Abstract
The development of social leadership is triggered by the adoption of social media for internal purposes by organizations. It involves dynamics of collaborative and mutual influence between leaders and followers, and among followers themselves, mediated by social media. The aim of this paper is to analyze individual attitudes to social leadership as a function of cultural and technological factors. Using data collected from a sample (Nā=ā178) of employees, we developed and adapted multiple item scales from a wide range of sources in the literature to assess organizational culture, information technology and social media adoption, in addition to other individual and organizational variables. Regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between these variables. What emerged was a three-dimensional model of social leadership as a positive attitude towards: shared responsibility, social media usage and direction. In particular, organizational culture strongly influenced two of these three dimensions, while the use of social media for personal purposes predicted attitudes to the use of social media in organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ghiringhelli, C., Lazazzara, A.: Social leadership. Come i social media cambiano il modello di leadership nelle organizzazioni, Bicocca Training & Development Centre, UniversitĆ degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milano (2013)
DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5, 132 (1994)
Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S.: Adding the āeā to e-leadership: how it may impact your leadership. Organ. Dyn. 31(4), 325ā338 (2003)
Quinn, R.E., Kimberly, J.R.: Paradox, planning and perseverance: guidelines for managerial practice. In: Kimberly, J.R., Quinn, R.E. (eds.) Managing Organizational Transitions, pp. 295ā313. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood (1984)
Denison, D.R., Spreitzer, G.M.: Organizational culture and organizational development: a competing values approach. Res. Organ. Change Dev. 5, 1ā21 (1991)
Albadvi, A., Keramati, A., Razmi, J.: Assessing the impact of information technology on firm performance considering the role of intervening variables: organizational infrastructures and business processes reengineering. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(12), 2697ā2734 (2007)
Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S., Dodge, G.E.: E-leadership: implication for theory, research, and practice. Leadersh. Q. 11(4), 615ā668 (2000)
Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H., Salas, E.: Virtual teams: effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dyn. 7(4), 297ā323 (2003)
Thompson, L.F., Coovert, M.D.: Teamwork online: the effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and post discussion accuracy. Group Dyn. 7, 135ā151 (2003)
Zigurs, I.: Leadership in virtual teams: oxymoron or opportunity? Organ. Dyn. 31(4), 339ā351 (2003)
Kozlowski, S.W.J., Bell, B.S.: Work groups and teams in organizations. In: Borman, W.C., Ilgen, D.R., Klimoski, R.J. (eds.) Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Handbook of Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 333ā375. Wiley, New York (2003)
Stewart, G.L., Manz, C.C.: Leadership for self-managing work teams: a typology and integrative model. Hum. Relat. 48(7), 747ā770 (1995)
OāToole, J., Galbraith, J., Lawler, E.E.: When two (or more) heads are better than one: the promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. Calif. Manag. Rev. 44(4), 65ā83 (2002)
Pearce, C.L., Conger, J.A.: All those years ago: the historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In: Pearce, C.L., Conger, J.A. (eds.) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, pp. 1ā18. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Day, D.V., Gronn, P., Salas, E.: Leadership capacity in teams. Leadersh. Q. 15, 857ā880 (2004)
Grint, K.: The sacred in leadership: separation, sacrifice and silence. Organ. Stud. 31(89), 89ā107 (2010)
OāConnor, P.M.G., Quinn, L.: Organizational capacity for leadership. In: McCauley, C.D., Van Velsor, E. (eds.) The Center for Creative Leadership Handbook of Leadership Development, 2nd edn, pp. 417ā437. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2004)
Pearce, C.L.: The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Acad. Manag. Exec. 18(1), 47ā57 (2004)
Goffee, R., Jones, G.: What holds the modern company together? Harv. Bus. Rev. 74(6), 133ā149 (1996)
Davison, R., Martinsons, M.: Guest editorial cultural issues and IT management: past and present. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 50(1), 3ā7 (2003)
Jackson, S.: Organizational culture and information systems adoption: a three-perspective approach. Inf. Organ. 21, 57ā83 (2011)
Kedia, B.L., Bhagat, R.S.: Cultural constraints on the transfer of technology across nations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 13(4), 559ā571 (1988)
Leidner, D.E., Kayworth, T.: A review of culture in information systems researches: toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Q. 30(2), 357ā399 (2006)
Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R.: Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Internet High. Educ. 11, 71ā80 (2008)
Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, K.J.: Innovation characteristics and innovation adoptionāimplementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 29(1), 28ā45 (1982)
Quinn, R.E., Spreitzer, G.M.: The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. Res. Organ. Change Dev. 5, 115ā142 (1991)
Kaiser, H.F.: The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 141ā51 (1960)
Cattell, R.B.: The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1(2), 245ā76 (1966)
Everaert, H.A.: Measuring challenging student behavior. An overview of methodological properties and decisions. Hogeschool Utrecht, kenniskring Gedragsproblemen in de Onderwijspraktijk, KG-publicatie nr. 17 (2007)
Inglehart, R.: Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)
Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319ā339 (1989)
Kitchell, S.: Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovative adoption: a qualitative/quantitative approach. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 23(3), 195ā205 (1995)
Jarvenpaa, S.L., Staples, D.S.: Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(1), 151ā183 (2001)
Thibaut, J.W., Kelley, H.H.: The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley, New York (1959)
Acknowledgments
This paper stems from an idea originally developed within the Bicocca Training & Development Centre of the University of Milano-Bicocca.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix (Tables 6, 7, and 8)
Appendix (Tables 6, 7, and 8)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lazazzara, A., Ghiringhelli, C. (2015). Developing Social Leadership: Cultural and Technological Influences. In: Mola, L., Pennarola, F., Za, S. (eds) From Information to Smart Society. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09450-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09450-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09449-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09450-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)