Skip to main content

An Ontological Approach for Knowledge Modeling and Reasoning Over Heterogeneous Crop Data Sources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Analysis, Intelligent Security and the Internet of Things

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 355))

Abstract

The past two decades have seen a remarkable shift in the knowledge- and information-sharing paradigm. In the crops domain, for example, the amount of information currently known about underutilized crops, for example, Bambara groundnut their genetics and agronomy are much richer than years before. That paradigm shift offers enormous potential for advancing knowledge representation systems to facilitate access to such data. However, inconsistencies in terminology, improper syntax, and semantics are main obstacles to sharing data and knowledge among disparate researchers. We present a formal framework for representing knowledge using OWL 2 RL ontologies and SWRL rules and to integrate and reason over data from multiple, heterogeneous underutilized crops data sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bohring, H., Auer, S.: Mapping XML to OWL Ontologies. In: Leipziger Informatik-Tage, vol. 72, pp. 147–156 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the AAAI’97 Spring Symposium Series on Ontological Engineering, pp. 33–40 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: a semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. Acknowledged W3C Submission, Standards Proposal Research Report: Version 0.6 (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacob, E.K.: Ontologies and the semantic web. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 29, 19–22 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lauser, B., Sini, M.: From AGROVOC to the agricultural ontology service/concept server: an owl model for creating ontologies in the agricultural domain. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Metadata for Knowledge and Learning, pp. 76–88. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Matteis, L., Chibon, P.Y., Espinosa, H., Skofic, M., Finkers, R., Bruskiewich, R., Hyman, J.M., Arnoud, E.: Crop ontology: vocabulary for crop-related concepts. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Motik, B., Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A., Lutz, C.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Profiles, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/ (December 2012)

  9. Noy, N.F.: Ontology management with the PROMPT plugin. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Protégé Conference (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Technical report, Stanford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pinto, H.S., Tempich, C., Staab, S.: Diligent: towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering of ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 393–397. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shrestha, R., Matteis, L., Skofic, M., Portugal, A., McLaren, G., Hyman, G., Arnaud, E.: Bridging the phenotypic and genetic data useful for integrated breeding through a data annotation using the crop ontology developed by the crop communities of practice. Front. Physiol. 3(326), 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soergel, D., Lauser, B., Liang, A.C., Fisseha, F., Keizer, J., Katz, S.: Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the AGROVOC example. J. Digital Inf. 4(4) 1–19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thunkijjanukij, A.: Ontology development for agricultural research knowledge management: a case study for Thai rice. Ph.D. thesis, Kasetsart University, Thailand (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdur Rakib .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rakib, A., Lawan, A., Walker, S. (2015). An Ontological Approach for Knowledge Modeling and Reasoning Over Heterogeneous Crop Data Sources . In: Abraham, A., Muda, A., Choo, YH. (eds) Pattern Analysis, Intelligent Security and the Internet of Things. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17398-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17398-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17397-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17398-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics