by a penal court following a conviction by a criminal offense), but they are the consequence of a criminal conviction or record, even though the sanction is formally an administrative removal. This might allow us to infer that the current Spanish deportation policy seeks efficiency in the use of scarce resources, and also utility of this policy in terms of political currency, by presenting the deported foreigners primarily as dangerous aliens.

  15. 15.

    See also Dean (2007), pp. 93 ff/199 ff.; De Giorgi (2002), pp. 96–97/107; Rose (1999), pp. 23–24/234–235.

  16. 16.

    It should be pointed out that, mirroring the dualism of neoliberal and sovereign control policies, the scholarly literature shows a distinct cleavage in how it analyzes Foucault’s concept of biopolitics. On the one hand, some authors (e.g., Agamben 1998 or Esposito 2008) interpret the concept as a derivative of the Reason of State, tying biopolitics to the notion of sovereign exceptionalism. In contrast, another body of literature (e.g., Hardt and Negri 2000 or Rose 1999) understands biopolitics as a paradigm pertaining to the domain of liberal governmentality. On this debate, see Campesi 2011, pp. 179 ff.; Lemke 2011, pp. 34 ff/51 ff.

References

  • Aebi MF, Delgrande N (2015) Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics. Space I – Prison Populations. Survey 2013. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben G (1998) Homo Sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnistía Internacional (2011) Parad el racismo, no a las personas. Perfiles raciales y control de la inmigración en España

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo D (2011) Security: a field left fallow. In: Dillon M, Neal AW (eds) Foucault on politics, security and war. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth M, Guild M (2008) Governing through migration control: security and citizenship in Britain. Br J Criminol 48:703–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms A (1995) The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In: Clarkson C, Morgan R (eds) The politics of sentencing reform. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 17–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford B et al (2013) Identificación policial por perfil étnico en España: Informe sobre experiencias y actitudes en relación con las actuaciones policiales. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandariz García JA (2011) Sistema penal y control de los migrantes. Gramática del migrante como infractor penal. Granada, Comares

    Google Scholar 

  • Calavita K (2003) A ‘reserve army of delinquents’. The criminalization and economic punishment of immigrants in Spain. Punishment Soc 5:399–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Calavita K (2005) Immigrants at the margins. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campesi G (2011) Soggetto, disciplina, governo. Mimesis, Sesto San Giovanni

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco Carpio C (2008) Mercado de trabajo e inmigración. In: Izquierdo Escribano A (ed) El modelo de inmigración y los riesgos de exclusión. Foessa, Madrid, pp 213–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JH, Newman JE (1997) The managerial state: power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giorgi A (2002) Il governo dell’eccedenza. Postfordismo e controllo della moltitudine. Ombre corte, Verona

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giorgi A (2006) Re-thinking the political economy of punishment. Perspectives on post-fordism and penal politics. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean M (2007) Governing societies. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean M (2010) Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilts A (2008) Michel Foucault meets Gary Becker: criminality beyond discipline and punish. Carceral Notebooks 4:77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton S, Piper C (2008) Sentencing and punishment. The quest for justice, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito R (2008) Bios: biopolitics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Bessa C (2013) Il panorama dei Centri di Internamento per Stranieri in Spagna: dal controllo delle frontieri alla gestione della criminalità. Antigone 8(1):68–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Rodríguez de Liévana G et al (2013) Qué hacemos con las fronteras. Akal, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiscalía General del Estado (2014) Memoria 2014. Ministerio de Justicia, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2007) Security, territory, population. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2008) The birth of biopolitics. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garland D (1997) ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theor Criminol 1:173–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland D (2001) The culture of control. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland D (2003) The rise of risk. In: Ericson RV, Doyle A (eds) Risk and morality. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 48–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt BE (2007) Against prediction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt M, Negri A (2000) Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans J (2006) The politics of insecurity. Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias Skulj A (2011) El cambio en el estatuto de la Ley penal y en los mecanismos de control: flujos migratorios y gubernamentalidad neoliberal. Comares, Granada

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Franco D (2014) La burbuja penal. Mercado, estado y cárcel en la democracia española. Universidad de Zaragoza (unpublished doctoral Dissertation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall H, Wood J (2008) Risk and public protection: responding to involuntary and ‘taboo’ risk. Soc Policy Adm 42:611–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulish R (2010) Immigration and American democracy. Routledge, New York/Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke T (2011) Biopolitics. New York University Press, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader I, Sparks R (2007) Contemporary landscapes of crime, order and control: governance, risk, and globalization. In: Maguire M, Morgan R, Reiner R (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp 78–101

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin E, Murji K (2001) Lost connections and new directions: neo-liberalism, new public managerialism and the ‘modernization’ of the British police. In: Stenson K, Sullivan RR (eds) Crime, risk and justice. The politics of crime control in liberal democracies. Willan, Cullompton, pp 104–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra S, Neilson B (2013) Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Duke University Press, Durham/London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Rose N (2008) Governing the present. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Monclús Masó M (2008) La gestión penal de la inmigración. Del Puerto, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucchielli L (2008) Faire du chiffre: le ‘nouveau management de la sécurité’. In: Mucchielli L (ed) La frénésie sécuritaire. La Decouverte, Paris, pp 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley P (2004) Risk, uncertainty and government. Glasshouse Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley P (2006) Criminology and risk. In: Mythen G, Walklate S (eds) Beyond the risk society. Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp 43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley P (2010) Crime and risk. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government. How the enterpreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Portilla Contreras G (2007) El Derecho Penal entre el cosmopolitismo universalista y el relativismo posmodernista. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahola F (2010) La máquina de captura. In: Palidda S et al (eds) Criminalización racista de los migrantes en Europa. Comares, Granada, pp 95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine JW, Willson MJ (1997) Beyond managerialism in criminal justice. Howard J Crim Justice 36:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razac O (2008) Avec Foucault. Après Foucault. L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero E (2010) Un deseo apasionado de trabajo más barato y servicial. Migraciones, fronteras y capitalism. Cambalache, Oviedo

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N (1999) Powers of freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose N (2000) Government and control. Br J Criminol 40:321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciurba A (2009) Campi di forza. Percorsi confinati di migranti in Europa. Ombre corte, Verona

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon J (2001) ‘Entitlement to cruelty’: the end of welfare and the punitive mentality in the United States. In: Stenson K, Sullivan RR (eds) Crime, risk and justice. The politics of crime control in liberal democracies. Willan, Cullompton, pp 125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon J, Feeley MM (2003) The form and limits of the new penology. In: Blomberg TG, Cohen S (eds) Punishment and social control, 2nd edn. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 76–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks R (2000a) Risk and blame in criminal justice controversies. British press coverage and official discourse on prison security (1993–96). In: Brown M, Pratt J (eds) Dangerous offenders. Punishment and social order. Routledge, London/New York, pp 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks R (2000b) Perspectives on risk and penal politics. In: Hope T, Sparks R (eds) Crime, risk and insecurity. Routledge, London/New York, pp 129–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan RR (2001) The schizophrenic state: neo-liberal criminal justice. In: Stenson K, Sullivan RR (eds) Crime, risk and justice. The politics of crime control in liberal democracies. Willan, Cullompton, pp 29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry M (2004) Thinking about crime. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukala A (2002) Le traitement médiatique de la criminalité étrangère en Europe. Déviance et Société 26:61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde M (2008) Beyond Discipline and Punish: Foucault’s challenge to criminology. Carceral Notebooks 4:201–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kalmthout A, Hofstee-van der Meulen F, Dünkel F (2007) Comparative overview, conclusions and recommendations. In: Van Kalmthout AM, Hofstee-van der Meulen FB, Dünkel F (eds) Foreigners in European prisons, vol I. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 7–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters W (2010) Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of aliens. In: De Genova N, Peutz N (eds) The deportation regime. Duke University Press, Durham/London, pp 69–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber L, Bowling B (2004) Policing migration: a framework for investigating the regulation of global mobility. Policing Secur 14:195–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Ángel Brandariz García .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brandariz García, J.Á. (2016). Crimmigration Policies and the Great Recession: Analysis of the Spanish Case. In: Guia, M., Koulish, R., Mitsilegas, V. (eds) Immigration Detention, Risk and Human Rights. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24690-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24690-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24688-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24690-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics