Skip to main content

Leveraging EAP-Sparsity for Compressed Sensing of MS-HARDI in \(({\mathbf {k}},{\mathbf {q}})\)-Space

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9123))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Compressed Sensing (CS) for the acceleration of MR scans has been widely investigated in the past decade. Lately, considerable progress has been made in achieving similar speed ups in acquiring multi-shell high angular resolution diffusion imaging (MS-HARDI) scans. Existing approaches in this context were primarily concerned with sparse reconstruction of the diffusion MR signal \(S({\mathbf {q}})\) in the \({\mathbf {q}}\)-space. More recently, methods have been developed to apply the compressed sensing framework to the 6-dimensional joint \(({\mathbf {k}},{\mathbf {q}})\)-space, thereby exploiting the redundancy in this 6D space. To guarantee accurate reconstruction from partial MS-HARDI data, the key ingredients of compressed sensing that need to be brought together are: (1) the function to be reconstructed needs to have a sparse representation, and (2) the data for reconstruction ought to be acquired in the dual domain (i.e., incoherent sensing) and (3) the reconstruction process involves a (convex) optimization.

In this paper, we present a novel approach that uses partial Fourier sensing in the 6D space of \(({\mathbf {k}},{\mathbf {q}})\) for the reconstruction of \(P({\mathbf {x}},{\mathbf {r}})\). The distinct feature of our approach is a sparsity model that leverages surfacelets in conjunction with total variation for the joint sparse representation of \(P({\mathbf {x}}, {\mathbf {r}})\). Thus, our method stands to benefit from the practical guarantees for accurate reconstruction from partial \(({\mathbf {k}},{\mathbf {q}})\)-space data. Further, we demonstrate significant savings in acquisition time over diffusion spectral imaging (DSI) which is commonly used as the benchmark for comparisons in reported literature. To demonstrate the benefits of this approach, we present several synthetic and real data examples.

This research was funded in part by the AFOSR FA9550-12-1-0304 and NSF CCF-1018149 grants to Alireza Entezari and the NIH grant NS066340 to Baba C. Vemuri.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Callaghan, P.T.: Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tuch, D.S.: Q-ball imaging. Mag. Res. Med. (MRM) 52, 1358–1372 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ugurbil, K., Xu, J., et al.: Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the human connectome project. NeuroImage 80, 80–104 (2013). Mapping the Connectome

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lustig, M., Donoho, D., Pauly, J.: Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Mag. Res. Med. (MRM) 58, 1182–1195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Landman, B.A., Wan, H., Bogovic, J., van Zijl, P., Bazin, P.L., Prince, J.: Accelerated compressed sensing of diffusion-inferred intra-voxel structure through adaptive refinement. In: ISMRM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, N., Singh, M.: Compressed sensing based DSI. In: ISMRM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menzel, M., Khare, K., King, K.F., Tao, X., Hardy, C.J., Marinelli, L.: Accelerated DSI in the human brain using compressed sensing. In: ISMRM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Merlet, S.L., Deriche, R.: Continuous diffusion signal, EAP and ODF estimation via compressive sensing in diffusion MRI. Med. Image Anal. 17, 556–572 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Merlet, S., Caruyer, E., Deriche, R.: Parametric dictionary learning for modeling EAP and ODF in diffusion MRI. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012, Part III. LNCS, vol. 7512, pp. 10–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Michailovich, O.V., Rathi, Y., Dolui, S.: Spatially regularized compressed sensing for high angular resolution diffusion imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30, 1100–1115 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mani, M., Jacob, M., Guidon, A., Magnotta, V., Zhong, J.: Acceleration of high angular and spatial resolution diffusion imaging using compressed sensing with multichannel spiral data. Mag. Res. Med. (MRM) 73, 126–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng, J., Shen, D., Yap, P.T.: Joint k-q space compressed sensing for accelerated multi-shell acquisition and reconstruction of the diffusion signal and ensemble average propagator. In: ISMRM, p. 664 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Donoho, D.: Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 1289–1306 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Candès, E., Tao, T.: Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies? IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 5406–5425 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Do, M.N., Vetterli, M.: Image denoising using orthonormal finite ridgelet transform. In: International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology, pp. 831–842. International Society of Optics and Photonics (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ying, L., Demanet, L., Candes, E.: 3D discrete curvelet transform. In: Optics & Photonics 2005, pp. 591413–591413. International Society of Optics and Photonics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, Y.M., Do, M.N.: Multidimensional directional filter banks and surfacelets. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 918–931 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, X., Sakhaee, E., Entezari, A.: Volumetric data reduction in a compressed sensing framework. Comput. Graph. Forum (CGF) 33, 111–120 (2014). Special Issue on EuroVIS

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldstein, T., Osher, S.: The split bregman method for l1-regularized problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2, 323–343 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Willett, R.M.: Smooth sampling trajectories for sparse recovery in MRI. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2011, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 1044–1047, 30 March – 2 April 2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baba C. Vemuri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, J., Sakhaee, E., Entezari, A., Vemuri, B.C. (2015). Leveraging EAP-Sparsity for Compressed Sensing of MS-HARDI in \(({\mathbf {k}},{\mathbf {q}})\)-Space. In: Ourselin, S., Alexander, D., Westin, CF., Cardoso, M. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19992-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19992-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19991-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19992-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics