Skip to main content

Enabling Cross-Domain Reuse of Tool Qualification Certification Artefacts

  • Conference paper
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8696))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The development and verification of safety-critical systems increasingly relies on the use of tools which automate/replace/ supplement complex verification and/or development tasks. The safety of such systems risks to be compromised, if the tools fail. To mitigate this risk, safety standards (e.g. DO-178C/DO330, IEC 61508) define prescriptive tool qualification processes. Compliance with these processes can be required for (re-)certification purposes. To enable reuse and thus reduce time and cost related to certification, cross-domain tool manufacturers need to understand what varies and what remains in common when transiting from one domain to another. To ease reuse, in this paper we focus on verification tools and model a cross-domain tool qualification process line. Finally, we discuss how reusable cross-domain process-based arguments can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. IEC61508: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. RTCA Inc.: Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, RTCA DO-178C (EUROCAE ED-12C), Washington DC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. RTCA Inc.: Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, RTCA DO-178B (EUROCAE ED-12B), Washington DC (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gallina, B., Kashiyarandi, S., Martin, H., Bramberger, R.: Modeling a safety- and automotive-oriented process line to enable reuse and flexible process derivation. In: 8th IEEE International Workshop Quality-Oriented Reuse of Software (July 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Camus, J.L., Dewalt, M.P., Pothon, F., Ladier, G., Boulanger, J.L., Blanquart, J.P., Quere, P., Ricque, B., Gassino, J.: Tool qualification in multiple domains: Status and perspectives. In: Embedded Real Time Software and Systems, Toulouse, France, February 5-7, vol. 7991. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kornecki, A.J., Zalewski, J.: Design tool assessment (December 15, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kornecki, D.A.J., Zalewski, D.J.: The qualification of software development tools from the DO-178B certification perspective. CrossTalk - The Journal of Defense Software Engineering (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Slotosch, O.: Model-Based Tool Qualification: The Roadmap of Eclipse towards Tool Qualification. In: Cerone, A., Persico, D., Fernandes, S., Garcia-Perez, A., Katsaros, P., Ahmed Shaikh, S., Stamelos, I. (eds.) SEFM 2012 Satellite Events. LNCS, vol. 7991, pp. 216–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO26262: Road vehicles Functional safety. International Standard (November 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallina, B., Sljivo, I., Jaradat, O.: Towards a Safety-oriented Process Line for Enabling Reuse in Safety Critical Systems Development and Certification. In: Post-Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, SEW-35, Greece (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Object Management Group: Software & Systems Process Engineering Meta-Model (SPEM), v2.0. Full Specification formal/08-04-01 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallina, B., Pitchai, K.R., Lundqvist, K.: S-TunExSPEM: Towards an Extension of SPEM 2.0 to Model and Exchange Tunable Safety-oriented Processes. In: Lee, R. (ed.) SERA 2013. SCI, vol. 496, pp. 215–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Eclipse Process Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/epf/

  14. GSN: Community Standard Version 1 (November 2011), http://www.goalstructuringnotation.info/documents/GSN_Standard.pdf

  15. Dardar, R., Gallina, B., Johnsen, A., Lundqvist, K., Nyberg, M.: Industrial experiences of building a safety case in compliance with iso 26262. In: IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW), pp. 349–354 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gallina, B., Gallucci, A., Lundqvist, K., Nyberg, M.: VROOM & cC: A Method to Build Safety Cases for ISO 26262-compliant Product Lines. In: SAFECOMP Workshop on Next Generation of System Assurance Approaches for Safety-Critical Systems (SASSUR), HAL/CNRS Report (September 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gallina, B., et al.: nSafeCer, D121.1: Generic process model for integrated development and certification (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ARTEMIS-JU-269265: SafeCer-Safety Certification of Software-Intensive Systems with Reusable Components (2013), http://www.safecer.eu/

  19. SYNOPSIS-SSF-RIT10-0070: Safety Analysis for Predictable Software Intensive Systems. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research

    Google Scholar 

  20. FP7 OPENCOSS: Open platform for evolutionary certification of safety-critical systems

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chung, P.W.H., Cheung, L.Y.C., Machin, C.H.C.: Compliance flow - managing the compliance of dynamic and complex processes. Know.-Based Syst. 21(4), 332–354 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Espinoza, H., Ruiz, A., Sabetzadeh, M., Panaroni, P.: Challenges for an open and evolutionary approach to safety assurance and certification of safety-critical systems. In: First International Workshop on Software Certification (WoSoCER), pp. 1–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Braga, R.T.V., Trindade Jr., O., Castelo Branco, K.R., Neris, L.D.O., Lee, J.: Adapting a Software Product Line Engineering Process for Certifying Safety Critical Embedded Systems. In: Ortmeier, F., Lipaczewski, M. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7612, pp. 352–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kashiyarandi, S.: Reusing Process Elements in the Context of Safety Critical Systems Development and Certification. Master’s thesis, Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Sweden (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Asghar Ali, E.: Deriving reusable process-based arguments from process models in the context of safety critical systems development and certification. Master’s thesis, Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Sweden (ongoing)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gallina, B., Kashiyarandi, S., Zugsbratl, K., Geven, A. (2014). Enabling Cross-Domain Reuse of Tool Qualification Certification Artefacts. In: Bondavalli, A., Ceccarelli, A., Ortmeier, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8696. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10557-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10557-4_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10556-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10557-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics