Skip to main content

Distributions of Opinion and Extremist Radicalization: Insights from Agent-Based Modeling

  • Chapter
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8851))

Included in the following conference series:

  • International Conference on Social Informatics

Abstract

We apply an agent-based opinion dynamics model to investigate the distribution of opinions and the size of opinion clusters. We use parameter sweeps to examine the sensitivity of opinion distributions and cluster sizes relative to changes in individuals’ tolerance and uncertainty. Our results demonstrate that opinion distributions and cluster sizes are structurally unstable, not stationary, and have fat tails in most configurations of the model, rather than stable Gaussian distributions. Hence, extremist radical individuals occur far more frequently than “normally” expected. Opinion clusters, in addition to being fat-tailed, reveal a dynamic transition from lognormal to exponential distributions as parameters change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Costa Filho, R.N., Almeida, M.P., Andrade, J.S., Moreira, J.E.: Scaling behavior in a proportional voting process. Physical Review E 60(1), 1067 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., Williams, J.: Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 59(4), 273–286 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atran, S., Ginges, J.: Religious and Sacred Imperatives in Human Conflict. Science 336(6083), 855–857 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alizadeh, M., Coman, A., Lewis, M., Cioffi-Revilla, C.: Intergroup Conflict Escalation Leads to more Extremism. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 17(4), 4 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeitzoff, T.: Using Social Media to Measure Conflict Dynamics: An Application to the 2008–2009 Gaza Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 938–969 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tufekci, Z., Wilson, C.: Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication 62(2), 363–379 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elson, S.B., Yeung, D., Roshan, P., Bohandy, S.R., Nader, A.: Using Social Media to Gauge Iranian Public Opinion and Mood After the, Election. RAND Corporation Technical Report (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell, A., Hitlin, P.: Twitter reaction to events often at odds with overall public opinion. Pew Research Center (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell, A., Guskin, E.: Twitter News Consumers: Young, Mobile and Educated. Pew Research Center (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Festinger, L.A.: Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sherif, M., Hovland, C.I.: Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Yale University Press, Oxford (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33–47 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Axelrod, R.: The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(2), 203–226 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flache, A., Macy, M.W.: Local Convergence and Global Diversity: From Interpersonal to Social Influence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(6), 970–995 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems 3(1-4), 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huet, S., Deffuant, G., Jager, W.: Rejection mechanism in 2D bounded confidence provides more conformity. Advances in Complex Systems 11(4), 529–549 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mäs, M., Flache, A., Kitts, J.: Cultural Integration and Differentiation in Groups and Organizations. In: Dignum, V., Dignum, F. (eds.) Perspectives on Culture and Agent-based Simulations, vol. 3, pp. 71–90. Springer International Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mäs, M., Flache, A., Helbing, D.: Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6(10), e1000959 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weidlich, W.: The statistical description of polarization phenomena in society. British. Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 24, 251–266 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sznajd-Weron, K.J.S.: Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C 11(6), 1157–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Galam, S.: Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions. Physical Review E 71(4), 046123 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 591–646 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilbert, N.: Agent-Based Models. Sage Publishers, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cioffi-Revilla, C.: Introduction to Computational Social Science: Principles and Applications. London and Heidelberg. Springer (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Hegselmann, R., Krauze, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3) (2002), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html

  26. Deffuant, G.: Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(3) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alstott, J., Bullmore, E., Plenz, D.: powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions. PLoS ONE 9(4), e95816 (2014), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095816

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., Newman, M.E.J.: Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data. SIAM Review 51(4), 661–703 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, M.A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., Himelboim, I.: Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. Pew Research Center (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kellstedt, P.: Race prejudice and Power Laws of Extremism. In: Cioffi-Revilla, C. (ed.) Power Laws and Non-Equilibrium Distributions of Complexity in the Social Sciences (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alizadeh, M., Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2014). Distributions of Opinion and Extremist Radicalization: Insights from Agent-Based Modeling. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8851. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13733-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13734-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics