Skip to main content

Understanding a Rights-Based Approach to Social Policy Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Rights-Based Approach to Social Policy Analysis

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Rights-Based Approaches to Social Work ((SBHRSWP))

Abstract

This chapter makes the case for why we need a rights-based strategy to social policy analysis and presents an overview of how to conduct social policy analyses using a human rights-based approach. The rights-based approach incorporates some of the steps of traditional social policy analyses but goes beyond this to analyze social policies from the perspective of how policies and programs effect or are expected to effect the realization of rights. Rights-based social policies are contextualized within international strategies and instruments in this chapter. Using four cross-cutting human rights principle-based dimensions, participation in the decision-making process, accountability, nondiscrimination, and equality (P.A.N.E.), a guideline is introduced to be used in a rights-based policy analysis approach to identify rights, legal obligations, responsibilities, and roles and ultimately whether policies further or block the realization of human rights. An exercise on health as a human right is suggested at the end of the chapter to help readers reframe social issues from a rights-based perspective, understand the conflicts that may occur in implementing the realization of rights, and provides an example of how to begin to analyze social policies from the rights-based guideline presented in the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bardach, E. (1986). The eight-step path of policy analysis (A handbook for practice). Berkley, CA: Berkeley Academic Press/Odin Readers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E. (2005). A practical guide for policy analysis (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. (2002). Evaluating welfare reform in the United States, Working Paper 8983. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved October 29, 2014, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8983.

  • Bollen, K. A., & Bollen, P. (2000). Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 58–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. E. (2000). The analysis of policy goals and objectives in social programs and policies. In D. E. Chambers (Ed.), Social policy and social programs: A method for the practical public policy analyst (pp. 79–109). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, P. (1997). Democracy and the policy sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, S., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative social protection, IDS Working Paper 232, IDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNitto, D. M. (1995). Social welfare: Politics and public policy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobelstein, A. W. (1996). Social welfare: Policy and analysis. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatenio Gabel, S. (2012). Social protection and children in developing countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(537), 545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (1986). Dimensions of social welfare policy (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (2005). Dimensions of social welfare policy (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ife, J. (2008). Human rights and social work, Revised edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H., & Smith, S. (1998). Institutions and policies for democracy: A discussion paper and comments. Policy Currents, 8, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., & Lerner, D. (Eds.). (1951). The policy sciences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, J. K., Curtain, S., & Mathews, T. J. (2015). Births: Final data for 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports, 64(1), 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M., Goodin, R.E. & Rein, M. (2006). Introduction: The public and its policies. In R. E. Goodin, M. Rein, & M. Moran, (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of public policy. p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, A. (1968). Nation and family: The Swedish experiment in democratic family and population policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1977). The moon and the ghetto. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2014). J collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, E. (2011). Social work and human rights: A foundation for policy and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepulveda, M., & Nyst, C. (2012). The human rights approach to social protection. Enwiko Oy, Finland: Ministry for foreign Affairs of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2009). The public policy theory primer (pp. 1–26). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodaro, M. J. (2004). Comparative politics. A global introduction. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2011). The policy paradox: The art of decision making, Revised Edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD). (2015). Framework for a human rights-based approach to social protection. UNRISD. Retrieved July 2015, from www.unrisd.org/unrisd/…/2461D8D13FF94049C1257D420031B997.

  • Van Ginneken, W. (2003). Extending social security: Policies for developing countries. International Labour Review, 142, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wronka, J. (2008). Human rights and social justice: Social action and service for the helping and health professions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabel, S.G. (2016). Understanding a Rights-Based Approach to Social Policy Analysis. In: A Rights-Based Approach to Social Policy Analysis. SpringerBriefs in Rights-Based Approaches to Social Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24412-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24412-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24410-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24412-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics