Abstract
This chapter investigates the relationship between technical and operational skills and the development of conceptual knowledge and literacy in media arts learning. It argues that there is a relationship between the stories, expressions and ideas that students aim to produce with communications media, and their ability to realise these in material form through technical processes in specific material contexts. Our claim is that there is a relationship between the technical and the operational, along with material relations and the development of conceptual knowledge and literacy in media arts learning. We place more emphasis on the material aspects of literacy than is usually the case in socio-cultural accounts of media literacy. We provide examples from a current project to demonstrate that it is just as important to address the material as it is the discursive and conceptual when considering how students develop media literacy in classroom spaces.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This data was collected as part of an Australian Research Council Linkage project entitled the URLearning project. We thank the ARC for their support of the research. The project was a collaboration between researchers at QUT, the teachers’ union and the school in which the project was located. We thank the children, teachers, leaders and community of the school who are our research partners. All participants have provided consent and where appropriate images have been blurred for anonymity reasons. Our research colleagues on this project include Allan Luke, Amanda Levido, Karen Dooley, Beryl Exley, Vinesh Chandra, Katherine Doyle, Kathy Mills, and John Davis from QUT and John McCollow and Lesley McFarlane from the QTU.
- 2.
In Australia Year Four is in the middle primary years and caters to children aged 8 and 9.
References
Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London/New York: Routledge.
Bass, K. M., & Bandy, E. A. (2010). Digital pathways to learning through collaborative media production. In K. Tyner (Ed.), Media literacy: New agendas in communication (pp. 28–50). New York: Routledge.
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Buckingham, D., Willett, R., & Pini, M. (2011). Home truths?: Video production and domestic life. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2003). Analysing media texts. London: Continuum.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Dezuanni, M. L. (2011). Youth media production and technology skills acquisition: Opportunities for agency. In J. Fisherkeller (Ed.), International perspectives on youth media: Cultures of production and education (pp. 121–137). New York: Peter Lang.
Dezuanni, M. L. (2014). The building blocks of digital media literacy: Socio-material practice and the production of knowledge in formal schooling. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
Dezuanni, M. L., & Woods, A. (2013). ‘These are my photos of when I was little’: Locating media arts in the primary school curriculum. In P. Fraser & J. Wardle (Eds.), Current perspectives in media education: A manifesto for media education (pp. 71–90). London: Palgrave.
Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., & de Lange, T. (2007). Re-mixing multimodal resources: Multiliteracies and digital production in Norwegian media education. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 183–198.
Fisherkeller, J. (2011). Introduction. In J. Fisherkeller (Ed.), International perspectives on youth media: Cultures of production and education (pp. 1–21). New York: Peter Lang.
Foucault, M. (1984). The means of correct training. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Fuller, M. (2005/2007). Media ecologies: Materialist energies in art and technoculture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gilje, O. (2011). Working in tandem with editing tools: Iterative meaning-making in filmmaking practices. Visual Communication, 10(1), 45–62.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jewitt, C. (2009). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. New York: Routledge.
Luke, A. (1992). The body literate: Discourse and inscription in early literacy training. Linguistics and Education, 4(1), 107–129.
Luke, A. (2003). Literacy education for a new ethics of global community. Language Arts, 81(1), 20–22.
Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997). The social practices of reading. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 185–226). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
Luke, A., Woods, A., & Dooley, K. (2011). Comprehension as social and intellectual practice: Rebuilding curriculum in low socio-economic and cultural minority schools. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 157–164.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 60–93.
Share, J. (2009). Media literacy is elementary: Teaching youth to critically read and create media. New York: Peter Lang.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2). Online journal at http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dezuanni, M., Woods, A. (2014). Developing Media Production Skills for Literacy in a Primary School Classroom: Digital Materials, Embodied Knowledge and Material Contexts. In: Barton, G. (eds) Literacy in the Arts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04846-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04846-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04845-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04846-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)