Skip to main content

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present an ontology for hospital scenarios (called OntHoS). It was developed by a couple of research projects dealing with the application of agent systems in hospital scenarios. The aim of OntHoS is to establish a basis for a description of these scenarios and to facilitate their inter-operability. Therefore, we classify types of ontologies and approaches to ontology design, we focus on constructing a domain ontology and discuss the proceeding as well as the encountered problems. Finally, an overview about the future work is given, focussing especially on opening the scope to task ontologies for special project-specific purposes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gruninger, M.; Lee, J.: Ontology - Applications and Design. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 2, February 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holsapple, C. W.; Joshi, K. D.: A Collaborative Approach to Ontology Design. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 2, February 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, H.W., Lammers, D., Lippe, W.: Predicting how Ontologies for the Seman-tic Web evolve. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 2, February 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Everett, J- O.; Bobrow, D. G.; Stolle, R.; Crouch, R.; de Paiva, V.; Condoravdi, C.; van den Berg, M.; Polanyi, L.: Making Ontologies work for resolving Redun-dancies across Documents. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 2, Febru-ary 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guarino, N.; Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Deciscions with Ontoclean. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 2, February 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Noy, N. F.; Fergerson, R. W.; Musen M. A.: The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: combining interoperability and flexibility. 2th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW’2000), Juan-les-Pins, France, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Noy, N. F.; Sintek, M.; Decker, S.; Crubezy, M.; Fergerson, R. W.; Musen. M. A.: Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intelligent Sys-tems 16(2): 60–71, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Musen, M. A.; Fergerson, R. W.; Grosso, W. E.; Noy, N. F.; Crubezy, M.; Gen-nari, J. H.: Component-Based Support for Building Knowledge-Acquisition Sys-tems. Conference on Intelligent Information Processing (TIP 2000) of the Interna-tional Federation for Information Processing World Computer Congress (WCC 2000), Beijing, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grosso, W. E.; Eriksson, H.; Fergerson, R. W.; Gennari, J. H.; Tu, S. W.; Musen, M. A.: Knowledge Modeling at the Millennium (The Design and Evolution of Protégé-2000). 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devedzic, V: Ontologies: Borrowing from Software Patterns. Communications of the ACM, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. AI Watch - The Newsletter of Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 4–6. AI Intelligence, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knuth, D. E.: The Art of Computer Programming; Volume 2: Semi numerical Algorithms. Addison Wesley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guarino, N.; Giaretta, P.: Ontologies and Knowledge Bases - Towards a Termi-nological Clarification. In: Mars, N.J.I. (ed.): Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing. Amsterdam 1995, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guarino, N.: The Ontological Level. In: Casati, R.; Smith, B.; White, G. (eds.): Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences. Wien, 1994 (revised version 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guarino, N.: Understanding, Building, And Using Ontologies. International Jour-nal of Human-Computer Studies 46 (1997), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Studer, R.; Fensel, D.; Decker, S.; Benjamins, V.R.: Knowledge Engineering: Survey and Future Directions. In: Puppe, F. (ed.): XPS-99: Knowledge-Based Systems - Survey and Future Directions. 5th Biannual German Conference on Knowl-edge-Based Systems, 03.05.09.1999 in Würzburg, Proceedings. Berlin et al. 1999, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5 (1993) 2, 199–220. See also: Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL 92–71, Computer Science Department, Stanford University. Stanford 1993 (revised version).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chimæra Home Page:http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/software/chimaera/

  19. OILEd Home Page:http://oiled.man.ac.uk/

  20. Fikes, R.; Farquhar, A.; Rice, J.:. Tools for Assembling Modular Ontologies in Ontolingua. Knowledge Systems Laboratory, April, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Protégé Home Page:http://www.protege.stanford.edu/software/chimaera/

  22. OntHoS Home Page:http://16-spike-dos.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/Ontologie/

  23. Dharma Guideline Model:http://smi-web.stanford.edu/projects/eon/DharmaUserGuide/

  24. Samuelson, P. A.; Nordhaus, W. D.: Economics, Boston et al. 1998, 80–101.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Russel, S. J.; Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence - A Modern Approach, London et al. 1995, 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Seidensticker, A.: Organisation des Operationsbereiches im Krankenhaus - Eine empirisch-explorative Studie zur Beurteilung zentralisierter versus dezentrali-sierter Operationsbereiche, Frankfurt a.M. et al 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Czap, H.: Policy-Agents as Personal Assistants: The Case of Hospital Schedul-ing. D-CSCW 2000 Deutsche Computer Supported Cooperative Work Fachtagung - Verteiltes Arbeiten - Arbeit der Zukunft, Workshop-Proceedings: Agents and CSCW: A Fruitful Marriage?, München 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. SeSAm Home Page:http://www.simsesam.de/

  29. Klügl, F.; Herrler, R.; Oechslein, C.: From Simulated to Real Environments: How to use SeSAm for software development accepted at: First German Conference on Multiagent System Technologies (MATES03), Erfurt, 2003

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker, M., Heine, C., Herrler, R., Krempels, KH. (2003). OntHoS — an Ontology for Hospital Scenarios. In: Moreno, A., Nealon, J.L. (eds) Applications of Software Agent Technology in the Health Care Domain. Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies and Autonomic Computing. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7976-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7976-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-2662-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7976-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics