Skip to main content

Preliminary Construct of Sustainable Product Development with a Focus on the Brazilian Reality: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability in Practice

Abstract

The present study seeks to identify high impact articles and citations involving the Product Life Cycle and Triple Bottom Line areas: social, environmental and economic dimensions; in order to propose a product life cycle management construct capable of integrating social, environmental and economic dimensions. To achieve the objective, a systematic literature review (RSL) was first performed using the Biblioshiny and Bibliometrix tool. The sample consisted of 57 scientific articles. An analysis of descriptive statistics of the main bibliographic metrics was presented. A Sankey Diagram was generated relating different bibliographic factors (countries, journal and keywords). In addition, clustering methods were proposed, through analysis of bibliographic coupling, co-citation and scientific collaboration using Louvain's algorithm. Then, the factor analysis methods were used to propose a conceptual structure map. Finally, an analysis was carried out on the sample of 57 scientific articles to identify the relationship between the themes of the product life cycle, and the dimensions: social, environmental and economic. As a result, in addition to RSL, it was possible to propose a construct for product life cycle management capable of integrating the Triple Bottom Line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbagnano, N. (1970). Dicionário de filosofia. 2ª edição, Mestre Jou, São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abedini, A., Li, W., Badurdeen, F., & Jawahir, I. S. (2020). A metric-based framework for sustainable production scheduling. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 54, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. M., Karmaker, C. L., Doss, D. A., & Khan, A. H. (2020). Modeling the barriers in managing closed loop supply chains of automotive industries in Bangladesh. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 7(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSOM.2020.1.5

  • Alsaffar, A. J., Raoufi, K., Kim, K.-Y., Kremer, G. E. O., & Haapala, K. R. (2016). Simultaneous consideration of unit manufacturing processes and supply chain activities for reduction of product environmental and social impacts. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 138(10). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034481

  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959–975. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aires V., Nakamura F. (2017). Aplicação de Medidas de Centralidade ao Método Louvain para Detecção de Comunidades em Redes Sociais. XLIX Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa Operacional. Blumenau-SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bom, S., MRibeiro, H. M., & Marto, J. (2020). Sustainability calculator: A tool to assess sustainability in cosmetic products. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041437

  • Canciglieri Junior, O.; Noël; Frédéric; Rivest, Louis; Bouras, Abdelaziz(2021a). Product Lifecycle Management Green and Blue Technologies to Support Smart and Sustainable Organizations. 18th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2021 Curitiba, Brazil, July 11–14, 2021 Revised Selected Papers, Part I. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94335-6_1

  • Canciglieri Junior, O.; Noël; Frédéric; Rivest, Louis; Bouras, Abdelaziz (2021b). Product Lifecycle Management Green and Blue Technologies to Support Smart and Sustainable Organizations. 18th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2021b Curitiba, Brazil, July 11–14, 2021b Revised Selected Papers, Part II. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94399-8_31

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, R., & da Silva, A. R. (2021). Sustainability requirements of digital twin-based systems: A meta systematic literature review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125519

  • Chang, An-Yuan; Cheng, Yen-Tse. (2018). Analysis model of the sustainability development of manufacturing small and medium - sized enterprises in Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, Department of Industrial Management, nº 64, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.025

  • Chigada, P. I., Wale, O., Hancox, C., Vandaele, K., Breeze, B., Mottram, A., & Roberts, A. J. (2021). Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion capacitors production from primary ore and recycled minerals using lca to balance environmental, economic and social performance in early phase research and development. Johnson Matthey Technology Review, 65(3), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1595/205651321x16165776867357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter N, Monarch I, Konda S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(13):1206–1223. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:133.3.CO;2-6

  • Collier, Z. A., Connelly, E. B., Polmateer, T. L., & Lambert, J. H. (2017). Value chain for next-generation biofuels: Resilience and sustainability of the product life cycle. Environment Systems and Decisions, 37(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9618-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Carvalho, A. P., & Barbieri, J. C. (2012). Innovation and sustainability in the supply chain of a cosmetics company: A case study. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242012000200012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djatna, T., & Prasetyo, D. (2019). Integration of sustainable value stream mapping (Sus. VSM) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) to improve sustainability performance. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.4.9302

  • Djuric Ilic, D., Eriksson, O., Ödlund (former Trygg), L., & Åberg, M. (2018). No zero burden assumption in a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.031

  • Esmaeilian, B., Sarkis, J., Lewis, K., & Behdad, S. (2020). Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105064

  • Ferrero, V., Raman, A. S., Haapala, K. R., & DuPont, B. (2019). Validating the sustainability of eco-labeled products using a triple-bottom-line analysis. Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, 3(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1520/SSMS20190022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furxhi, I., Perucca, M., Blosi, M., de Ipiña, J., Oliveira, J., Murphy, F., & Costa, A. L. (2022). ASINA Project: Towards a Methodological Data-Driven Sustainable and Safe-by-Design Approach for the Development of Nanomaterials. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.805096

  • Gbededo, M. A., & Liyanage, K. (2020). Descriptive framework for simulation-aided sustainability decision-making: A Delphi study. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12

  • Grieves, M. (2006). Product Lifecycle Management: Driving the next generation of lean thinking (1st ed., p. 319). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankammer, S., Jiang, R., Kleer, R., & Schymanietz, M. (2018). Are modular and customizable smartphones the future, or doomed to fail? A case study on the introduction of sustainable consumer electronics. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 23, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi Sohi, F. S., Mansour, S., & Dehghanian, A. (2022). Multi-objective optimization for selecting sustainable materials with simultaneous consideration of several components in a product. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 15(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2022.2080888

  • Hapuwatte, B. M., & Jawahir, I. S. (2021). Closed-loop sustainable product design for circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(6), 1430–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hede, S., Nunes, M. J. L., Ferreira, P. F. V., & Rocha, L. A. (2013). Incorporating sustainability in decision-making for medical device development. Technology in Society, 35(4), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinijou, S. A., Mansour, S., & Shirazi, M. A. (2014). Social life cycle assessment for material selection: A case study of building materials. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(3), 620–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0658-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • How, B. S., Yeoh, T. T., Tan, T. K., Chong, K. H., Ganga, D., & Lam, H. L. (2018). Debottlenecking of sustainability performance for integrated biomass supply chain: P-graph approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 720–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M., Hossain, A. T., & Mia, L. (2018). Role of strategic alliance and innovation on organizational sustainability. Benchmarking, 25(5), 1581–1596. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2016-0188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakoyun, F., Kiritsis, D., & Martinsen, K. (2014). Holistic life cycle approach for lightweight automotive components. Metallurgical Research and Technology, 111(3), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2014034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. J., Kara, S., & Kayis, B. (2014). Analysis of the impact of technology changes on the economic and environmental influence of product life-cycle design. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 27(5), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2013.814161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysovatyy, A., Zvarych, R., Zvarych, I., Krysovatyy, I., & Krysovata, K. (2020). Methodological architectonics of inclusive circular economy for eco-security of society under pandemic. Economic Annals-XXI, 184(7–8), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.21003/EA.V184-01

  • Laso, J., Margallo, M., Celaya, J., Fullana, P., Bala, A., Gazulla, C., Irabien, A., & Aldaco, R. (2016). Waste management under a life cycle approach as a tool for a circular economy in the canned anchovy industry. Waste Management and Research, 34(8), 724–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16652957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzo, P., Traverso, M., Mondello, G., Salomone, R., & Ioppolo, G. (2018). Sustainability performance of an italian textile product. Economies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6010017

  • Li, X., Cao, J., Liu, Z., & Luo, X. (2020). Sustainable business model based on digital twin platform network: The inspiration from haier’s case study in China. Sustainability (switzerland), 12(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. J., Belis, T. T., & Kuo, T. C. (2019). Ergonomics-based factors or criteria for the evaluation of sustainable product manufacturing. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184955

  • Lukas, P., & Artelt, C. (2020). Sustainable product portfolio evaluation methodology for sustainability reporting in the cement and concrete industry. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n1p66

  • Lukman, R. K., Omahne, V., & Krajnc, D. (2021). Sustainability assessment with integrated circular economy principles: A toy case study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073856

  • Luthe, T., Kägi, T., & Reger, J. (2013). A systems approach to sustainable technical product design: Combining life cycle assessment and virtual development in the case of skis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(4), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., Harstvedt, J. D., Dunaway, D., Bian, L., & Jaradat, R. (2018). An exploratory investigation of Additively Manufactured Product life cycle sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., & Kremer, G. E. O. (2016). A sustainable modular product design approach with key components and uncertain end-of-life strategy consideration. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 85(1–4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7979-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S., Hemdi, A. R., Mat Saman, M. Z., & Mohd Yusof, N. (2015). Graphical user interface for assessing sustainability by using fuzzy logic: a case study on hollow fiber membrane module. Jurnal Teknologi, 76(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.3994.

  • Mahmood, S;Saman, M Z M;Hemdi, A R;Zakuan, N. (2017). Potential impacts for monitoring sustainability: Case study of hollow fiber membrane. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2017.2682.2686.

  • Marques, A. D., Marques, A., & Ferreira, F. (2020). Homo Sustentabilis: circular economy and new business models in fashion industry. SN Applied Sciences, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2094-8

  • Martín Gómez, A. M., Aguayo González, F., & Marcos Bárcena, M. (2018). Smart eco-industrial parks: A circular economy implementation based on industrial metabolism. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.007

  • Melo, A. C. S., Braga A.E., J., Leite, C. D. P., Bastos, L. S. L., & Nunes, D. R. L. (2021). Frameworks for reverse logistics and sustainable design integration under a sustainability perspective: a systematic literature review. Research in Engineering Design, 32(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-020-00351-8

  • Omidzadeh, D., Sajadi, S. M., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., & Movahedi Sobhani, F. (2022). A sustainability approach to vehicle modular platform design: A mathematical model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221092514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, J., Cucuzzella, C., & Revéret, J.-P. (2013). Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(9), 1642–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0485-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peralta, M. E., Alcalá, N., & Soltero, V. M. (2021). Weighting with life cycle assessment and cradle to cradle: A methodology for global sustainability design. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199042

  • Riehmann, P., Hanfler, M., & Froehlich, B. (2005). Interactive Sankey Diagrams. Conference Paper in IEEE Xplore, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, D., Serafini, M., & Rizzi, C. (2016). TRIZ based computer aided LCA for Ecodesign. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 13(6), 816–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2016.1168225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salari, M., & Bhuiyan, N. (2018). A new model of sustainable product development process for making trade-offs. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(1–4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9349-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangwan, K. S., Bhakar, V., & Digalwar, A. K. (2019). A sustainability assessment framework for cement industry – a case study. Benchmarking, 26(2), 470–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2018-0021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salwa ,M. Muhamad, Z. Mat, S. Abdul, R. H. (2017). Potential impacts for monitoring sustainability: Case study of hollow fiber membrane. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 12. https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2017.2682.2686

  • Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Kazeminia, A. (2015). Does implementing social supplier development practices pay off? Supply Chain Management, 20(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2014-0239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, E., Ozdemir, Z., & Satoglu, S. I. (2022). Sustainable Planning of Precious and Rare Elements’ Recycling from Waste Electronic Products: A Multi-objective Model and Application. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-022-00245-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solaimani, S., Parandian, A., & Nabiollahi, N. (2021). A holistic view on sustainability in additive and subtractive manufacturing: A comparative empirical study of eyewear production systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910775

  • Stark, J. (2006). Product Lifecycle Management: 21st century paradigm for product realization (p. 441). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, B., & Palander, S. (2016). A selection of safeguard subjects and state indicators for sustainability assessments. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(6), 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1052-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, K., & Yung, W. K. C. (2018). Modeling social life cycle assessment framework for an electronic screen product—A case study of an integrated desktop computer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomé, A., & Scavarda, A. (2015). A Systematic literature review of design-manufacturing integration for sustainable products. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 45, 691–696. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1545116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomé, A.M.T., Scavarda, A., Ceryno, P.S. et al. (2016). Sustainable new product development: a longitudinal review. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1166-3

  • Tomov, M., & Velkoska, C. (2022). Contribution of the quality costs to sustainable development. Production Engineering Archives, 28(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2022.28.19

  • Van Schoubroeck, S., Springael, J., Van Dael, M., Malina, R., & Van Passel, S. (2019). Sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals: A Delphi study using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Su, D., Ma, M., & Kuang, W. (2021). Sustainable product development and service approach for application in industrial lighting products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1808–1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokokawa, N., Masuda, Y., Amasawa, E., Sugiyama, H., & Hirao, M. (2020). Systematic packaging design tools integrating functional and environmental consequences on product life cycle: Case studies on laundry detergent and milk. Packaging Technology and Science, 33(11), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaabar, I., Arango-Miranda, R., Beauregard, Y., & Paquet, M. (2021). A sustainable multicriteria decision framework for obsolescence resolution strategy selection. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158601

  • Zhang, H., & Haapala, K. R. (2015). Integrating sustainable manufacturing assessment into decision making for a production work cell. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Carneiro Gonçalves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lourenço, F., Nara, E.O.B., Gonçalves, M.C., Canciglieri Junior, O. (2023). Preliminary Construct of Sustainable Product Development with a Focus on the Brazilian Reality: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. In: Leal Filho, W., Frankenberger, F., Tortato, U. (eds) Sustainability in Practice. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34436-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics