Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Environmental Issues with Temporal Lenses: Issues of Temporality and Individual Differences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application

Abstract

It has now been recognised that environmental issues entail both a social conflict (private vs. public interests) and a temporal conflict (short- vs. long-term interests). Supporting this view, several studies have shown that greater future time perspective is associated with higher pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours. A recent meta-analytical summary of 19 independent samples (comprising more than 6,000 participants from seven countries) published by our research group has shown a medium effect size on the influence between future time perspective and environmental engagement. This chapter will first provide a theoretical summary of the links between time perspective (and in particular future time perspective) and environmental issues. This chapter will then review studies examining associations between future time perspective and environmental engagement at the individual and societal level. Implications and future directions for research in the area will also be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnocky, S., Milfont, T. L., & Nicol, J. (2014). Time perspective and sustainable behaviour: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behavior, 46, 556–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. A. (1990). Models of psychological time. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W., Colman, R., Haywood, J., Manning, M. R., & Mote, P. (2007). The physical science behind climate change. Scientific American, 297, 64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (2006). Sustainability, future orientation and water conservation. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarque, C., Apostolidis, T., & Joule, R. V. (2012). Does binding communication increase consideration of future consequences and decision making facing a pro-environmental behavior? In S. Kabisch, A. Kunath, P. Schweizer-Ries, & A. Steinführer (Eds.), Vulnerability, risks, and complexity: Impacts of global change on human habitats (pp. 221–229). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarque, C., Apostolidis, T., & Joule, R. V. (2013). Consideration of future consequences and pro-environmental decision making in the context of persuasion and binding commitment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, N. (Ed.). (2003). A sociocognitive approach to social norms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebreo, A., & Vining, J. (2001). How similar are recycling and waste reduction? Future orientation and reasons for reducing waste as predictors of self-reported behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 424–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L., Milfont, T. L., & Lawrence, J. (2014). Considering local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate. Global Environmental Change, 25, 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 35–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., Tost, L. P., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (2010). The legacy motive: A catalyst for sustainable decision making in organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 153–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guignard, S., Apostolidis, T., & Demarque, C. (2014). Discussing normative features of future time perspective construct: Renewing with the Lewinian approach from a sociocognitive perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Fong, G. T. (2003). The effects of a brief time perspective intervention for increasing physical activity among young adults. Psychology and Health, 18, 685–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joireman, J. A. (2005). Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time (pp. 289–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1272–1287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681–1685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2006). Time, uncertainty, and individual differences in decisions to cooperate in resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 603–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasane, T. P., & O’Donnell, D. A. (2005). Time orientation measurement: A conceptual approach. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time (pp. 11–30). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201–1205.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of recycling behavior: An application of a modified health belief model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1799–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L. (2010). Global warming, climate change and human psychology. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. H. García-Cadena, & M. Frías-Arment (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in theory, research and practice (pp. 19–42). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., & Gouveia, V. V. (2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., & Schwarzenthal, M. (2014). Explaining why larks are future-oriented and owls are present-oriented: Self-control mediates the chronotype-time perspective relationships. Chronobiology International, 31, 581–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Exploring the concept of environmental generativity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., Abrahamse, W., & McCarthy, N. (2011). Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., Harré, N., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2012a). The climate change dilemma: Examining the association between parental status and political party support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2386–2410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. K. C. (2012b). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, G. (2009). Psychologie environnementale: Les relations homme-environnement [Environmental psychology: Man-environment relations]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeijer, D., & de Groot, R. S. (2008). Framing environmental indicators: Moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowack, K., Milfont, T. L., & van der Meer, E. (2013). Future versus present: Time perspective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 173–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, S., & Bauer, J. (2011). Overcoming the distance: Perspective taking with future humans improves environmental engagement. Environment and Behaviour, 20, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlik, K. (1991). The psychology of global environmental change: Some basic data and an agenda for cooperative international research. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist, 28, 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinovich, A., Morton, T., & Postmes, T. (2010). Time perspective and attitude-behaviour consistency in future-oriented behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Milfont, T. L., Chance, R. C., Tronu, G., Luís, S., Ando, K., et al. (2014). Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 46, 267–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957–972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2005). Understanding individuals’ environmentally significant behavior. Environmental Law Reporter, 35(11), 785–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2011). Construal level theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume One (pp. 118–134). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A., & Joireman, J. A. (2008). How we can promote behavior that serves all of us in the future. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2, 127–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Tost, L. P., Hernandez, M., & Larrick, R. P. (2012). It’s only a matter of time: Intergenerational beneficence as a death anxiety buffer. Psychological Science, 23, 704–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology and Centre for Applied Cross-Cultural Research, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Taciano L. Milfont

  2. Department of Social, Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Toulouse Le Mirail, Toulouse, France

    Christophe Demarque

Authors
  1. Taciano L. Milfont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christophe Demarque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taciano L. Milfont .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Maciej Stolarski

  2. Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale, Institut de Psychologie, University of Lyon, Lyon-Bron, France

    Nicolas Fieulaine

  3. GGZ Veenendaal, Veenendaal, The Netherlands

    Wessel van Beek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milfont, T.L., Demarque, C. (2015). Understanding Environmental Issues with Temporal Lenses: Issues of Temporality and Individual Differences. In: Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., van Beek, W. (eds) Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation