Skip to main content

Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Comparative Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Education Research

Part of the book series: CERC Studies in Comparative Education ((CERC,volume 19))

Abstract

Among the many approaches to research, a broad classification distinguishes between the quantitative and the qualitative. Boundaries may be difficult to determine, and the approaches may not be mutually exclusive. Nevertheless, the two approaches deserve focus because they permit different types of insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikman, Sheila (2001): ‘Literacies, Languages and Developments in Peruvian Amazonia’, in Street, Brian V. (ed.), Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp.103-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ary, Donald; Jacobs, Lucy Cheser & Sorensen, Chris (2010): Introduction to Research in Education. 8th edition, Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Julia (2003): ‘Literacies and Livelihood Strategies: Experience from Usulután, El Salvador’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.23, No.3, pp.291-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe, Caroline H. & Robey, Kenneth M. (1993): ‘Arabic Literacy and Secrecy among the Mende of Sierra Leone’, in Street, Brian (ed.), Cross-cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.110-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, Julia (2005): ‘Mixing Methods: The Entry of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches into the Research Process’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol.8, No.3, pp.173-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, Mark & Thomas, R. Murray (1995): ‘Levels of Comparison in Educational Studies: Different Insights from Different Literatures and the Value of Multilevel Analyses’. Harvard Educational Review, Vol.65, No.3, pp.472-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, Alan (1988): Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, Michael & Watson, Keith (2003): Comparative and International Research in Education: Globalisation, Context and Difference. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darcovich, Nancy (2000): ‘The Measurement of Adult Literacy in Theory and in Practice’. International Review of Education, Vol.46, No.5, pp. 367-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, Emily R., LeVine, Sarah E. & Velasco, Patricia M. (1998): ‘Maternal Schooling and Health-Related Language and Literacy Skills in Rural Mexico’. Comparative Education Review, Vol.42, No.2, pp.139-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoğlu, A.Y.; Öney, B. & Kuşcul, H. (2003): ‘Development and Evaluation of an Adult Literacy Program in Turkey’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.23, No.1, pp.17-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Caroline & Choksi, Archana (2001): ‘Literacy, Schooling and Development: Views of Rabari Nomads, India’, in Street, Brian V. (ed.), Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp.27-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elley, Warwick B. (1994): ‘Conclusions’, in Elley, Warwick B. (ed.), The IEA Study of Reading Literacy: Achievement and Instruction in Thirty-two School Systems. Oxford: Pergamon, pp.223-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzaki, Abdelkader; Spratt, Jennifer E. & Wagner, Daniel A. (1999): ‘Childhood Literacy Acquisition in Rural Morocco: Effects of Language Differences and Quranic Preschooling’, in Wagner, Daniel A. (ed.), The Future of Literacy in a Changing World. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, pp.183-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Bruce; Edwards, John H.Y. & Gorman, Kathleen (1999): ‘Does Rising Literacy Spark Economic Growth? Commercial Expansion in Mexico’, in Wagner, Daniel A. (ed.), The Future of Literacy in a Changing World. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, pp.373-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Bruce, Hua, Haiyan & Snyder, Conrad W. (1994): ‘When Girls Learn More Than Boys: The Influence of Time in School and Pedagogy in Botswana’. Comparative Education Review, Vol.38, No.3, pp. 347-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, Stephen & Taylor, Chris (2004): Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer C. (2007): Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, Egon G. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (1994): ‘Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research’, in Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, pp.105-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, Chandra (1997): ‘Problems of Illiteracy in a Literate Developing Society: Sri Lanka’. International Review of Education, Vol.43, No.5-6, pp.595-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartas, Dimitra (ed.) (2010): Educational Research and Inquiry: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Kenneth R. (2003): Closing Methodological Divides: Toward Democratic Educational Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Zellyne (2000): ‘Functional Literacy of Young Guyanese Adults’. International Review of Education, Vol.46, No.1-2, pp.93-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulick, Don & Stroud, Christopher (1993): ‘Conceptions and Uses of Literacy in a Papua New Guinean Village’, in Street, Brian (ed.), CrossCultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, pp.30-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, Victor & Spratt, Jennie (1997): ‘Patterns of Incidence and Change in Moroccan Literacy’. Comparative Education Review, Vol.41, No.2, pp. 120-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, Bryan (2005): ‘Assessing the Impact of Women’s Literacies in Bangladesh: An Ethnographic Inquiry’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.25, No.2, pp.123-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangubhai, Francis (1999): ‘Literacy in the South Pacific: Some Multilingual and Multiethnic Issues’, in Wagner, Daniel A. (ed.), The Future of Literacy in a Changing World. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, pp.213-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Tim (2011): Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mpofu, Stanley T. & Youngman, Frank (2001): ‘The Dominant Tradition in Adult Literacy: A Comparative Study of National Literacy Programmes in Botswana and Zimbabwe’. International Review of Education, Vol.47, No.6, pp.573-595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, Ina V.S.; Martin, Michael O.; Gonzalez, Eugenio J. & Kennedy, Ann M. (2003): PIRLS 2001 International Report: IEA’s Study of Reading Literacy Achievement in Primary School in 35 Countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, Ina V.S.; Martin, Michael O.; Kennedy, Ann M.; Trong, Kathleen L.; & Sainsbury, Marian (2009): PIRLS 2011 Assessment Framework. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, Karen (1993): ‘Toward a Critical Analysis of Literacy in Southern Africa’. Comparative Education Review, Vol.37, No.4, pp.389-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. & Leech, Nancy L. (2005): ‘On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol.8, No.5, pp.375-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papen, Uta (2001): ‘“Literacy – Your Key to a Better Future”? Literacy, Reconciliation and Development in the National Literacy Programme in Namibia’, in Street, Brian V. (ed.), Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp.40-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciano, Anthony G. (2004): Educational Research Primer. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchner, L. (2003): ‘Women and Literacy in Rural Mali: A Study of the Socio-economic Impact of Participating in Literacy Programs in Four Villages’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.23, No.4, pp.439-458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, Stephen & Wikelund, Karen Reed (1993): ‘Literacy Development and Ethnicity: An Alaskan Example’, in Street, Brian (ed.), Cross- Cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.176-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-Pant, Anna (2000): ‘Women and Literacy: A Nepal Perspective’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.20, No.4, pp.349-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-Pant, Anna (2001): ‘Women's Literacy and Health: Can an Ethnographic Researcher Find the Links?’, in Street, Brian V. (ed.), Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp.152-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockhill, Kathleen (1993): ‘Gender, Language, and the Politics of Literacy’, in Street, Brian (ed.), Cross-Cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.156-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, Julie (2005): ‘Subjective and Objective Measures of Literacy: Implications for Current Results-oriented Development Initiatives’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.25, No.6, pp.652-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell-Anzola, Beatrice; Rowe, Meredith L. & LeVine, Robert A. (2005): ‘Literacy as a Pathway Between Schooling and Health-related Communication Skills: A Study of Venezuelan Mothers’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.25, No.1, pp.19-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver, Fons & Leung, Kwok (1997): Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein-Shr, Gail (1993): ‘Literacy and Social Practice: A Community in Transition’, in Street, Brian (ed.), Cross-cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.272-293.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fairbrother, G.P. (2014). Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Comparative Education. In: Bray, M., Adamson, B., Mason, M. (eds) Comparative Education Research. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05594-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics