Skip to main content

A Standard Internal Calculus for Lewis’ Counterfactual Logics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9323))

Abstract

The logic \({\mathbb V}\) is the basic logic of counterfactuals in the family of Lewis’ systems. It is characterized by the whole class of so-called sphere models. We propose a new sequent calculus for this logic. Our calculus takes as primitive Lewis’ connective of comparative plausibility ≼: a formula A ≼ B intuitively means that A is at least as plausible as B. Our calculus is standard in the sense that each connective is handled by a finite number of rules with a fixed and finite number of premises. Moreover our calculus is “internal”, in the sense that each sequent can be directly translated into a formula of the language. We show that the calculus provides an optimal decision procedure for the logic \(\mathbb{V}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avron, A.: The method of hypersequents in the proof theory of propositional non-classical logics. In: Logic: From Foundations to Applications, pp. 1–32 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., Smets, S.: The logic of conditional doxastic actions. Texts in Logic and Games, Special Issue on New Perspectives on Games and Interaction 4, 9–31 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Board, O.: Dynamic interactive epistemology. Games and Econ. Behavior 49(1), 49–80 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, C.: Conditional logics of normality: a modal approach. AIJ 68(1), 87–154 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chellas, B.F.: Basic conditional logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 133–153 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gent, I.P.: A sequent or tableaux-style system for Lewis’s counterfactual logic \(\mathbb{VC}\). Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33(3), 369–382 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsberg, M.L.: Counterfactuals. Artificial Intelligence 30(1), 35–79 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N.: Weak AGM postulates and strong ramsey test: A logical formalization. Artificial Intelligence 168(1-2), 1–37 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Schwind, C.: Tableau calculus for preference-based conditional logics: PCL and its extensions. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 10(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grahne, G.: Updates and counterfactuals. J. of Logic and Computation 8(1), 87–117 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44(1-2), 167–207 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamarre, P.: Etude des raisonnements non-monotones: Apports des logiques des conditionnels et des logiques modales. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artificial Intelligence 55(1), 1–60 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lellmann, B., Pattinson, D.: Sequent Systems for Lewis’ Conditional Logics. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds.) JELIA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7519, pp. 320–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell Ltd (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metcalfe, G., Olivetti, N., Gabbay, D.: Proof Theory for Fuzzy Logics. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Negri, S., Sbardolini, G.: Proof analysis for Lewis counterfactuals. Tech. Rep. (2014), http://www.helsinki.fi/%7enegri/PALC.pdf

  18. Nute, D.: Topics in conditional logic. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: A sequent calculus for Lewis logic \(\mathbb{V}\): preliminary results. Tech. Rep. (2015), http://www.di.unito.it/%7epozzato/papers/RT0115.pdf

  20. de Swart, H.C.M.: A gentzen- or beth-type system, a practical decision procedure and a constructive completeness proof for the counterfactual logics \(\mathbb{VC}\) and \(\mathbb{VCS}\). Journal of Symbolic Logic 48(1), 1–20 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Olivetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L. (2015). A Standard Internal Calculus for Lewis’ Counterfactual Logics. In: De Nivelle, H. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9323. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24312-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24312-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24311-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24312-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics