Skip to main content

The Lean Theorem Prover (System Description)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction - CADE-25 (CADE 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9195))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Lean is a new open source theorem prover being developed at Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon University, with a small trusted kernel based on dependent type theory. It aims to bridge the gap between interactive and automated theorem proving, by situating automated tools and methods in a framework that supports user interaction and the construction of fully specified axiomatic proofs. Lean is an ongoing and long-term effort, but it already provides many useful components, integrated development environments, and a rich API which can be used to embed it into other systems. It is currently being used to formalize category theory, homotopy type theory, and abstract algebra. We describe the project goals, system architecture, and main features, and we discuss applications and continuing work.

J. Avigad—Work supported by the AFOSR under MURI Grant Number FA9550-15-1-0053.

J. von Raumer—Visiting student from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, sponsored by the Baden-Württemberg-Stipendium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://leanprover.github.io.

  2. 2.

    http://leanprover.github.io/live.

  3. 3.

    http://leanprover.github.io/tutorial.

  4. 4.

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~emc/15815-s15.

References

  1. Asperti, A., Ricciotti, W., Sacerdoti Coen, C., Tassi, E.: The Matita interactive theorem prover. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6803, pp. 64–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Avigad, J., de Moura, L., Kong,S.: Theorem Proving in Lean (2015). http://leanprover.github.io/tutorial/tutorial.pdf

  3. Barras, B., Boutin, S., Cornes, C., Courant, J., Filliatre, J.-C., Gimenez, E., Herbelin, H., Huet, G., Munoz, C., Murthy, C. et al.: The Coq proof assistant reference manual: Version 6.1 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cockx, J., Devriese, D., Piessens, F.: Pattern matching without K. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pp. 257–268. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coquand, T., Huet, G.: The calculus of constructions. Inf. Comput. 76(2–3), 95–120 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Coquand, T., Paulin, C.: Inductively defined types. In: COLOG-88 (Tallinn, 1988), pp. 50–66. Springer, Berlin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Moura, L., Avigad, J., Kong, S., Roux, C.: Elaboration in dependent type theory. Preprint (arXiv)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delahaye, D., Woltzenlogel Paleo, B. (eds.): All about proofs, proofs for all. Mathematical Logic and Foundations, vol. 55 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dybjer, P.: Inductive families. Formal Aspects Comput. 6(4), 440–465 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Goguen, H.H., McBride, C., McKinna, J.: Eliminating dependent pattern matching. In: Futatsugi, K., Jouannaud, J.-P., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Algebra, Meaning, and Computation. LNCS, vol. 4060, pp. 521–540. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison, J.: HOL light: an overview. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds.) TPHOLs 2009. LNCS, vol. 5674, pp. 60–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin-Löf, P.: Intuitionistic type theory. Bibliopolis (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McBride, C., Goguen, H.H., McKinna, J.: A few constructions on constructors. In: Filliâtre, J.-C., Paulin-Mohring, C., Werner, B. (eds.) TYPES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3839, pp. 186–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. McBride, C., McKinna, J.: Functional pearl: I am not a number-I am a free variable. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Haskell, Haskell 2004, pp. 1–9. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, D., Nadathur, G.: Programming with Higher-Order Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nipkow, T., Paulson, L.C.: Isabelle-91. In: Kapur, Deepak (ed.) CADE 1992. LNCS, vol. 607. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nipkow, T., Paulson, L.C., Wenzel, M.: Isabelle/HOL: a proof assistant for higher-order logic, vol. 2283. Springer Science and Business Media (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Norell, U.: Dependently typed programming in Agda. In: Koopman, P., Plasmeijer, R., Swierstra, D. (eds.) AFP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5832, pp. 230–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Owre, S., Rushby, J., Shankar, N.: PVS: a prototype verification system. In: Kapur, Deepak (ed.) CADE 1992. LNCS, vol. 607. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rudnicki, P.: An overview of the Mizar project. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Workshop on Types for Proofs and Programs, pp. 311–330 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Slind, K.: Function definition in higher-order logic. In: von Wright, Joakim, Harrison, J., Grundy, John (eds.) TPHOLs 1996. LNCS, vol. 1125. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Streicher, T.: Investigations into intensional type theory. Ph.D. thesis, LMU (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Univalent Foundations Program. Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics. Institute for Advanced Study (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wenzel, M.M.: Isabelle/Isar - a versatile environment for human-readable formal proof documents. Technical report ( 2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo de Moura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Moura, L., Kong, S., Avigad, J., van Doorn, F., von Raumer, J. (2015). The Lean Theorem Prover (System Description). In: Felty, A., Middeldorp, A. (eds) Automated Deduction - CADE-25. CADE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9195. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21401-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21401-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21400-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21401-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics