Skip to main content

Lung-Protective Ventilation and Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

  • Chapter
Reducing Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Abstract

Lung-protective ventilation involves the use of low tidal volumes, moderate-to-high levels of positive end expiratory pressure and, sometimes, recruitment maneuvers (i.e. a transitory increase in transpulmonary pressure aimed at opening atelectatic alveoli). It may prevent or attenuate ventilator induced lung injury and has been widely shown to reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung-protective ventilation is, actually, one of the interventions best proven to have an impact on mortality in critically ill patients. In fact, three multicenter randomized controlled trials found that ventilation with low tidal volumes, with or without high positive end expiratory pressure, improves survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, two recent meta-analyses failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of high positive end expiratory pressure. Therefore, evidence about high positive end expiratory pressure is not as conclusive as that about low tidal volumes and further trials are needed in order to define “best” positive end expiratory pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Walkey AJ, Summer R, Ho V et al (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: epidemiology and management approaches. Clin Epidemiol 4:159–169

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Silversides JA, Ferguson ND (2013) Clinical review: acute respiratory distress syndrome – clinical ventilator management and adjunct therapy. Crit Care 17(2):225

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Villar J, Fernández RL, Ambrós A et al (2015) A clinical classification of the acute respiratory distress syndrome for predicting outcome and guiding medical therapy. Crit Care Med 43(2):346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM (2013) Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 369(22):2126–2136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fish E, Novack V, Banner-Goodspeed VM et al (2014) The esophageal pressure-guided ventilation 2 (EPVent2) trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial of mechanical ventilation guided by transpulmonary pressure. BMJ Open 4(9):e006356

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutherasan Y, Vargas M, Pelosi P (2014) Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 18(2):211

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lellouche F, Lipes J (2013) Prophylactic protective ventilation: lower tidal volumes for all critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med 39(1):6–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R (1990) Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 16:372–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM et al (1998) Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 338:347–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Villar J, Kacmarek RM, Pérez-Méndez L et al (2006) A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med 34(5):1311–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C et al (2013) A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 369(5):428–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A et al (2010) Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 303(9):865–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Santa Cruz R, Rojas JI, Nervi R et al (2013) High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD009098

    Google Scholar 

  15. Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A et al (2008) Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 359:2095–2104

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marini JJ (2013) Lower tidal volumes for everyone: principle or prescription? Intensive Care Med 39(1):3–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A et al (2013) Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med 39(5):847–856

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landoni G, Comis M, Conte M, Finco G, Mucchetti M, Paternoster G et al (2015) Mortality in Multicenter Critical Care Trials: An Analysis of Interventions with a Significant Effect. Crit Care Med. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 25821918

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L et al (2012) The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med 38(10):1573–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Villar J, Sulemanji D, Kacmarek RM (2014) The acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence and mortality, has it changed? Curr Opin Crit Care 20(1):3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A (2005) The concept of “baby lung”. Intensive Care Med 31:776–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Severgnini P, Selmo G, Lanza C et al (2013) Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function. Anesthesiology 118:1307–1321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pelosi P, Barassi A, Severgnini P et al (2008) Prognostic role of clinical and laboratory criteria to identify early ventilator associated pneumonia in brain injury. Chest 134:101–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldenberg NM, Steinberg BE, Lee WL et al (2014) Lung-protective ventilation in the operating room: time to implement? Anesthesiology 121(1):184–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Pisano MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pisano, A., Iovino, T.P., Maj, R. (2015). Lung-Protective Ventilation and Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. In: Landoni, G., Mucchetti, M., Zangrillo, A., Bellomo, R. (eds) Reducing Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17515-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17515-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17514-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17515-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics