Abstract
Predictive Process Monitoring (PPM) enables organizations to predict future states of ongoing process instances such as the remaining time, the outcome, or the next activity. A process in this context represents a coordinated set of activities that are enacted by a process engine in a specific order. The underlying source of data for PPM are event logs (ex post) or event streams (runtime) emitted for each activity. Although plenty of methods have been proposed to leverage event logs/streams to build prediction models, most works focus on stationary processes, i.e., the methods assume the range of data variability encountered in the event log/stream to remain the same over time. Unfortunately, this is not always the case as deviations from the expected process behaviour might occur quite frequently and updating prediction models becomes inevitable eventually. In this paper we investigate non-stationary processes, i.e., the impact of unseen data variability in event streams on prediction models from a structural and behavioural point of view. Strategies and methods are proposed to incorporate unknown data variability and to update recurrent neural network based models continuously in order to accommodate changing process behaviour. The approach is prototypically implemented and evaluated based on real-world data sets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Evermann, J., Rehse, J.-R., Fettke, P.: A deep learning approach for predicting process behaviour at runtime. In: Dumas, M., Fantinato, M. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 281, pp. 327–338. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_24
Hancock, J.T., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: Survey on categorical data for neural networks. J. Big Data 7(1), 1–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00305-w
Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)
Ly, L.T., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Rinderle-Ma, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Compliance monitoring in business processes: functionalities, application, and tool-support. Inf. Syst. 54, 209–234 (2015)
Maisenbacher, M., Weidlich, M.: Handling concept drift in predictive process monitoring. In: Services Computing, pp. 1–8 (2017)
Márquez-Chamorro, A.E., Nepomuceno-Chamorro, I.A., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Updating prediction models for predictive process monitoring. In: Franch, X., Poels, G., Gailly, F., Snoeck, M. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13295, pp. 304–318. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07472-1_18
Márquez-Chamorro, A.E., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Predictive monitoring of business processes: a survey. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 11(6), 962–977 (2018)
Pauwels, S., Calders, T.: Incremental predictive process monitoring: the next activity case. In: Polyvyanyy, A., Wynn, M.T., Van Looy, A., Reichert, M. (eds.) BPM 2021. LNCS, vol. 12875, pp. 123–140. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85469-0_10
Polato, M., Sperduti, A., Burattin, A., Leoni, M.D.: Time and activity sequence prediction of business process instances. Computing 100(9), 1005–1031 (2018)
Rinderle-Ma, S., Mangler, J.: Process automation and process mining in manufacturing. In: Polyvyanyy, A., Wynn, M.T., Van Looy, A., Reichert, M. (eds.) BPM 2021. LNCS, vol. 12875, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85469-0_1
Rinderle-Ma, S., Winter, K.: Predictive compliance monitoring in process-aware information systems: state of the art, functionalities, research directions. Technical report arXiv:2205.05446 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2205.05446
Rizzi, W., Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Maggi, F.M.: How do i update my model? on the resilience of predictive process monitoring models to change. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 64, 1385–1416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01666-9
Sak, H., Senior, A., Beaufays, F.: Long short-term memory based recurrent neural network architectures for large vocabulary speech recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.1128 (2014)
Tax, N., Verenich, I., La Rosa, M., Dumas, M.: Predictive business process monitoring with LSTM neural networks. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 477–492. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_30
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), GRK 2201 and by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) via the Austrian Competence Center for Digital Production (CDP) under the contract number 881843.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mangat, A.S., Rinderle-Ma, S. (2022). Next-Activity Prediction for Non-stationary Processes with Unseen Data Variability. In: Almeida, J.P.A., Karastoyanova, D., Guizzardi, G., Montali, M., Maggi, F.M., Fonseca, C.M. (eds) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13585. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17604-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17604-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17603-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17604-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)