Abstract
High local recurrence rates were a major problem in rectal cancer treatment, with between 30 and 50 % of patients affected, resulting in a very poor quality of life and short survival of patients with rectal cancer. In recent years, prognosis of rectal cancer has markedly improved, due to innovations in surgical treatment in combination with neoadjuvant therapy. Quality evaluation of surgical procedures has become the standard; constant high quality of surgery is one of the major successes in rectal cancer over the last decade. Continuous monitoring of surgical procedures is a new role for the pathologist. Completeness of excision, resection margins, but also numbers of lymph nodes have been firmly established as quality indicators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benson AB 3rd, Ajani JA et al (2004) Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 22(14):2918–2926
Birbeck KF, Macklin CP et al (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 235(4):449–457
Bosch SL, Nagtegaal ID (2012) The importance of the pathologist’s role in assessment of the quality of the mesorectum. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 8(2):90–98
Bujko K, Rutkowski A et al (2012) Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 19(3):801–808
Goldstein NS, Soman A et al (1999) Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. Anat Pathol 111:349–351
Gooiker GA, Kolfschoten NE et al (2013) Evaluating the validity of quality indicators for colorectal cancer care. J Surg Oncol 108(7):465–471
Gosens MJ, van Krieken JH et al (2007) Improvement of staging by combining tumor and treatment parameters: the value for prognostication in rectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(8):997–1003
Mekenkamp LJ, van Krieken JH et al (2009) Lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer is dependent on many factors—the role of the tumor, the patient, the surgeon, the radiotherapist, and the pathologist. Am J Surg Pathol 33(10):1547–1553
Morikawa E, Yasutomi M et al (1994) Distribution of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer by the modified clearing method. Dis Colon Rectum 37:219–223
Nagtegaal ID, Gosens MJ et al (2007) Combinations of tumor and treatment parameters are more discriminative for prognosis than the present TNM system in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(13):1647–1650
Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA et al (2002a) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26(3):350–357
Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ et al (2002b) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734
Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26(2):303–312
Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ et al (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9257–9264
Quirke P, Steele R et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828
Shirouzu K, Isomoto H et al (1995) Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery. Cancer 76(3):388–392
West NP, Morris EJ et al (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9(9):857–865
Williams NS, Dixon MF et al (1983) Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients’ survival. Br J Surg 70(3):150–154
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bosch, S.L., Nagtegaal, I.D. (2014). What Is “Good Quality” in Rectal Cancer Surgery? The Pathologist’s Perspective. In: Otto, F., Lutz, M. (eds) Early Gastrointestinal Cancers II: Rectal Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 203. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08060-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08060-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08059-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08060-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)