Abstract
Lung-protective ventilation involves the use of low tidal volumes, moderate-to-high levels of positive end expiratory pressure and, sometimes, recruitment maneuvers (i.e. a transitory increase in transpulmonary pressure aimed at opening atelectatic alveoli). It may prevent or attenuate ventilator induced lung injury and has been widely shown to reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung-protective ventilation is, actually, one of the interventions best proven to have an impact on mortality in critically ill patients. In fact, three multicenter randomized controlled trials found that ventilation with low tidal volumes, with or without high positive end expiratory pressure, improves survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, two recent meta-analyses failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of high positive end expiratory pressure. Therefore, evidence about high positive end expiratory pressure is not as conclusive as that about low tidal volumes and further trials are needed in order to define “best” positive end expiratory pressure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Walkey AJ, Summer R, Ho V et al (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: epidemiology and management approaches. Clin Epidemiol 4:159–169
Silversides JA, Ferguson ND (2013) Clinical review: acute respiratory distress syndrome – clinical ventilator management and adjunct therapy. Crit Care 17(2):225
Villar J, Fernández RL, Ambrós A et al (2015) A clinical classification of the acute respiratory distress syndrome for predicting outcome and guiding medical therapy. Crit Care Med 43(2):346–353
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM (2013) Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 369(22):2126–2136
Fish E, Novack V, Banner-Goodspeed VM et al (2014) The esophageal pressure-guided ventilation 2 (EPVent2) trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial of mechanical ventilation guided by transpulmonary pressure. BMJ Open 4(9):e006356
Sutherasan Y, Vargas M, Pelosi P (2014) Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 18(2):211
Lellouche F, Lipes J (2013) Prophylactic protective ventilation: lower tidal volumes for all critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med 39(1):6–15
Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R (1990) Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 16:372–377
Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM et al (1998) Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 338:347–354
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308
Villar J, Kacmarek RM, Pérez-Méndez L et al (2006) A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med 34(5):1311–1318
Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C et al (2013) A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 369(5):428–437
Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A et al (2010) Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 303(9):865–873
Santa Cruz R, Rojas JI, Nervi R et al (2013) High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD009098
Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A et al (2008) Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 359:2095–2104
Marini JJ (2013) Lower tidal volumes for everyone: principle or prescription? Intensive Care Med 39(1):3–5
Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A et al (2013) Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med 39(5):847–856
Landoni G, Comis M, Conte M, Finco G, Mucchetti M, Paternoster G et al (2015) Mortality in Multicenter Critical Care Trials: An Analysis of Interventions with a Significant Effect. Crit Care Med. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 25821918
Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L et al (2012) The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med 38(10):1573–1582
Villar J, Sulemanji D, Kacmarek RM (2014) The acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence and mortality, has it changed? Curr Opin Crit Care 20(1):3–9
Gattinoni L, Pesenti A (2005) The concept of “baby lung”. Intensive Care Med 31:776–784
Severgnini P, Selmo G, Lanza C et al (2013) Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function. Anesthesiology 118:1307–1321
Pelosi P, Barassi A, Severgnini P et al (2008) Prognostic role of clinical and laboratory criteria to identify early ventilator associated pneumonia in brain injury. Chest 134:101–108
Goldenberg NM, Steinberg BE, Lee WL et al (2014) Lung-protective ventilation in the operating room: time to implement? Anesthesiology 121(1):184–188
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pisano, A., Iovino, T.P., Maj, R. (2015). Lung-Protective Ventilation and Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. In: Landoni, G., Mucchetti, M., Zangrillo, A., Bellomo, R. (eds) Reducing Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17515-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17515-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17514-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17515-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)