Skip to main content

Developing Social Leadership: Cultural and Technological Influences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
From Information to Smart Society

Abstract

The development of social leadership is triggered by the adoption of social media for internal purposes by organizations. It involves dynamics of collaborative and mutual influence between leaders and followers, and among followers themselves, mediated by social media. The aim of this paper is to analyze individual attitudes to social leadership as a function of cultural and technological factors. Using data collected from a sample (Nā€‰=ā€‰178) of employees, we developed and adapted multiple item scales from a wide range of sources in the literature to assess organizational culture, information technology and social media adoption, in addition to other individual and organizational variables. Regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between these variables. What emerged was a three-dimensional model of social leadership as a positive attitude towards: shared responsibility, social media usage and direction. In particular, organizational culture strongly influenced two of these three dimensions, while the use of social media for personal purposes predicted attitudes to the use of social media in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ghiringhelli, C., Lazazzara, A.: Social leadership. Come i social media cambiano il modello di leadership nelle organizzazioni, Bicocca Training & Development Centre, UniversitĆ  degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milano (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5, 132 (1994)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S.: Adding the ā€œeā€ to e-leadership: how it may impact your leadership. Organ. Dyn. 31(4), 325ā€“338 (2003)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Quinn, R.E., Kimberly, J.R.: Paradox, planning and perseverance: guidelines for managerial practice. In: Kimberly, J.R., Quinn, R.E. (eds.) Managing Organizational Transitions, pp. 295ā€“313. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood (1984)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Denison, D.R., Spreitzer, G.M.: Organizational culture and organizational development: a competing values approach. Res. Organ. Change Dev. 5, 1ā€“21 (1991)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Albadvi, A., Keramati, A., Razmi, J.: Assessing the impact of information technology on firm performance considering the role of intervening variables: organizational infrastructures and business processes reengineering. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(12), 2697ā€“2734 (2007)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S., Dodge, G.E.: E-leadership: implication for theory, research, and practice. Leadersh. Q. 11(4), 615ā€“668 (2000)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H., Salas, E.: Virtual teams: effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dyn. 7(4), 297ā€“323 (2003)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Thompson, L.F., Coovert, M.D.: Teamwork online: the effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and post discussion accuracy. Group Dyn. 7, 135ā€“151 (2003)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Zigurs, I.: Leadership in virtual teams: oxymoron or opportunity? Organ. Dyn. 31(4), 339ā€“351 (2003)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Bell, B.S.: Work groups and teams in organizations. In: Borman, W.C., Ilgen, D.R., Klimoski, R.J. (eds.) Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Handbook of Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 333ā€“375. Wiley, New York (2003)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Stewart, G.L., Manz, C.C.: Leadership for self-managing work teams: a typology and integrative model. Hum. Relat. 48(7), 747ā€“770 (1995)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Oā€™Toole, J., Galbraith, J., Lawler, E.E.: When two (or more) heads are better than one: the promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. Calif. Manag. Rev. 44(4), 65ā€“83 (2002)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Pearce, C.L., Conger, J.A.: All those years ago: the historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In: Pearce, C.L., Conger, J.A. (eds.) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, pp. 1ā€“18. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Day, D.V., Gronn, P., Salas, E.: Leadership capacity in teams. Leadersh. Q. 15, 857ā€“880 (2004)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Grint, K.: The sacred in leadership: separation, sacrifice and silence. Organ. Stud. 31(89), 89ā€“107 (2010)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Oā€™Connor, P.M.G., Quinn, L.: Organizational capacity for leadership. In: McCauley, C.D., Van Velsor, E. (eds.) The Center for Creative Leadership Handbook of Leadership Development, 2nd edn, pp. 417ā€“437. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Pearce, C.L.: The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Acad. Manag. Exec. 18(1), 47ā€“57 (2004)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Goffee, R., Jones, G.: What holds the modern company together? Harv. Bus. Rev. 74(6), 133ā€“149 (1996)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Davison, R., Martinsons, M.: Guest editorial cultural issues and IT management: past and present. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 50(1), 3ā€“7 (2003)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Jackson, S.: Organizational culture and information systems adoption: a three-perspective approach. Inf. Organ. 21, 57ā€“83 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Kedia, B.L., Bhagat, R.S.: Cultural constraints on the transfer of technology across nations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 13(4), 559ā€“571 (1988)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Leidner, D.E., Kayworth, T.: A review of culture in information systems researches: toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Q. 30(2), 357ā€“399 (2006)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R.: Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Internet High. Educ. 11, 71ā€“80 (2008)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, K.J.: Innovation characteristics and innovation adoptionā€“implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 29(1), 28ā€“45 (1982)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Quinn, R.E., Spreitzer, G.M.: The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. Res. Organ. Change Dev. 5, 115ā€“142 (1991)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Kaiser, H.F.: The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 141ā€“51 (1960)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Cattell, R.B.: The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1(2), 245ā€“76 (1966)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Everaert, H.A.: Measuring challenging student behavior. An overview of methodological properties and decisions. Hogeschool Utrecht, kenniskring Gedragsproblemen in de Onderwijspraktijk, KG-publicatie nr. 17 (2007)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Inglehart, R.: Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319ā€“339 (1989)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Kitchell, S.: Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovative adoption: a qualitative/quantitative approach. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 23(3), 195ā€“205 (1995)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Staples, D.S.: Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(1), 151ā€“183 (2001)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Thibaut, J.W., Kelley, H.H.: The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper stems from an idea originally developed within the Bicocca Training & Development Centre of the University of Milano-Bicocca.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Lazazzara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix (Tables 6, 7, and 8)

Appendix (Tables 6, 7, and 8)

Table 6 Items wording from competing values culture instrument
Table 7 Items wording for the extent of IT usage
Table 8 Items wording for the extent of social media usage

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lazazzara, A., Ghiringhelli, C. (2015). Developing Social Leadership: Cultural and Technological Influences. In: Mola, L., Pennarola, F., Za, S. (eds) From Information to Smart Society. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09450-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics