Abstract
Computational thinking resembles a new philosophy in order to approach not only scientific problems but also challenges of everyday life. In recent years, computational thinking reveals more and more as a fundamental skill for everyone. Observing that, the educational community has been interested in the designing of appropriate teaching and pedagogical strategies by incorporating procedures for the cultivation and development of computational thinking during the learning process. In this context, the utilization of gamification aims at activating the participation of students. In particular, a common application of gamification is the empowerment of extrinsic motivation through the integration of grading characteristics comparable with those of video games, such as points, levels, and achievements. However, the activation of external motives, while disregarding the internal ones, may lead to the declination of interest in learning. This work defines a student-centered framework for strengthening the active participation of students using intrinsic motivation for learning and develops a framework for designing educational activities. As a guide to framework application, three prototype scenarios and the corresponding correlations to the computational thinking, gamification and constructivist learning theory goals throughout the learning activities are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community. ACM InRoads, 2(1), 48–54.
Bogost, I. (2011). Gamification is bullshit. The Atlantic: Technology. Retrieved August 2013, from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/08/gamification-is-bullshit/243338/
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). Using artifact-based interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design. Paper presented at annual AERA meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Carstens, A., & Beck, J. (2005). Get ready for the gamer generation. TechTrends, 49(3), 22–25.
Chen, C. A. (2003). Constructivist approach to teaching: Implications in teaching computer networking. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 21(2), 17–27.
Clarke, Ε., & Wing, J. M. (1996). Formal methods: State of the art and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4), 626–643. Special issue.
Codeacademy. (2013). Retrieved September 2013, http://www.codecademy.com/
Computational Thinking Teachers Resources. (2013). Retrieved September 2013, from http://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/471.11CTLeadershiptToolkit-SP-vF.pdf
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.
Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivations in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Dempsey, J. V., Haynes, L., Lucassen, B. A., & Casey, M. S. (2002). Forty simple computer and what they could mean to educators. Simulation and Gaming, 33(2), 157–168.
Denning, P. (2009). The profession of IT: Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6).
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “Gamification”. Proceedings from MindTrek ‘11. Tampere, Finland: ACM.
Facer, K. (2003). Computer games and learning. Retrieved August 2013, from http://www.nestafuturelab.org/research/discuss/02discuss01.htm
Henderson, P. B. (2009). Ubiquitous computational thinking. Computer, 42(10), 100–102. Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MC.2009.334
KhanAcademy. (2013). Retrieved September 2013, from http://www.khanacademy.org/
Kodu. (2013). Retrieved September 2013, from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/kodu/
Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kotini, Ι., & Τzelepi, S. (2012). The contribution of computational thinking in the preparation of future citizens. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Informatics in Education 2012, 5-7 October 2012 Piraeus, Greek (pp. 221–228).
Kotini, Ι., & Τzelepi, S. (2013a). Theoretical student-centered gamification model for the active participation of students in computational thinking—developing activities. Proceedings of the 7th Panhellenic Conference of Teachers in Informatics, Thessaloniki, Greek.
Kotini, Ι., & Τzelepi, S. (2013b). Designing an education lesson of Informatics based on the principles of constructivism, computational thinking and gamification. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Informatics in Education 2013, 15-17 October 2013 Piraeus, Greek
Kotini, I., & Tzelepi, S. (2013c). Constructivist learning theory as education model in informatics. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Informatics in Education 2013, 15-17 October 2013 Piraeus, Greek.
Kumar, N. B. (2013). A framework for designing gamification in the enterprise. Infosys Labs Briefings, 11(3), 8–13.
LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 54–64.
Laster, J. (2010). A class on game design has students playing to win. Retrieved January 2013, from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/at-indiana-u-a-class-on-game-design-has-students-playing-to-win/21981
Learning-Theories. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.learningtheories.com
Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., et al. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM InRoads, 2(1), 32–37.
Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 260–264.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.
Maroney, K. (2001, May). My entire waking life. The Games Journal. Retrieved January 2013, from http://www.thegamesjournal.com/articles/MyEntireWakingLife.shtml
Masuyama, K. (2006). Constructive or instructive approach? Which online pedagogy is better in a foreign language course? In E. Pearson, & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin Press.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computers. New York: Basic Books.
Robertson, M. (2010). Can’t play, won’t play. Hide & Seek: Inventing New Kinds of Play. Retrieved July 2013, from http://www.hideandseek.net/2010/10/06/cant-play-wont-play/
Scratch. (2013, September). Scratch. Retrieved from http://scratch.mit.edu/
Shaffer, D., Squire, K., Halverson, R. & Gee, J. (2004). Video games and the future of learning. University of Wisconsin Madison and Academic Advanced Distributed Learning Co- Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/gappspaper1.pdf
Thramboulidis, K. (2005). Teaching advanced computing concepts in Java: A constructivism-based approach. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 7(3).
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
Yadav, Α., Zhou, Ν., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. SIGCSE ‘11 Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 465–470).
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kotini, I., Tzelepi, S. (2015). A Gamification-Based Framework for Developing Learning Activities of Computational Thinking. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L. (eds) Gamification in Education and Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10207-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10208-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)