Skip to main content

The Tripartite Theory of Machiavellian Morality: Judgment, Influence, and Conscience as Distinct Moral Adaptations

  • Chapter
The Evolution of Morality

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

Morality encompasses complex, multidimensional phenomena spanning diverse content areas. In this chapter, we propose a tripartite theory of Machiavellian morality in which moral judgment, moral influence, and moral conscience are functionally distinct moral adaptations. Moral judgment is an adaptation designed to determine how exploitative or benefit-bestowing a conspecific is and to use that information when choosing relationship partners. Moral influence is designed to identify the most cost-effective means of altering the future behavior of others to be less cost-inflicting and more benefit-bestowing. Moral conscience is an adaptation designed to guide one’s own behavior toward others to strategically avoid ramifications from other’s moral judgment and influence mechanisms. Two examples, sexual infidelity and property theft, are used to illustrate the application of a tripartite framework of Machiavellian morality. Finally, we discuss the potential for this framework to clarify the ambiguity within morality literature and to refocus attention on novel areas of research.

The authors thank Dan Conroy-Beam, Frank Mann, Todd Shackelford, and Joy Wyckoff for valuable suggestions on an earlier version of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The “other-praising” emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105–127.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2014, June). When justice isn’t blind. Poster presentation at CEU Summer University program on Morality: Evolutionary Origins and Cognitive Mechanisms, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, N., André, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2013). Just babies: The origins of good and evil. New York: Random House LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. D. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2009). Sexual double standards. Talk presented at annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2006). The murderer next door: Why the mind is designed to kill. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2012). The evolutionary psychology of crime. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 1(1), 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Asao, K. (2013, March). The evolution of sexual morality. Talk presented at Evolution of Morality conference at Oakland University, Rochester, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2008). Adaptations for exploitation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(1), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2011). The evolution of intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(5), 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239(4843), 985–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 91–115). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delton, A., Cosmides, L., Guermo, M., Robertson, T. E., & Tooby, J. (2012). The psychosemantics of free riding: dissecting the Architecture of a Moral Concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1252–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descioli, P., Asao, K., & Kurzban, R. (2012). Omissions and byproducts across moral domains. PLoS One, 7(10), e46963.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeScioli, P., Christner, J., & Kurzban, R. (2011). The omission strategy. Psychological Science, 22(4), 442–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112(2), 281–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 477–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duntley, J., & Buss, D. M. (2004). The evolution of evil. In A. G. Miller (Eds.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 102–123). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2010). The evolution of stalking. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9832-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duntley, J. D., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Darwinian foundations of crime and law. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(5), 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2012). The role of evolutionary explanations in criminology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 4(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: WW Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010). Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13(6), 923–929.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., & Lindeman, M. (1997). Evaluation of theft, lying, and fighting in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(4), 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology, 16(2), 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice, 16(2), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnow, M., Cosmides, L., Pedersen, E. J., & Tooby, J. (2012). What are punishment and reputation for? PLoS One, 7(9), e45662.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. (2005). The evolution of morality. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. (2011). The origins of morality: An evolutionary account. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., Descioli, P., & O’Brien, E. (2007). Audience effects on moralistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D., & Linke, L. (2007). The effect of social category on third party punishment. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2010). Kind toward whom? Mate preferences for personality traits are target specific. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. A. (1980). Factors influencing young children’s use of motives and outcomes as moral criteria. Child Development, 51(3), 823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. J., Kurzban, R., & McCullough, M. E. (2013). Do humans really punish altruistically? A closer look. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1758), 20122723.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. B. (2013). Moralization as protection against exploitation: Do individuals without allies moralize more? Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. B., Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2012). To punish or repair? Evolutionary psychology and lay intuitions about modern criminal justice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(6), 682–695.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., & Nettle, D. (2012). Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology, 118(11), 1096–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Range, F., Horn, L., Viranyi, Z., & Huber, L. (2009). The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(1), 340–345.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon, M., Ishii, K., Watabe, M., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Minimal social cues in the dictator game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., Kurzban, R., & Jones, O. D. (2007). The origins of shared intuitions of justice. Vanderbilt Law Review, 60(6), 1633–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Markwith, M., & Stoess, C. (1997). Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science, 8(2), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(35), 15073–15078.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1997). Cues to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1034–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “Big Three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “Big Three” explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Baumard, N. (2012). Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind & Language, 27(5), 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (2006). Is morality an elegant machine or a kludge? Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(1), 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 231–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D., & Sznycer, D. (2008). Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. In Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (Vol. 15, p. 251).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (2012). The social conquest of earth. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (1995). The moral animal: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Asao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asao, K., Buss, D.M. (2016). The Tripartite Theory of Machiavellian Morality: Judgment, Influence, and Conscience as Distinct Moral Adaptations. In: Shackelford, T., Hansen, R. (eds) The Evolution of Morality. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics