Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imaginary Contradictions of University Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Incentives and Performance

Abstract

New modes of managerial governance have caused universities to function more like companies and produce non-intended effects as well as imaginary contradictions. In this article, four of these contradictions are discussed to provide answers to the following research questions: Do professors have a higher commitment to their organization or to their peers in the scientific community? Which factors strengthen the affective organizational commitment? Which work environment supports intrinsic motivation at universities? Can universities provide incentives that do not crowd out intrinsic motivation? A theoretical underpinning of hypotheses will be provided, and these hypotheses will be tested using two nationwide surveys of German professors. The empirical results demonstrate that commitment to professional peers increases affective organizational commitment. In the perception of German professors, there is no contradiction between profession and organization, but the newly implemented steering instruments increase organizational commitment. In addition, the results also provide evidence that autonomy, relatedness, and perceived competence increase intrinsic teaching motivation. These findings support the Self-Determination Theory. The results also provide some evidence of a crowding-out effect of the new steering instruments and that teaching awards do not crowd out intrinsic motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler PS, Heckscher C (2006) Towards collaborative community. In: Heckscher C, Adler PS (eds) The firm as collaborative community. Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 11–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler PS, Heckscher C (2011) From clans to collaboration: collaborative community as the basis of organizational ambidexterity. Working paper. https://t.co/JMYiMI9s. Accessed 1 May 2014

  • Ahrne G, Brunsson N (2011) Organization outside organizations: the significance of partial organization. Organization 18(1):83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Avolio BJ (1993) Transformational leadership and organizational culture. PAQ Spring 1993:112–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard CI (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1988) Homo Academicus. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney BM, Getz I (2009) Freedom, Inc. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer H, Endres J, Schimank U (2007) On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In: Jansen D (ed) New forms of governance in research organizations. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J (1989) The cement of society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fernet C, Senécal C, Guay F, Marsh H, Dowson M (2008) The work tasks motivation scale for teachers (WTMST). J Career Assess 16:256–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson E (2001) Professionalism. The third logic. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (1997) Not just for the money. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Neckermann S (2008) Academics appreciate awards: a new aspect of incentives in research. Working paper 32. Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, University of Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Osterloh M (2002) Successful management by motivation. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Homberg F, Osterloh M (2013) Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organ Stud 34(7):949–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost J, Osterloh M, Weibel A (2010) Governing knowledge work: transactional and transformational solutions. Organ Dyn 39(2):126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz I (2009) Liberating leadership: how the initiative-freeing radical organizational form has been successfully adopted. Calif Manag Rev 51:32–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Empson L (2003) The professional partnership: relic of exemplary form of governance? Organ Stud 24:909–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Deephouse D, Xiao Li S (2007) Ownership and performance of professional service firms. Organ Stud 28:219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüther O, Krücken G (2011) Wissenschaftliche Karriere und Beschäftigungsbedingungen (Employment conditions and career perspectives). Soziale Welt 62:305–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüther O, Krücken G (2015) Incentives and power: an organizational perspective. In: Welpe IM, Wollersheim J, Ringelhan S, Osterloh M (eds) Incentives and performance – governance of research organizations. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Inauen E, Rost K, Osterloh M, Frey BS (2010) Back to the future – a monastic perspective on corporate governance. Manag Rev 21:38–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam A (2011) What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘gold’, ‘ribbon’, or ‘puzzle’? Res Policy 40:1354–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam A (2015) Academic scientists and knowledge commercialization: self-determination and diverse motivations. In: Welpe IM, Wollersheim J, Ringelhan S, Osterloh M (eds) Incentives and performance - governance of research organizations. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Matiaske W, Weller I (2003) Extra-Rollenverhalten. In: Martin A (ed) Organizational behaviour – Verhalten in Organisationen. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 95–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JP, Allen NJ (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resour Manag Rev 1:61–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1989) Mintzberg on management: inside our strange world of organizations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses I, Ramsden P (1992) Academic values and academic practice in the new universities. High Educ Res Dev 11(2):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselin C (2006) Are universities specific organisations? In: Krücken G, Kosmützky A, Torka M (eds) Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions transcript, Bielefeld, pp 34–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh M, Frey BS (2013) Motivation governance. In: Grandori A (ed) Handbook of economic organization. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier LG, Seguin-Lévesqui C, Legault L (2002) Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. J Educ Psychol 94:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J, Deci EL, Ryan RM (2004) Self-determination theory: a dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In: Van Etten S, Pressley M (eds) Big theories revisited. Information Age, Greenwich, pp 31–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000a) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000b) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2006) Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? J Pers 74:1557–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck WH (1992) Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J Manag Stud 29:713–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell K, Prosser M (2004) Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educ Psychol Rev 16(4):409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF (1992) The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivation in education. Educ Psychol Meas 52:1003–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Thiel S, Leeuw FL (2002) The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Perform Manag Rev 25:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann U (2012) Auf dem Weg vom Gelehrten zum abhängig Beschäftigten? Zwei deutschlandweite Surveys zur Lehrmotivation von Professoren. In: Wilkesmann U, Schmid CJ (eds) Hochschule als organisation. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 363–381

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann U (2013) Effects of transactional and transformational governance on academic teaching – empirical evidence from two types of higher education institutions. Tert Educ Manag 19(4):281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann U, Schmid CJ (2012) The impacts of new governance on teaching at German universities. Findings from a national survey in Germany. High Educ 63:33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann U, Schmid CJ (2014) Intrinsic and internalized modes of teaching motivation. Evidence Based HRM 2(1):6–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann U, Wilkesmann M, Virgillito A (2009) The absence of cooperation is not necessarily defection: structural and motivational constraints of knowledge transfer in a social dilemma situation. Organ Stud 30(10):114–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann U, Blutner D, Müller C (2011) German football: organizing for the European top. In: Gammelsaeter H, Senaux B (eds) The organisation and governance of top football across Europe. Routledge, New York, pp 138–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Higher Education, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany

    Uwe Wilkesmann

Authors
  1. Uwe Wilkesmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Wilkesmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Isabell M. Welpe

  2. TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Jutta Wollersheim

  3. TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Stefanie Ringelhan

  4. Zeppelin University, Friedrichshafen, Germany, and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Margit Osterloh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilkesmann, U. (2015). Imaginary Contradictions of University Governance. In: Welpe, I., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S., Osterloh, M. (eds) Incentives and Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation