Abstract
Spain has implemented a progressive and comprehensive multi-layered deterrence strategy to control unwanted migration at its borders. This strategy has evolved along three basic lines. Cooperation with African countries (externalization) has been key to fostering fast return procedures, whereas cooperation with the EU (communitarization through joint Frontex operations) has only been complementary to national border control initiatives driven by technological innovation (technologization).
An additional aspect analysed in this chapter is the emergence of a humanitarian border in the Spanish case, a scenario in which new forms of civil mobilization in defence of the human rights of migrants have emerged reactively. Particularly at the land borders in Ceuta and Melilla, the highly visible and well-documented border control practices have raised growing concerns and public debate about the violation of fundamental rights, such as non-refoulement and asylum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Research developed in the framework of MIND Research Project (grant number CSO2014-53680) funded by the Spanish National Research Program (Programa Excelencia), 2015–2017.
- 2.
In a 2004 article, Walters proposed four analytics to conceptualize different facets of the EU’s changing borders and argued that each of these analytics could be associated with a particular “geo-strategy”. Inspired by Michel Foucher’s work, he referred to one of these analytics as “limes”, in reference to the border defense or “strategic figure” of Ancient Rome which marked the boundaries of the Roman Empire. Foucher describes limes as “essentially a strategy aiming both at containing unwelcome migrants and at organizing trade with Romanized peoples (Foucher 1998). “The strategy of limes does not envisage a progressive or eventual subsumption of the exterior territory and its inhabitants. Instead, it effects the institutionalization of asymmetries of economy, culture and order […] It is an asymmetrical relationship which remains a permanent source of tension” (Walters 2004).
- 3.
Seahorse Network is a safe regional satellite communications network coordinated by Spain, to exchange information on maritime irregular immigration in which police authorities from Mauritania, Morocco, Cape Verde and Senegal participate.
- 4.
During 2006 more than 30,000 irregular migrants arrived at the shores (when not intercepted) and ports (after being intercepted) of the Canary Islands. The term “cayuco” refers to a type of wooden fishing boat used in Western African countries. This event was labelled as a “crisis” because there was a sudden amplification of the Atlantic route from Africa to Spain that implied the geographical extension of control efforts beyond the Mediterranean route (Godenau and Zapata 2008).
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
Other European technological projects implemented since 2011 in which Spain actively participated are WIMAS, OPARUS, SEABILLA and PERSEUS (see Godenau 2014).
- 8.
The positive results of the Atlantic Seahorse project have led to the creation of a new multilateral Seahorse network in the Mediterranean, which is currently being implemented and in which participate Spain, Italy, France, Malta, Portugal, Cyprus, Greece and Libya, with the support of the European member states and the European Commission. It is also expected that Algiers, Tunis and Egypt will join this network. The creation of Atlantic Seahorse is another example of the influence of the initiatives developed by Spain on the adoption of multilateral and communitarian measures at the European level.
- 9.
As evidenced by the intensification of the Ceuta and Melilla route after the maritime perimeter was reinforced; see Koslowski 2011, p. 7, about “squeezing the balloon” at the US border.
- 10.
To construct this concept Walters uses the definition of humanitarian government mentioned by Fassin “as the administration of human collectivities in the name of a higher moral principle which sees the preservation of life and the alleviation of suffering as the highest value of action” (Fassin 2007).
- 11.
Among them the Pro-Human Rights Association of Andalusia (APDHA), CEAR, SOS Racismo, Amnesty International or the Acoge Network.
- 12.
A large part of the migration control actions have been implemented over the past decade in Spanish maritime borders. However, the peripheral geography of this kind of intervention has transformed these kinds of control sites into what Coutin denominates “spaces of noexistence” (Coutin 2003).
- 13.
See, for example, PRODEIN videos at vimeo (https://vimeo.com/108211634)
- 14.
See, for example, “The Land Between”, a film by David Fedele (http://thelandbetweenfilm.com/) or “Ceuta douce prison” by Jonathan Millet and Loic H. Rechi (http://ceuta-douce-prison.tumblr.com/)
- 15.
Diario de Sesiones. Congreso de los Diputados, Comisiones, núm. 637, de 24/09/2014.
- 16.
The Spanish border fences at Ceuta and Melilla include several internal razor wire barriers set up on Spanish soil. See http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2014/03/03/actualidad/1393857848_793887.html
- 17.
Debates on the EU approach to migration and the expulsion of migrants from Spain. Plenary sessions [26-11-2014], Press Release, European Parliament.
- 18.
- 19.
Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales, 18 de septiembre de 2014, página 241.
References
Adamson, F. (2006). Crossing borders: International migration and national security. International Security, 31, 165–199.
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Alcalde, A. (2007). The spanish action plan for Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 34(1), 194–198.
Andreas, P. (1998). The escalation of U.S. immigration control in the post-NAFTA era. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 591–615.
Andreas, P. (2000). Border games. Policing the US-Mexico divide. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
APDHA (Asociación proderechos humanos de Andalucía). (2015). Derechos Humanos en la Frontera Sur. Sevilla.
Asín, A. (2008). Acuerdos bilaterales suscritos por España en materia migratoria con países del continente africano. Especial consideración de la readmisión de inmigrantes en situación irregular. Revista de Derecho Constitucional Europeo, 10, 165–188.
Baldacchino, G. (2014). Islands and the offshoring possibilities and strategies of contemporary states: Insights on/for the migration phenomenon on Europe’s southern flank. Island Studies Journal, 9(1), 57–68.
Balibar, E. (2004). We, the people of Europe? Reflections on transnational citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Basaran, T. (2014). Saving lives at sea: Security, law and adverse effects. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16(3), 365–387.
Bigo, D. (2006). Security, exception, ban and surveillance in theorizing surveillance. In D. Lyon (Ed.), The panopticon and beyond (pp. 46–68). Devon: Willan Pb.
Brian, T., & Laczlo, F. (Eds.). (2014). Fatal journeys. Tracking lives lost during migration. Ginebra: International Organization for Migration.
Casas, I., Cobarrubias, S., & Pickles, J. (2014). Good neighbours make good fences: Seahorse operations, border externalization and extra-territoriality. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14, 1–20. doi:10.1177/0969776414541136.
Coutin, S. (2003). Illegality, borderlands, and the space of nonexistence. In R. Perry & B. Maurer (Eds.), Globalization under construction: Governmentality, law, and identity (pp. 171–202). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
De Bruycker, P., Di Bartolomeo, A., & Fargues, P. (2013). Migrants smuggled by sea to the EU: Facts, laws and policy options. Florence: Migration Policy Centre.
De Genova, N., Mezzadra, S., & Pickles, J. (2015). New keywords: Migration and borders. Cultural Studies, 29(1), 55–87.
Dijstelbloem, H., & Meijer, A. (2011). Migration and the new technological borders of Europe. London: Palgrave.
Eschbach, K., Hagan, J., Rodríguez, N., Hernández-León, R., & Bailey, S. (1999). Death at the border. International Migration Review, 33(2), 430–454.
European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The Global Approach to Migration and Mobility. Brussels, 18.11.2011 COM(2011) 743 final.
Fargues, P., & Bonfati, S. (2014). When the best option is a leaky boat: Why migrants risk their lives crossing the Mediterranean and what Europe is doing about it. Florence: European University Institute Migration Policy Centre.
Fargues, P., & Di Bartolomeo, A. (2015). Drowned Europe. Florence: Migration Policy Centre.
Fassin, D. (2007). Humanitarianism: A nongovernmental government. In M. Feher (Ed.), Nongovernmental politics (pp. 149–160). New York: Zone Books.
Ferrer-Gallardo, X. (2011). Territorial (Dis)Continuity dynamics between Ceuta and Morocco: Conflictual fortification Vis-Á-Vis Co-operative interaction at the EU border in Africa. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 102(1), 24–38.
Ferrer-Gallardo, X., & Van Houtum, H. (2014). The deadly EU border control. ACME, An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 13(2), 295–304.
Foucher, M. (1998). The geopolitics of European frontiers. In M. Anderson & E. Bort (Eds.), The frontiers of Europe (pp. 235–250). London: Pinter.
FRA. (2013). Fundamental rights at Europe’s southern sea borders. Vienna: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
Frontex. (2014a). Annual Risk Analysis 2014. Warsaw
Frontex. (2014b, August). FRAN Quarterly 1 (Frontex Risk Analysis Network). Warsaw.
Frontex. (2014c, October) FRAN Quarterly 2 (Frontex Risk Analysis Network). Warsaw.
Frontex. (2014d, June). Frontex report to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on its activities aimed at protecting migrants at international borders, including migrant children. Warsaw.
Godenau, D. (2012). An institutional approach to bordering in islands: The Canary Islands on the African-European migration routes. Island Studies Journal, 7(1), 3–18.
Godenau, D. (2014). Irregular maritime immigration in the Canary Islands: Externalization and communautarisation in the social construction of borders. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 12, 123–142.
Godenau, D., & López-Sala, A. (2016). Multi-layered migration deterrence and technology in Spanish maritime border management. Journal of Borderlands Studies (forthcoming)
Godenau, D., & Zapata, V. M. (2008). The Canary Islands. A transit region between Africa and Europe. In Documento CIDOB n° 17, Immigration flows and the management of the EU’s southern maritime borders. Barcelona: CIDOB.
Grant, S. (2011). Irregular migration and frontier deaths: Acknowledging a right to identity. In M. Dembour & T. Kelly (Eds.), Are human rights for migrants? (pp. 48–68). New York: Routledge.
Guild, E. (2009). Security and migration in the 21st century. Cambrigde: Polity Press.
Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38, 751–777.
Jeandesboz, J. (2011). Beyond the Tartar steppe: EUROSUR and the ethics of European border control practices. In J. P. Burgess & S. Gutwirth (Eds.), Europe under threat? security, migration and integration (pp. 111–132). Brussels: VUB Press.
King, G., & Murray, C. (2001). Rethinking human security. Political Science Quarterly, 116, 585–610.
Kinnvall, C., & Svensson, T. (2014). Governing borders and security: The politics of connectivity and dispersal. London: Routledge.
Koslowski, R. (2011). The evolution of border controls as a mechanism to prevent illegal immigration. Migration Policy Institute: Washington D.C.
Lahav, G., & Guiraudon, V. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate. The case of migration control. Comparative Political Studies, 33(2), 163–195.
López-Sala, A. (2012). The political design of migration control in Southern Europe. In C. Gortázar, C. Parra, B. Segaert, & C. Timmerman (Eds.), European migration and asylum policies: Coherent or contradiction (pp. 209–223). Brussels: Bruylant.
López-Sala, A. (2015a). Exploring dissuasion as a (geo)political instrument in irregular migration control at the southern spanish maritime border. Geopolitics, 20(3), 513–534. doi:10.1080/14650045.2015.1025384.
López-Sala, A. (2015b). La inmigración irregular en Ceuta y Melilla en 2014: prácticas de control y debate público. In J. Arango, D. Moya, J. Oliver, & E. Sánchez (Eds.), Anuario de la Inmigración en España 2014 (pp. 170–191). Barcelona: CIDOB.
López-Sala, A., & Esteban, V. (2010). La nueva arquitectura política del control migratorio en la frontera marítima del suroeste de Europa: los casos de España y Malta. In E. Anguiano & A. López-Sala (Eds.), Migraciones y fronteras. Nuevos contornos para la movilidad internacional (pp. 75–102). Icaria Editorial: Barcelona.
Mainwaring, C. (2012). Constructing a crisis: The role of immigration detention in Malta. Population, Place and Space, 18, 687–700.
Mau, S., Brabant, H., Lause, L., & Roos, C. (2012). Liberal states and freedom of movement. Selective borders, unequal mobility. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Meneses, G. (2003). Human rights and undocumented migration along the Mexican-U.S. Border. UCLA Law Review 267.
Morehouse, C., & Blomfield, M. (2011). Irregular migration in Europe. Washington: Migration Policy Institute.
Mountz, A., & Hiemstra, N. (2014). Chaos and crisis: Dissecting the spatiotemporal logics of contemporary migrations and state practices. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(2), 382–390.
Newland, K. (2014). Protection at sea: Addressing irregular maritime migration. Washington: Migration Policy Institute.
Nyers, P., & Rygiel, K. (2012). Citizenship, migrant activism and the politics of movement. London: Routledge.
Paasi, A. (2014). The shifting landscape of border studies and the challenge of relational thinking. In M. Bufon, J. Minghi, & A. Paasi (Eds.), The new European frontiers: Social and spatial (re)integration issues in multicultural and border regions (pp. 361–376). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pickering, S., & Weber, L. (Eds.). (2006). Borders, mobility and technologies of control. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rudolph, C. (2003). Security and the political economy of international migration. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 603–620.
Triandafyllidou, A., & Dimitriadi, A. (2013). Migration management at the outpost of the European Union. Griffith Law Review, 22(3), 598–618.
Van Houtum, H. (2010). Human blacklisting: The global apartheid of the EU’s external border regime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(6), 957–976.
Walters, W. (2004). The frontiers of the European Union: A geostrategic perspective. Geopolitics, 9(3), 674–698.
Walters, W. (2011). Foucault and frontiers: Notes on the birth of the humanitarian border. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges (pp. 138–164). New York: Routledge.
Weber, L. (2013). Visible and virtual borders. Griffith Law Review, 22(3), 666–682.
Weber, L., & Pickering, S. (2011). Globalization and borders. Death at the global frontier. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Wolff, S. (2012). La gestión integrada de las fronteras de la UE después de Lisboa. Contrastando políticas y prácticas. In R. Zapata-Barrero & X. Ferrer-Gallado (Eds.), Fronteras en movimiento. Migraciones hacia la Unión Europea en el contexto Mediterráneo (pp. 57–78). Barcelona: Bellaterra.
Wonders, N. (2006). Global flows, semi-permeable borders and the new channels of inequality. In S. Pickering & L. Weber (Eds.), Borders, mobility and technologies of control (pp. 63–86). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zolberg, A. (2003). The archaeology of “Remote” control. In A. Fahrmeir, O. Faron, & P. Weil (Eds.), Migration control in the North Atlantic World. The evolution of state practices in Europe and the United States from the French Revolution to the Inter-War Period (pp. 195–221). New York: Berghahn Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
López-Sala, A., Godenau, D. (2016). Integrated Border Management and Irregular Migration at the South European-North African Border: The Case of Spain. In: Bossong, R., Carrapico, H. (eds) EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17560-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17560-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17559-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17560-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)