Skip to main content

Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation: StabilitiTâ„¢ A New Delivery System for Vertebral Fractures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 108))

Abstract

Percutaneous vertebral augmentation for compression fractures with bone cement has become an increasingly popular form of treatment. Various delivery techniques and bone cements have been developed. StabiliT Vertebral Augmentation System (DFINE Inc., San Jose, CA) is a unique radiofrequency (RF) based system which delivers an ultra-high viscosity bone cement. The patented StabiliT ER bone cement has an extended working time prior to RF warming. When delivered through this unique hydraulic system an on-demand ultra-high viscosity cement can be delivered into an osteotome created cavity resulting in a clinical procedure with the best qualities of both vertebroplasty and conventional balloon assisted kyphoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alvarez L, Alcaraz M, Perez-Higueras A, Granizo J, et al. (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 31(10); 1113–1118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. (1987) Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty [in French]. Neurochirurgie 33; 166–168.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrop J, Prpa B, Reinhardt M, Lieberman I (2004) Primary and secondary osteoporosis’ incidence of subsequent vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty. Spine 29(19); 2120–2125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hulme P, Krebs J, Ferguson S, Berlemann U (2006) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine 31(17); 1983–2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim D, Vaccaro A (2006) Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment. Spine J 6; 479–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiner D, Wybo C, Sterba W, et al. (2008) Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation. Spine 33(24); 2618–2622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Majd M, Farley S, Holt R (2005) Preliminary outcomes and efficacy of the first 360 consecutive kyphoplasties for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine J 5; 244–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miko L, Szikora I, Grohs J, Murphy K (2009) Initial experience with radio-frequency based vertebral augmentation in treatment of vertebral compression fractures. 34th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology. San Diego, California (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy K, Wong E, Poser R, Kohm A (2009) Comparison of intravertebral pressure and height restoration in three minimally invasive treatments of vertebral compression fractures. 34th Annual Scientific Meeting of Society of Interventional Radiology. San Diego, California (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raley T, Poser R, Kohm A (2008) Comparative height restoration – cadaveric analysis of innovative energy modulated vertebral augmentation system. Spine Technology Education Group Meeting. Los Cabos, Mexico. http://www.medostar.org/steg/index.php

  11. Raley T, Poser R, Kohm A (2009) Comparative height restoration of three vertebral augmentation systems for treatment of vertebral compression fractures. 55th Annual Meeting of the ORS, Las Vegas, Nevada (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wong E, Poser R, Kohm A (2009) Effect of viscosity on lifting force and extravasation in a defect model. 55th Annual Meeting of the ORS, Las Vegas, Nevada (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statementWe declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robertson, S.C. (2011). Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation: StabilitiTâ„¢ A New Delivery System for Vertebral Fractures. In: Alexandre, A., Masini, M., Menchetti, P. (eds) Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 108. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-99369-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-99370-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics