Skip to main content

ShRkC: Shard Rank Cutoff Prediction for Selective Search

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9309))

Included in the following conference series:

  • International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval

Abstract

In search environments where large document collections are partitioned into smaller subsets (shards), processing the query against only the relevant shards improves search efficiency. The problem of ranking the shards based on their estimated relevance to the query has been studied extensively. However, a related important task of identifying how many of the top ranked relevant shards should be searched for the query, so as to balance the competing objectives of effectiveness and efficiency, has not received much attention. This task of shard rank cutoff estimation is the focus of the presented work. The central premise for the proposed solution is that the number of top shards searched should be dependent on – 1. the query, 2. the given ranking of shards, and 3. on the type of search need being served (precision-oriented versus recall-oriented task). An array of features that capture these three factors are defined, and a regression model is induced based on these features to learn a query-specific shard rank cutoff estimator. An empirical evaluation using two large datasets demonstrates that the learned shard rank cutoff estimator provides substantial improvement in search efficiency as compared to strong baselines without degrading search effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barroso, L.A., Dean, J., Hölzle, U.: Web Search for a Planet: The Google cluster architecture. IEEE Micro 23, 22–28 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates, R., Murdock, V., Hauff, C.: Efficiency trade-offs in two-tier Web search systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 163–170 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chowdhury, A., Pass, G.: Operational requirements for scalable search systems. In: Proceedings of the CIKM, pp. 435–442 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Risvik, K.M., Aasheim, Y., Lidal, M.: Multi-tier architecture for Web search engines. In: Proceedings of the First Latin American Web Congress, pp. 132–143 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baeza-Yates, R., Castillo, C., Junqueira, F., Plachouras, V., Silvestri, F.: Challenges on distributed Web retrieval. In: Proceedings of the ICDE, pp. 6–20 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kulkarni, A., Callan, J.: Document allocation policies for selective searching of distributed indexes. In: Proceedings of the ACM CIKM, pp. 449–458 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gravano, L., García-Molina, H., Tomasic, A.: GlOSS: text-source discovery over the internet. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 24, 229–264 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Callan, J.P., Lu, Z., Croft, W.B.: Searching distributed collections with inference networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 21–28 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Si, L., Callan, J.: Relevant document distribution estimation method for resource selection. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 298–305 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas, P., Shokouhi, M.: Sushi: Scoring scaled samples for server selection. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 419–426 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shokouhi, M.: Central-Rank-Based Collection Selection in Uncooperative Distributed Information Retrieval. In: Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G. (eds.) ECiR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4425, pp. 160–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ipeirotis, P.G., Gravano, L.: Distributed search over the hidden Web: Hierarchical database sampling and selection. In: Proceedings of the VLDB Conference, pp. 394–405 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arguello, J., Callan, J., Diaz, F.: Classification-based resource selection. In: Proceedings of the ACM CIKM, pp. 1277–1286 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Puppin, D., Silvestri, F., Perego, R., Baeza-Yates, R.: Tuning the capacity of search engines: Load-driven routing and incremental caching to reduce and balance the load. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 28, 5:1–5:36 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aly, R., Hiemstra, D., Demeester, T.: Taily: Shard selection using the tail of score distributions. In: Proceedings of the ACM CIKM, pp. 673–682 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kulkarni, A., Tigelaar, A., Hiemstra, D., Callan, J.: Shard ranking and cutoff estimation for topically partitioned collections. In: Proceedings of the ACM CIKM, pp. 555–564 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Markov, I., Crestani, F.: Theoretical, qualitative, and quantitative analyses of small-document approaches to resource selection. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 32, 9:1–9:37 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Callan, J.: Distributed information retrieval, 127–150 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shokouhi, M., Si, L.: Federated search. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 5, 1–102 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Liaw, A., Wiener, M.: Classification and regression by randomforest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. He, B., Ounis, I.: Query performance prediction. Information Systems 31, 585–594 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cronen-Townsend, S., Zhou, Y., Croft, W.B.: Predicting query performance. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 299–306. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Macdonald, C., Tonellotto, N., Ounis, I.: Learning to predict response times for online scheduling. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 621–630 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anagha Kulkarni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kulkarni, A. (2015). ShRkC: Shard Rank Cutoff Prediction for Selective Search. In: Iliopoulos, C., Puglisi, S., Yilmaz, E. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23826-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23826-5_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23825-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23826-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics