Abstract
Within the framework of hyperelasticity, there are as many different stress measures as there are strain measures. The second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor, a Lagrangian formulation, is the most significant of the stress measures. The formulation and steps for computing it are presented in terms of the Mooney-Rivlin strain-energy function model. The Cauchy stress tensor, an Eulerian formulation, is obtained directly from the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor. The first Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor, an Eulerian-Lagrangian two-point tensor, is also obtained directly from the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor. The transpose of the first Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor is the so-called nominal stress tensor. Both the first Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor and the nominal stress tensor are widely used in the field of hyperelasticity. The Kirchhoff stress tensor (weighted Cauchy stress tensor) is related to the Cauchy stress tensor through a multiplication by the Jacobian (the determinant of the deformation gradient). The Biot stress, a Lagrangian-based stress tensor, is also an important stress measure. Only somewhat recently has it been recognized that the Biot stress tensor is helpful in the understanding of certain fundamental problems in elasticity theory. Two detailed numerical examples are presented.
The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum can be found at DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23273-7_16
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arruda EM, Boyce MC (1993) A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids 41:389–412
Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, New York
Biot MA (1965) Mechanics of incremental deformations. Wiley, New York
Bower AF (2010) Applied mechanics of solids. CRC, Boca Raton
Gould PL (1983) Introduction to linear elasticity. Springer, New York
Gurtin ME (1981) Topics in finite elasticity. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference series in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia, p 35
Jaunzemis W (1967) Continuum mechanics. Macmillan, New York
Malvern LE (1969) Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Marsden JE, Hughes TJR (1983) Mathematical foundations of elasticity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Ogden RW (1997) Non-linear elastic deformations. Dover, New York
Schrodt M, Benderoth G, Kühhorn A, Silber G (2005) Hyperelastic description of polymer soft foams at finite deformations. Tech Mech 25(3–4):162–173
Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1998) Computational inelasticity. Springer, New York
Storakers B (1986) On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 34(2):125–145
Sussman T, Bathe KJ (1987) A finite element formulation for nonlinear incompressible elastic and inelastic analysis. Comput Struct 26:357–409
Truesdell C, Noll W (1965) The non-linear theories of mechanics. In: Flügge S (ed) Encyclopedia of physics, vol 3, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hackett, R.M. (2016). Stress Measures. In: Hyperelasticity Primer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23273-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23273-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23272-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23273-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)