Abstract
This chapter contextualizes the German case, gives a brief history of the German immigration experience in the second half of the twentieth century, and provides a descriptive account on the extent to which immigrants in Germany engage in transnational activities.
The descriptive analyses reveal that the majority of first generation immigrants maintains ties with its country of origin, but the extent depends on the type of activity considered. Regular visits to the country of origin are common, most of them, however, do not exceed periods of 1–3 months and there is no intergenerational decline in visiting. Second generation immigrants visit their (parents’) country of origin as often as first generation immigrants do. Sending remittances, on the other hand, is much less common among first generation immigrants in Germany and is rare among the second generation.
Further descriptive analyses show substantial differences with regard to immigrants’ countries of origins. Those groups which appear most disadvantaged, e.g. immigrants of Turkish descent, are also transnationally most active.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Source: http://factfinder2.census.gov (09.26.2013).
- 2.
We should note that the stream of immigrants from Eastern Europe and the former USSR increased already in the 1980s (for a detailed discussion, see Herbert (2003)).
- 3.
- 4.
This is due to the increasing number of German emigrants. Net migration for non-German citizens is still slightly positive in 2008 (10,685) (BAMF 2010, p. 13).
- 5.
But the data may not be well suited to examine this particular question, as the respondents are asked if they have been to their country of origin in the last 2 years and, if so, for how long. This might result in an underestimation of the incidence of visits, because if several trips have been undertaken only the longest is reported.
- 6.
One might argue that the intention to stay in Germany might be conflated with other aspects than those regarding belonging and emotional attachment. Although this is certainly a valid critique, I would argue that potentially vague return intentions indeed say a lot about feelings of belonging.
References
BAMF. (2010). Migrationsbericht 2008. Nürnberg: Bundesministerium des Inneren (BMI) Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF).
Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
de la Briere, B., Sadoulet, E., de Janvry, A., & Lambert, S. (2002). The roles of destination, gender, and household composition in explaining remittances: An analysis for the Dominican Sierra. Journal of Development Economics, 68(2), 309–328.
Diehl, C., & Schnell, R. (2006). “Reactive ethnicity” or “assimilation”? statements, arguments, and first empirical evidence for labor migrants in Germany. International Migration Review, 40(4), 786–816.
Drever, A. I., & Hoffmeister, O. (2008). Immigrants and social networks in a job-scarce environment: The case of Germany. International Migration Review, 42(2), 425–448.
Esser, H. (2006). Sprache und Integration: Die sozialen Bedingungen und Folgen des Spracherwerbs von Migranten. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
Granovetter, M. (1973). Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Guarnizo, L. E., Portes, A., & Haller, W. J. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1211–1248.
Haller, W., & Landolt, P. (2005). The transnational dimensions of identity formation: Adult children of immigrants in Miami. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(6), 1182–1214.
Herbert, U. (2003). Geschichte der Ausländerpolitik in Deutschland. München: Lizensausgabe für die Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Itzigsohn, J., & Giorguli-Saucedo, S. (2002). Immigrant Incorporation and Sociocultural Transnationalism. International Migration Review, 36(3), 766–798.
Kalter, F. (2005). Spezifisches Kapital und Strukturelle Assimilation. In DGS (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheit - kulturelle Unterschiede’, 32. Kongress der DGS in München, Verhandlungsband (CD-Rom) (pp. 2079–2089). Frankfurt, a.M.: Campus.
Kalter, F. (2006). Auf der Suche nach einer Erklärung für die spezifischen Arbeitsmarktnachteile Jugendlicher türkischer Herkunft. Zugleich eine Replik auf den Beitrag von Holger Seibert und Heike Solga “Gleiche Chancen dank einer abgeschlossenen Ausbildung?”. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 35(2), 144–160.
Kalter, F., & Granato, N. (2002). Demographic change, educational expansion, and structural assimilation of immigrants: The case of Germany. European Sociological Review, 18, 199–216.
Kivisto, P. (2002). Multiculturalism in a Global Society (21st-century sociology). Oxford: Blackwell.
Kivisto, P., & Faist, T. (2010). Beyond a border. The causes and consequences of contemporary immigration. Los Angeles: Pine Forge.
Kogan, I. (2011a). New immigrants—old disadvantage patterns? Labour market integration of recent immigrants into Germany. International Migration, 49(1), 91–117.
Kogan, I. (2011b). The price of being an outsider: Labour market flexibility and immigrantsʼ employment paths in Germany. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(4), 264–283.
Landolt, P. (2001). Salvadoran economic transnationalism: Embedded strategies for household maintenance, immigrant incorporation, and entrepreneurial expansion. Global Networks, 1(3), 217–241.
Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkely: University of California Press.
Massey, D. S. (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 56(1), 3–26.
Meier-Braun, K.-H. (2002). Deutschland, Einwanderungsland. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
OʼFlaherty, M., Skrbis, Z., & Tranter, B. (2007). Home visits: Transnationalism among Australian immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(5), 817–844.
OECD. (2008). International Migration Outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Portes, A. (2003). Conclusion: Theoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37(3), 874–892.
Schönwälder, K. (2003). Zukunftsblindheit oder Steuerungsversagen? Zur Ausländerpolitik der Bundesregierungen der 1960er und frühen 1970er Jahre. In J. Oltmer (Ed.), Migration steuern und verwalten. Deutschland vom späten 19. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart (Vol. 12, pp. 123–144). Osnabrück: IMIS-Schriften.
Seibert, H., & Solga, H. (2005). Gleiche Chancen dank einer abgeschlossenen Ausbildung? Zum Signalwert von Ausbildungsabschlüssen bei ausländischen und deutschen jungen Erwachsenen. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 34(5), 364–382.
Snel, E., Engbersen, G., & Leerkes, A. (2006). Transnational involvement and social integration. Global Networks, 6(3), 285–308.
Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Cambridge: B. Blackwell.
Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. American Economic Review, 75(2), 173–178.
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2006). Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund—Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2005—Fachserie 1 Reihe 2.2—2005. Wiesbaden.
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2007). Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund—Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2006—Fachserie 1 Reihe 2.2—2006. Wiesbaden.
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2008). Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund—Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2007—Fachserie 1 Reihe 2.2—2007. Wiesbaden.
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009). Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund—Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2008—Fachserie 1 Reihe 2.2—2008. Wiesbaden.
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2010). Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund—Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2009—Fachserie 1 Reihe 2.2—2009. Wiesbaden.
Tucci, I. (2008). Lebenssituation von Migranten und deren Nachkommen in Deutschland. In S. Bundesamt, GESIS, & WZB. (Eds.), Datenreport 2008 (pp. 200–207). Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.
Vanwey, L. K. (2004). Altruistic and contractual remittances between male and female migrants and households in rural Thailand. [Article]. Demography, 41(4), 739–756.
Waldinger, R. (2008). Between “Here” and “There”: Immigrant cross-border activities and loyalties. International Migration Review, 42(1), 3–29.
Wenning, N. (1996). Migration in Deutschland. Ein Überblick. Münster: Waxmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schunck, R. (2014). Transnational Activities and Immigrant Integration in Germany. In: Transnational Activities and Immigrant Integration in Germany. International Perspectives on Migration, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03928-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03928-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03927-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03928-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)