Abstract
We live in an era when the future of human rights in increasingly contentious. The ever-evolving technology and its impact on the human environment shape the debates on being human. How should the basic elements that make people human be discussed in the posthuman and postdigital era? Will the discussion of the legal status of non-human entities (such as robots) within the framework of rights lead to a reshaping of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? These questions are important for discussing the future of human rights law in the posthuman and postdigital era. The expected change in human rights law may well be regarded as an extraordinary transformation. However, the realities of life changed by technology will also have some consequences in terms of international human rights law. The challenge created by Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the protection of human rights is one of these consequences. This chapter aims to reveal the conflict and tension that has arisen between human rights and AI. In this respect, human rights may be threatened and violated through AI tools, and so their application will be examined with sample cases. After defining the tension in question, the steps to be taken in the legal sense will be discussed. First, in order to discuss the possibility of assigning responsibility to AI tools, it will be examined whether an international legal personality can be attributed to AI tools. Subsequently, the importance of establishing and adopting legal regulations regarding AI tools will be emphasized. States play the main role in the formation of these legal regulations. So, in the formation of these legal regulations, both internal and external dimensions of State sovereignty will be analysed and the steps that States should take to prevent human rights violations in the posthuman and postdigital age will be explained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt. Accessed 1 March 2023.
- 2.
Article 19(3) reads: ‘The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary: (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.’
- 3.
‘No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.’
- 4.
‘Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.’
- 5.
- 6.
To figure out how Facial Recognition Technologies work, see Davide (2020).
- 7.
It must be noted that if international law does not contain provisions on these issues, states must respect the fundamental principles of international law, such as the principle of sovereign equality.
References
Adriano, E. A. Q. (2015). The Natural Person, Legal Entity or Juridical Person and Juridical Personality. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 4(1), 363–391.
AI HLEG. (2019). A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. Brussels: European Commission.
Bajema, N. (2022). AI’s 6 Worst-Case Scenarios. IEEE Spectrum, 3 January. https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-worst-case-scenarios. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Belenguer, L. (2022). AI bias: Exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI and Ethics, 2(4), 771–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8.
BrainyQuote.Com. (n.d.). Albert Einstein Quotes. https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/albert_einstein_385842. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Brkan, M. (2019). Freedom of expression and Artificial Intelligence: On personalisation, disinformation and (lack of) horizontal effect of the Charter. Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3354180.
Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., Anderson, H., Roff, H., Allen, G. C., Steinhardt, J., Flynn, C., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Beard, S., Belfield, H., Farquhar, S., Lyle, C., Crootof, R., Evans, O., Page, M., Bryson, J., Yampolskiy, R., & Amode, D. (2018). The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/275332/1802.07228.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 77–91.
Burri, T. (2017). International Law and Artificial Intelligence. German Yearbook of International Law, 60, 91–108. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3060191.
Calo, R. (2017). Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap. UC Davis Law Review, 51(2), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350.
Castel, J. G., & Castel, M. E. (2016). The Road to Artifificial Super-Intelligence: Has International Law a Role to Play? Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 14(1), 1–15.
Clarke, L. (2021). AI is mostly governed by ‘soft law’. But that is set to change. TechMonitor, 21 September. https://techmonitor.ai/policy/ai-mostly-governed-by-soft-law-but-set-to-change. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In Council of Europe Treaty Series 005. Council of Europe.
Crawford, J. (2013). Sovereignty as a Legal Value. In J. Crawford & M. Koskenniemi (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law. 3rd Ed. (pp. 117–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. 9th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davide, C. (2020). Is facial recognition too biased to be let loose? Nature, 587, 347–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03186-4.
Deb, S. (2016). Donald Trump: ‘Torture works’. CBS News, 17 February. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-torture-works/. Accessed 30 November 2022.
ECCHR. (n.d.). Hard law/soft law. https://www.ecchr.eu/en/glossary/hard-law-soft-law/. Accessed 30 November 2022.
ECNL. (2019). Counter-Terrorism & Human Rights: Soft Law, Hard Consequences. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Terrorism/SR/UNSRCTbrieferSoftLaw.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Eduardovich, R. O. (2017). Criminal Liability of the Artificial Intelligence. Problems of Legality, 138, 132–141.
Etzioni, O. (2017). How to Regulate Artificial Intelligence. The New York Times, 1 September. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/artificial-intelligence-regulations-rules.html. Accessed 30 November 2022.
European Parliament. (2017). Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.html. Accessed 30 November 2022.
European Parliament. (2021). Report on artificial intelligence: Questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice (2020/2013(INI)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0001_EN.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Ferrer, X., Nuenen, T. van, Such, J. M., Coté, M., & Criado, N. (2021). Bias and Discrimination in AI: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 40(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3056293.
Galeon, D. (2017). An Inside Look at the First Nation With a State Minister for Artificial Intelligence. Futurism, 12 November. https://futurism.com/uae-minister-artificial-intelligence. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Gibbs, S. (2014). Elon Musk: Artificial intelligence is our biggest existential threat. The Guardian, 27 October. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/27/elon-musk-artificial-intelligence-ai-biggest-existential-threat. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Hárs, A. (2021). AI and International Law – Legal Personality and Avenues for Regulation. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 62(4), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2022.00352.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (1944). Convention on Civil Aviation—Chicago Convention, 7 December 1944, 15 UNTS 295. https://www.icao.int/publications/documents/7300_orig.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2023.
Ismail, N. (2018). The Success of Artificial Intelligence Depends on Data. Information Age, 23 April. https://www.information-age.com/success-artificial-intelligence-data-10142/. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Jandrić, P. (2019a). The Postdigital Challenge of Critical Media Literacy. The International Journal of Critical Media Literacy, 1(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1163/25900110-00101002.
Jandrić, P. (2019b). We-Think, We-Learn, We-Act: the Trialectic of Postdigital Collective Intelligence. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00055-w.
Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital Science and Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000.
Kasap, A. (2022). Güncel Gelişmeler Işığında Türk Hukukunda Yapay Zekâ Varlıkları ve Hukuki Kişilik. Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 485–556.
Kaye, D. (2015). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression (A/HRC/29/32). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/798709. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Kaye, D. (2018). Promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/73/348). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1643488. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Lavanchy, M. (2018). Amazon’s sexist hiring algorithm could still be better than a human. The Conversation, 1 November. https://theconversation.com/amazons-sexist-hiring-algorithm-could-still-be-better-than-a-human-105270. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Leslie, D., Burr, C., Aitken, M., Cowls, J., Katell, M., & Briggs, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law: A primer. Brussels: The Council of Europe.
Manheim, K., & Kaplan, L. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Risks to Privacy and Democracy. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 21, 106–188.
McKendrick, J. (2021). The Data Paradox: Artificial Intelligence Needs Data; Data Needs AI. Forbes, 27 June. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joemckendrick/2021/06/27/the-data-paradox-artificial-intelligence-needs-data-data-needs-ai/?sh=1d0d7ff571a5. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Mijatović, D. (2018). In the era of artificial intelligence: Safeguarding human rights. Open Democracy Blog, 3 July. https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/view/-/asset_publisher/ugj3i6qSEkhZ/content/in-the-era-of-artificial-intelligence-safeguarding-human-rights/pop_up?inheritRedirect=true. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Mijatović, D. (2019). Unboxing artificial intelligence: 10 steps to protect human rights. Open Democracy Blog, 14 May. https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/unboxing-artificial-intelligence-10-steps-to-protect-human-rights. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Non-Discrimination Ombudsman. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence and equality. https://syrjinta.fi/en/artificial-intelligence-and-equality. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2019). AI, Human Evolution, and the Speed of Learning. In J. Knox; Y. Wang; & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive Education: speculative futures and emerging practices (pp. 195–206). Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4_12.
Prokhovnik, R. (1996). Internal/external: The state of sovereignty. Contemporary Politics, 2(3), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569779608454736.
Russom, P. (2018). Data Requirements for Machine Learning. TDWI, 14 September. https://tdwi.org/articles/2018/09/14/adv-all-data-requirements-for-machine-learning.aspx. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Schank, R. C. (1987). What Is AI, Anyway? AI Magazine, 8(4), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v8i4.623.
Shaffer, G. C., & Pollack, M. A. (2010). Hard Vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance. Minnesota Law Review, 94(3), 706–799.
Silva, D. F. (2011). From Human Rights to Person Rights: Legal Reflection on Posthumanism and Human Enhancement. In Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Department of Law (Ed.), 25th IVR World Congress: Law Science and Technology. Frankfurt am Main: Goethe University.
Strangio, S. (2017). Welcome to the Posthuman Rights World. Foreign Policy, 7 March. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/07/welcome-to-the-posthuman-rights-world/. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Talimonchik, V. P. (2021). The Prospects for the Recognition of the International Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence. Laws, 10(4), 85.
The Public Voice. (2018). Universal Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence. 23 October. Brussels: The Public Voice. https://thepublicvoice.org/ai-universal-guidelines/. Accessed 30 November 2022.
The UAE Government. (n.d.). Artificial Intelligence Office. https://ai.gov.ae/about_us/. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Timmers, P. (2022). AI Challenging Sovereignty and Democracy. Transatlantic Policy Quarterly, 20(4), 45–55.
Turner, J. (2019). Robot Rules: Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96235-1.
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2021). The right to privacy in the digital age (A/HRC/48/31). Paris: United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/ahrc4831-right-privacy-digital-age-report-united-nations-high. Accessed 30 November 2022.
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS XVI, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text. Accessed 8 March 2023.
United Nations. (1979). The Moon Treaty. Paris: United Nations. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/intromoon-agreement.html. Accessed 30 November 2022.
United Nations General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Treaty Series, 999, 171. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/ccpr.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2023.
United Nations General Assembly. (1982). Convention on the Law of the Sea, 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 397. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2023.
USTPC. (2020). Statement on Principles and Prerequisites for the Development, Evaluation and Use of Unbiased Facial Recognition Technologies. Washington, DC: ACM U.S. Technology Policy Committee. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/public-policy/ustpc-facial-recognition-tech-statement.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2022.
West, D. M., & Allen, J. R. (2018). How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the World. Brookings, 24 April. https://www.brookings.edu/research/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-world/. Accessed 30 November 2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Özdan, S. (2023). Don’t Leave Artificial Intelligence Alone: It Could Hurt Human Rights. In: Jandrić, P., MacKenzie, A., Knox, J. (eds) Constructing Postdigital Research . Postdigital Science and Education . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35410-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35411-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)