Skip to main content

Classifying Data Quality Problems in Asset Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Asset Management - Systems, Professional Practices and Certification

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Making sound asset management decisions, such as whether to replace or maintain an ageing underground water pipe, are critical to ensure that organisations maximise the performance of their assets. These decisions are only as good as the data that supports them, and hence many asset management organisations are in desperate need to improve the quality of their data. This chapter reviews the key academic research on data quality (DQ) and Information Quality (IQ) (used interchangeably in this chapter) in asset management, combines this with the current DQ problems faced by asset management organisations in various business sectors, and presents a classification of the most important DQ problems that need to be tackled by asset management organisations. In this research, eleven semi-structured interviews were carried out with asset management professionals in a range of business sectors in the UK. The problems described in the academic literature were cross checked against the problems found in industry. In order to support asset management professionals in solving these problems, we categorised them into seven different DQ dimensions, used in the academic literature, so that it is clear how these problems fit within the standard frameworks for assessing and improving data quality. Asset management professionals can therefore now use these frameworks to underpin their DQ improvement initiatives while focussing on the most critical DQ problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ballou DP, Pazer HL (1985) Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems. Manag Sci 31(2):150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bardaki C, Pramatari K (2007) Assessing information quality in a RFID-integrated shelf replenishment decision support system for the retail industry. In: 12th international conference on information quality, p 302

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batini C et al (2009) Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput Surv 41(3). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-70349690001&partnerID=40. Accessed December 17, 2009

  4. Bovee M, Srivastava RP, Mak B (2003) A conceptual framework and belief-function approach to assessing overall information quality. Int J Intell Syst 18(1):51–74

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao J, Baskarada S, Koronios A (2006) Agile maturity model approach to assessing and enhancing the quality of asset information in engineering asset management information systems. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on business information systems (BIS 2006), pp 486–500

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao J, Lin S, Koronios A (2006) Data quality in engineering asset management organisations—current picture in Australia. In: The 2006 international conference on information quality, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hegazy T et al (2008) Ultra mobile computer system for accurate and speedy inspection of buildings. Annual conference - canadian society for civil engineering, In proceedings, pp 456–464

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill G, Price R, Shanks G (2004) A semiotic information quality framework: applications and experiments. proceedings of the IFIP international conference on decision support systems (DSS 2004): Decision Support in an Uncertain and Complex World. Prato, Italy, pp 658–672

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hodkiewicz M et al (2006) A framework to assess data quality for reliability variables. Gold Coast, Austrialia, In Proceedings of the world congress on engineering asset management (WCEAM)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kahn BK, Strong DM, Wang RY (2002) Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Commun ACM 45(4):184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelepouris T, McFarlane D, Parlikad A (2007) Developing a model for quantifying the quality and value of tracking information on supply chain decisions. In proceedings of the 12th international conference on information quality (ICIQ-07), Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koronios A, Lin S, Gao J (2005) A data quality model for asset management in engineering organisations. In proceedings of the 10th international conference on information quality (ICIQ 2005) pp 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lima LF, Macada AC, Koufteros X (2007) A model for information quality in the banking industry—the case of the public banks in Brazil. In: The 12th international conference on information quality

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin S et al (2007) Developing a data quality framework for asset management in engineering organisations. Int J Inf Qual 1(1):100–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy GD (2009) Improving the quality of manually acquired data: applying the theory of planned behaviour to data quality. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 94(12):1881–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ouertani MZ, Parlikad AK, McFarlane D (2008) Asset information management: research challenges. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on research challenges in information science, RCIS 2008, pp 361–370. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-57349094377&partnerID=40

  17. Pipino LL, Lee YW, Wang RY (2002) Data quality assessment. Commun ACM 45(4):211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soma R, Bakshi A, Prasanna V (2007) An architecture of a workflow system for Integrated Asset Management in the smart oil field domain. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE congress on services, services 2007. pp 191–198. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-46849085383&partnerID=40

  19. Stvilia B et al (2007) A framework for information quality assessment. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 58(12):1720–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wand Y, Wang RY (1996) Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Commun ACM 39(11) pp:86–95

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang RY, Storey VC, Firth CP (1995) A framework for analysis of data quality research. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 7(4):623–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Woodall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Woodall, P., Gao, J., Parlikad, A., Koronios, A. (2015). Classifying Data Quality Problems in Asset Management. In: Tse, P., Mathew, J., Wong, K., Lam, R., Ko, C. (eds) Engineering Asset Management - Systems, Professional Practices and Certification. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09507-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09507-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09506-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09507-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics