Abstract
A Cyber-Physical Production System (CPPS) is represented by the interconnection between two kinds of systems: the first is virtual, which has increased computational capacities, and the second is physical, represented by a production workshop. In particular, this interconnection is intended to guarantee real-time monitoring of the execution of production operations, providing coordinators with relevant information to enable them to control the system and achieve the planned performance. However, the distributed architecture of the system and the massive data from each physical entity create certain limitations for the coordinators. This is a limitation in terms of medium and long-term perspective, mainly linked to the local decision-making action taken by the coordinator, which affects the performance of the CPPS. To help the coordinator in his decisions, it is first necessary to understand his limitations and incapacities vis-à-vis the CPPS system. The objective of this paper is to classify the limitations in terms of understanding the situation and the behaviors needed by the coordinators to deal with a dysfunctional situation that requires intervention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antons, O., Arlinghaus, J.C.: Distributed control for Industry 4.0 - a comparative simulation study. IFAC-Paper, vol. 54, no 1, pp. 516–521 (2021)
Almada-Lobo, F.: The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES). J. Innov. Manag. 3(4), 16–21 (2016)
Cui, X.: Cyber-Physical System (CPS) architecture for real-time water sustainability management in manufacturing industry. Procedia CIRP 99, 543–548 (2021)
Ribeiro, L., Bjorkman, M.: Transitioning from standard automation solutions to cyber-physical production systems: an assessment of critical conceptual and technical challenges. IEEE Syst. J. 12(4), 3816–3827 (2018)
Trappey, A.J.C., Trappey, C.V., Govindarajan, U.H., Sun, J.J., Chuang, A.C.: A review of technology standards and patent portfolios for enabling cyber-physical systems in advanced manufacturing. IEEE Access 4, 7356–7382 (2016)
Dalenogare, L.S., Benitez, G.B., Ayala, N.F., Frank, A.G.: The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 204, 383–394 (2018)
Antons, O., Arlinghaus, J.C.: Adaptive self-learning distributed and centralized control approaches for smart factories. Procedia CIRP 104, 1577–1582 (2021)
Büchi, G., Cugno, M., Castagnoli, R.: Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 150, 119790 (2020)
Osterrieder, P., Budde, L., Friedli, T.: The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 221, 107476 (2020)
Elvis, H.: Smart factory for industry 4.0: a review. Int. J. Mod. Manuf. Technol. (2015)
Darwish, L.R., El-Wakad, M.T., Farag, M.M.: Towards sustainable industry 4.0: a green real-time IIoT multitask scheduling architecture for distributed 3D printing services. J. Manuf. Syst. 61, 196–209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.09.004
Yang, Y.: MES technology analysis and optimization for electronic manufacturing industry. In: présenté à International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System (ICRIS) (2017)
Kim, T.H., Jeong, J., Kim, Y.: A conceptual model of smart manufacturing execution system for rolling stock manufacturer. Procedia Comput. Sci. 151, 600–606 (2019)
Antons, O.: Data-driven and autonomous manufacturing control in cyber-physical production systems. Comput. Ind. 9 (2022)
Zimmermann, E.: Multicriteria decision-making method for scheduling problem based on smart batches and their quality prediction capability. Comput. Ind. 12 (2021)
Antons, O., Arlinghaus, J.C.: Designing decision-making authorities for smart factories. Procedia CIRP 93, 316–322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.047
Ante, G., Facchini, F., Mossa, G., Digiesi, S.: Developing a key performance indicators tree for lean and smart production systems. IFAC-Paper, vol. 51, no 11, pp. 13–18 (2018)
Murmura, F., Bravi, L., Santos, G.: Sustainable process and product innovation in the eyewear sector: the role of industry 4.0 enabling technologies. Sustainability 13(1), 365 (2021)
Neely, A., Adams, C., Crowe, P.: The performance prism in practice Meas. Bus. Excell. 5(2), 6–13 (2001)
João, M.R.: The Human in the loop in Cyber-Physical Systems: the case of Building Automation, p. 126 (2019)
Fuso Nerini, F., Keppo, I., Strachan, N.: Myopic decision making in energy system decarbonisation pathways. A UK case study. Energy Strategy Rev. 17, 19–26 (2017)
Mörth, O., Emmanouilidis, C., Hafner, N., Schadler, M.: Cyber-physical systems for performance monitoring in production intralogistics Comput. Ind. Eng. 142, 106333 (2020)
Ouazzani-Chahidi, A., Jimenez, J.-F., Berrah, L., Loukili, A.: Towards an inclusion of a PMS-based mechanism for Cyber-Physical Production Systems, p. 8
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.-A.: A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 3, 18–23 (2015)
Wassim, B., Sallez, Y., Nassima, A., Beldjilali, B.: A model for manufacturing scheduling optimization using learning intelligent products, p. 9 (2015)
Wagner, T., Hausner, Elger, J., Lowen, U., Luder, A.: Engineering Processes for Decentralized Factory Automation Systems. In Factory Automation. J. Silvestre-Blanes
Mezgebe, T.T., Bril El Haouzi, H., Demesure, G., Thomas, A.: A Negotiation-based control approach for disturbed industrial context. IFAC-Paper, vol. 51, no 11, pp. 1255–1260 (2018)
Zambrano, G., Pach, C., Adam, E., Berger, T., Trentesaux, D.: Myopic Behavior in Heterarchical Control of FMS, p. 11 (2012)
Souifi, A., Boulanger, Z.C., Zolghadri, M., Barkallah, M., Haddar, M.: Uncertainty of key performance indicators for Industry 4.0: A methodology based on the theory of belief functions. Comput. Ind. 140, 103666 (2022)
Rutkowska, M., Sulich, A.: Green Jobs on the background of Industry 4.0. Procedia Comput. Sci. 176, 1231–1240 (2020)
Janikova, D., Bezak, P.: Prediction of production line performance using neural networks. In: 2016 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition (AIPR) , p. 1–5. Lodz (2016)
Kang, N., Zhao, C., Li, J., Horst, J.A.: Analysis of key operation performance data in manufacturing systems. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 2767–2770. Santa Clara, CA, USA (2015)
Gawankar, S.A., Gunasekaran, A., Kamble, S.: A study on investments in the big data-driven supply chain, performance measures and organisational performance in Indian retail 4.0 context. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(5), 1574–1593 (2020)
Bouazza, W., Sallez, Y., Beldjilali, B.: A distributed approach solving partially flexible job-shop scheduling problem with a Q-learning effect. IFAC-Paper, vol. 50, no 1, pp. 15890–15895 (2017)
Mezgebe, T.T., Demesure, G., Bril El Haouzi, H., Pannequin, R., Thomas, A.: CoMM: a consensus algorithm for multi-agent-based manufacturing system to deal with perturbation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 105(9), 3911–3926 (2019)
Bhatia, M., Ahanger, T.A.: Intelligent decision-making in Smart Food Industry: Quality perspective. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 72, 101304 (2021)
Apiletti, D., et al.: iSTEP, an Integrated Self-Tuning Engine for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Ubiquitous Computing & Communications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Social Computing & Networking, Sustainable Computing & Communications (ISPA/IUCC/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom), Melbourne, Australia (2018)
Sardi, A., Sorano, E., Cantino, V, Garengo, P.: Big data and performance measurement research: trends, evolution and future opportunities. Meas. Bus. Excell. vol. ahead-of-print, no ahead-of-print (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2019-0053
Gallo, T., Santolamazza, A.: Industry 4.0 and human factor: How is technology changing the role of the maintenance operator?. Procedia Comput. Sci. 180, 388–393 (2021)
Osak-Sidoruk, M., Gola, A.: A method for modelling the flow of objects to be machined in FMS using enterprise dynamics, p. 11
Shah, L.A., Etienne, A., Siadat, A., Vernadat, F.B.: Performance visualization in industrial systems for informed decision making. IFAC-Paper, vol. 51, no 11, pp. 552–557 (2018)
Leitão, P., Alves, J., Pereira, A.I.: Solving myopia in real-time decision-making using petri nets models’ knowledge for service-oriented manufacturing systems. IFAC Proc. 43(4), 144–149 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ouazzani-Chahidi, A., Jimenez, JF., Berrah, L., Loukili, A. (2023). Classification of Coordinators’ Limitations in Cyber-Physical Production System Management. In: Motahhir, S., Bossoufi, B. (eds) Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 669. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29860-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29860-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29859-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29860-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)