Skip to main content

An Evaluation of Diversification Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (Globe 2015, DEXA 2015)

Abstract

Diversification is a method of improving user satisfaction by increasing the variety of information shown to user. Due to the lack of a precise definition of information variety, many diversification techniques have been proposed. These techniques, however, have been rarely compared and analyzed under the same setting, rendering a ‘right’ choice for a particular application very difficult. Addressing this problem, this paper presents a benchmark that offers a comprehensive empirical study on the performance comparison of diversification. Specifically, we integrate several state-of-the-art diversification algorithms in a comparable manner, and measure distinct characteristics of these algorithms with various settings. We then provide in-depth analysis of the benchmark results, obtained by using both real data and synthetic data. We believe that the findings from the benchmark will serve as a practical guideline for potential applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://code.google.com/p/diversity-benchmark.

  2. 2.

    https://code.google.com/p/diversity-benchmark.

  3. 3.

    https://code.google.com/p/diversity-benchmark.

  4. 4.

    https://code.google.com/p/diversity-benchmark.

  5. 5.

    https://code.google.com/p/diversity-benchmark.

References

  1. http://boston.lti.cs.cmu.edu/clueweb12/TRECcrowdsourcing2013/

  2. Agrawal, R., et al.: Diversifying search results. In: WSDM, pp. 5–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boriah, S., et al.: Similarity measures for categorical data: a comparative evaluation. In: SIAM, pp. 243–254 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braschler, M.: CLEF 2001 - overview of results. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J., Kluck, M. (eds.) CLEF 2001. LNCS, vol. 2406, p. 9. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Carbonell, J., et al.: The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In: SIGIR, pp. 335–336 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chandar, P., et al.: Preference based evaluation measures for novelty and diversity. In: SIGIR, pp. 413–422 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, C.L., et al.: Overview of the trec 2009 web track. Technical report, DTIC Document (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke, C.L., et al.: Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In: SIGIR, pp. 659–666 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, T., et al.: On the complexity of query result diversification. Proc. VLDB Endowment 6, 577–588 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drosou, M., et al.: Search result diversification. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 39, 41–47 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Drosou, M., et al.: Disc diversity: result diversification based on dissimilarity and coverage. Proc. VLDB Endowment 6, 13–24 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabrilovich, E., et al.: Newsjunkie: providing personalized newsfeeds via analysis of information novelty. In: WWW, pp. 482–490 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gollapudi, S., et al.: An axiomatic approach for result diversification. In: WWW, pp. 381–390 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hasan, M., et al.: User effort minimization through adaptive diversification. In: KDD, pp. 203–212 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jain, A., Sarda, P., Haritsa, J.R.: Providing diversity in k-nearest neighbor query results. In: Dai, H., Srikant, R., Zhang, C. (eds.) PAKDD 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3056, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Kando, N., et al.: Overview of IR tasks at the first NTCIR workshop. In: NTCIR, pp. 11–44 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Küçüktunç, O., et al.: Diversified recommendation on graphs: pitfalls, measures, and algorithms. In: WWW, pp. 715–726 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rafiei, D., et al.: Diversifying web search results, pp. 781–790. In: WWW 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Skoutas, D., et al.: Tag clouds revisited. In: CIKM, pp. 221–230 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tong, H., et al.: Diversified ranking on large graphs: an optimization viewpoint. In: KDD, pp. 1028–1036 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vaughan, L., et al.: Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes. Inf. Process. Manag. 40, 693–707 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Verheij, A., et al.: A comparison study for novelty control mechanisms applied to web news stories. In: WI, pp. 431–436 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vieira, M.R., et al.: On query result diversification. In: ICDE, pp. 1163–1174 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, C., et al.: It takes variety to make a world: diversification in recommender systems. In: EDBT, pp. 368–378 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhai, C.X., et al.: Beyond independent relevance: methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. In: SIGIR, pp. 10–17 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, B., Li, H., Liu, Y., Ji, L., Xi, W., Fan, W., Chen, Z., Ma, W.Y.: Improving web search results using affinity graph. In: SIGIR, pp. 504–511 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, X., et al.: Improving diversity in ranking using absorbing random walks. In: NAACL, pp. 97–104 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ziegler, C.N., et al.: Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: WWW, pp. 22–32 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research has received funding from the ScienceWise project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thang, D.C., Tam, N.T., Hung, N.Q.V., Aberer, K. (2015). An Evaluation of Diversification Techniques. In: Chen, Q., Hameurlain, A., Toumani, F., Wagner, R., Decker, H. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. Globe DEXA 2015 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22852-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22852-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22852-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics