Skip to main content

Developing Media Production Skills for Literacy in a Primary School Classroom: Digital Materials, Embodied Knowledge and Material Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Literacy in the Arts

Abstract

This chapter investigates the relationship between technical and operational skills and the development of conceptual knowledge and literacy in media arts learning. It argues that there is a relationship between the stories, expressions and ideas that students aim to produce with communications media, and their ability to realise these in material form through technical processes in specific material contexts. Our claim is that there is a relationship between the technical and the operational, along with material relations and the development of conceptual knowledge and literacy in media arts learning. We place more emphasis on the material aspects of literacy than is usually the case in socio-cultural accounts of media literacy. We provide examples from a current project to demonstrate that it is just as important to address the material as it is the discursive and conceptual when considering how students develop media literacy in classroom spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This data was collected as part of an Australian Research Council Linkage project entitled the URLearning project. We thank the ARC for their support of the research. The project was a collaboration between researchers at QUT, the teachers’ union and the school in which the project was located. We thank the children, teachers, leaders and community of the school who are our research partners. All participants have provided consent and where appropriate images have been blurred for anonymity reasons. Our research colleagues on this project include Allan Luke, Amanda Levido, Karen Dooley, Beryl Exley, Vinesh Chandra, Katherine Doyle, Kathy Mills, and John Davis from QUT and John McCollow and Lesley McFarlane from the QTU.

  2. 2.

    In Australia Year Four is in the middle primary years and caters to children aged 8 and 9.

References

  • Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, K. M., & Bandy, E. A. (2010). Digital pathways to learning through collaborative media production. In K. Tyner (Ed.), Media literacy: New agendas in communication (pp. 28–50). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., Willett, R., & Pini, M. (2011). Home truths?: Video production and domestic life. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2003). Analysing media texts. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezuanni, M. L. (2011). Youth media production and technology skills acquisition: Opportunities for agency. In J. Fisherkeller (Ed.), International perspectives on youth media: Cultures of production and education (pp. 121–137). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezuanni, M. L. (2014). The building blocks of digital media literacy: Socio-material practice and the production of knowledge in formal schooling. (Manuscript submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezuanni, M. L., & Woods, A. (2013). ‘These are my photos of when I was little’: Locating media arts in the primary school curriculum. In P. Fraser & J. Wardle (Eds.), Current perspectives in media education: A manifesto for media education (pp. 71–90). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., & de Lange, T. (2007). Re-mixing multimodal resources: Multiliteracies and digital production in Norwegian media education. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisherkeller, J. (2011). Introduction. In J. Fisherkeller (Ed.), International perspectives on youth media: Cultures of production and education (pp. 1–21). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). The means of correct training. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M. (2005/2007). Media ecologies: Materialist energies in art and technoculture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilje, O. (2011). Working in tandem with editing tools: Iterative meaning-making in filmmaking practices. Visual Communication, 10(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2009). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1992). The body literate: Discourse and inscription in early literacy training. Linguistics and Education, 4(1), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003). Literacy education for a new ethics of global community. Language Arts, 81(1), 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997). The social practices of reading. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 185–226). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Woods, A., & Dooley, K. (2011). Comprehension as social and intellectual practice: Rebuilding curriculum in low socio-economic and cultural minority schools. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 60–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, J. (2009). Media literacy is elementary: Teaching youth to critically read and create media. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2). Online journal at http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Dezuanni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dezuanni, M., Woods, A. (2014). Developing Media Production Skills for Literacy in a Primary School Classroom: Digital Materials, Embodied Knowledge and Material Contexts. In: Barton, G. (eds) Literacy in the Arts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04846-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics